Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Currys laptop 5 months old, broken.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Keep it short, i bought my wife a laptop late Nov 06 and on the 04/04/07 the screen dissapeared never to return again so i called the number on the leaflet that day and after checking out the laptop via the chap on the phone he arranged to get it picked up the next day saying 7 to 10 days to get it returned. Havent heard a dickie bird since so phoned today and was told they would call me back today at some point when they look into it, 4 o'clock came and i called back, eventually i was told they were waiting on a part coming from the manufacturers and couldnt give me an estimate of when it will be ready.

 

My wife is using our sons laptop for now as she is in the latter stages of her degree at uni but really needs her own one back, the whole situation in regards to no calls or letters to let us know the progress and the lack of a clear timescale it will now take has left me with a bad impression of their aftersales service and i will be taking my business elsewhere from now on.

 

They have now had this laptop for over a month now and it is only 5 months old, not impressed by their service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The seller has a duty to repair the laptop whilst limiting inconvenience to you as much as possible. I have no idea how long these things are supposed to take, but a month seems to be unreasonable to me.

 

I would write a letter to them asking for specific details. What is the part? Where is it sourced from? Is another part available that would do the same job? From this information, it may be worth a couple of phone calls to see if anyone else has the part, and you can then ask the shop to get the part there rather than waiting for their current supplier.

 

If it really is the case that there is no option but to wait for this part, and there are none in stock elsewhere, then there would be little point in going to another repairer, and all you can really do is claim damages for loss of convenience, or ask for a replacement laptop (I doubt you would get that and presume that you will want and need your own one back).

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx for the reply and yes she really wants the same one back due to programmes that have been put on it, i will just need to wait, the part is a motherboard and they are waiting on it from the manufacturer, dont suppose comntacting currys direct would help in the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly contact Curries and tell them to get the manufacturer to get a move on. You should be able to claim some money for inconvenience, but I suspect you would have a battle on your hands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you good lady has her data backed up??

'cause from my experience, few laptops come back with the data intact! Remember if they replace it, it will be as new in terms of software. So you will have to reinstall everything again.

 

And it's odd but most faults are alledgedly the motheboard, when sheds send laptops off to be repaired. In which case the HDD should not change, but they do!

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wont tell her that one for now lol, she has backed up all her data but she has a lot of things on the laptop she has downloaded and it was to save her from having to do all that again.

Thanks for the reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 28 days you are automatically entitled to a replacement to the same specification. Similar thing happened to me with a Dixons laptop. Third time it went in for repair it was in over a month. Called them up with the "28 days" weapon and was instantly given an "authorisation code" to go into Dixons and replace.

 

Just out of interest....wasnt a Fujitsu Siemens was it???

Jane

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eeek I replaced the awful Fujitsu with a Toshiba....:o

 

I was in a similar situation, all my coursework was on the laptop. Thankfully I had backed it up to another PC on our network so I didnt lose anything, but it played havok with my work for 6 weeks.

 

Tell the kids they dont need a laptop, its summer :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully yours will be ok, thats right she has backed it all up but as she says its all the programmes and sites she uses that she dosent want to have to set back up again and as you know the worst time of the year for it to break.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jane it was a Toshibquote]

My thoshiba laptop went last week its being collected tommrow i didnt phone up that number u phoned i phoned toshiba direct

 

Its going to go same repair center. Just do everything direct toshiba still open now if u need them call them i dont have the number sorry!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...