Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Removal of default notices on credit record?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2923 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sazwahhh,

 

You need to write to them that the entry on your credit file is in breach of the Principles of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The following draft letter may help:

 

 

"Account No: ??????????

 

Dear ?????

 

Thank you for the recent return of £?????? in cheque.

 

The entry you recorded on my credit file with the credit reference agencies is in breach of the Principles of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

In the circumstance of this case, the personal data recorded with the credit reference agencies in the form of defaults and default markers are irrelevant and inaccurate being the result of unlawful charges you applied to my account. I therefore request complete removal.

 

I request that the data is removed within 14 days and I reserve the right to take legal action when it becomes necessary.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

"

 

 

Good luck

 

 

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello everyone!

 

First post but signed up a month ago and with the moral support of this site, I'm going after £6431 naStYwest Bank has taken from me in the last 6 years (so thanks all - this really does make a positive difference).

 

I used to have a Natwest credit card too - charges totalling under £1000 (I think) - defaulted at £5700 in late 2004 and paid it off by end of 2005. I'm now told I have credit scoring issues because of a 'delinquency' and 'write off' by my lovely new bank manager at my lovely new bank (they offered to let me pay £5000 without explaining the impact of this and I stupidly thought they were being nice to me because I was making the effort!). I have two queries re the removal of the default - if anyone can give me a bit of help before I start on this action, I'd really appreciate it:

 

1. If I reclaim the charges using the template and they don't remove the default, can I then use the 'technical' route (no receipt of official default notice)? Or should I choose one option and stick to it?

 

2. Can I use the bank account charges as a reason why the credit card defaulted - i.e. merge the two together with reference to the credit card default to show that Natwest as an entity created the situation I found myself in?

 

Please help if you can - I've worked so hard to get back in the black and I'm on a mission re Natwest these days after some incredibly insulting comments from my bank manager - but that's another story!

 

Many thanks,

Holly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think option 2 is your best bet - you can link the two factors together, although your charges are quite low in relation to the amount you owed on your card. There are lots of posts around with people doing it this way - have a good read and try looking on capital one forum there are many on there. See what others think though who are more experienced than me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, this is my first post!

 

HSBC have started doing something that is quite new to me in my 9 years of banking with them. instead of paying or rejecting a payment, they put a 'late fee' notice on my credit report. i now have 3, and due to their delayed communication with experian, i may receive 2 more. i think 6/8 equals a default. can i get these removed? this is ruining my good credit!

Link to post
Share on other sites

naijagirl,

 

You have got a naijaboy here. Na wa oh!

 

Anyway, talking about HSBC and the default on your credit file, you can only remove it by making them aware that it is unlawful.

 

This process starts with a SAR (Subject Access Request) letter. The SAR letter will make them send you your statements dating back 6 years or more. You will then go through your statements and compile all the charges on the spreadsheet in the library. When the spreadsheet is complete, you will then send off your preliminary letter requesting refund and removal of all defaults.

 

Do not be afraid. It is not as difficult as it seem. You will need to read some information around to get more understanding. If you need help, simply ask here.

 

The following link will help you:

 

Letter Templates

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/

 

A-Z Guide to stuff

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/welcome-our-forum/53241-cant-find-what-youre.html

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, this is my first post!

 

HSBC have started doing something that is quite new to me in my 9 years of banking with them. instead of paying or rejecting a payment, they put a 'late fee' notice on my credit report. i now have 3, and due to their delayed communication with experian, i may receive 2 more. i think 6/8 equals a default. can i get these removed? this is ruining my good credit!

This happened to me as well. I wrote to them imediately pointing out that it is a breach of the data protection act. They wrote back saying that under the Ts & Cs they are entitled to record returned DDs etc on your credit file. This is true, except that the data protection has an absolute requirement that personal data be accurate. Therefore, if they want to record a returnd DD on your credit file it should be described as that, and not as 'a payment up to one month late', which is the format that credit reference agencies use. I wrote demanding that they remove the entry, and got no reply. So, off to court we go again...

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me as well. I wrote to them imediately pointing out that it is a breach of the data protection act. They wrote back saying that under the Ts & Cs they are entitled to record returned DDs etc on your credit file. This is true, except that the data protection has an absolute requirement that personal data be accurate. Therefore, if they want to record a returnd DD on your credit file it should be described as that, and not as 'a payment up to one month late', which is the format that credit reference agencies use. I wrote demanding that they remove the entry, and got no reply. So, off to court we go again...

 

Do you have a thread on this? I am in exactly the same situation....currently on number 3. Would like to follow your progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Linz, are you still trying to get default removed for next or have you given up, there are a few of us now trying so lets hope one of us will have a breakthrough. Not one person though seems to have received a copy of their CCA or default notice, just notice to say they will be defaulted and not that they have been. Would be really interested to see what stage you got to with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, don't give up linz, there are some good threads in legalities at the moment in the default bit regarding Next, I think we should all keep at it, I am going to definately send my first letter Tuesday, I know the response I will get, I also want to determine my old T&Cs in regard to processing old data. Mine has not been updated for a year, no record of my payment or anything - in which case if my T&Cs state that I have not given my consent for them to carry on processing data on my account (which to me must be the case as it has not been done) then maybe they have no legal right to hold default on historic account, so terms and conditions v.important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive sent this letter to MBNA and WESCOT and they are both just ignoring them.Ive reported both to ICO and the Banking ombudsman but still nothing happens,i just need a business account instead of using my personal account but i just get knocked back cos of this.Have now asked ICO If Defaults can be removed until these two come up with the requested data,meanwhile this has gone on since last year:-x

MBNA £250 bank charges refunded.:lol:

MBNA claimed £2700 in PPI:lol:

MBNA default removed.

WESCOT balance written off no cca.

WESCOT default removed.

TIME RETAIL.default removed.

LLOYDS TSB.£150 charges refunded

MINT £220 charges refunded.

currently 4 in dispute unenforcible agreements.

HFOS ordered to remove default

YORKSHIRE paid token £200 PPI going now for full £600

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a loan and credit card i presume wescot bought the debt but they have both defaulted me i really dont know as ive never received default notices thats why i sent them both standard letters saying provide the data or remove the defaults but i am no wiser as they havent replied

MBNA £250 bank charges refunded.:lol:

MBNA claimed £2700 in PPI:lol:

MBNA default removed.

WESCOT balance written off no cca.

WESCOT default removed.

TIME RETAIL.default removed.

LLOYDS TSB.£150 charges refunded

MINT £220 charges refunded.

currently 4 in dispute unenforcible agreements.

HFOS ordered to remove default

YORKSHIRE paid token £200 PPI going now for full £600

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really thought that reporting them to ICO would shake things up,i knew they couldnt provide default notices as i hadnt received them.But they seem to get away with ignoring everything thats the frustrating part you cant argue with someone who keeps quiet

MBNA £250 bank charges refunded.:lol:

MBNA claimed £2700 in PPI:lol:

MBNA default removed.

WESCOT balance written off no cca.

WESCOT default removed.

TIME RETAIL.default removed.

LLOYDS TSB.£150 charges refunded

MINT £220 charges refunded.

currently 4 in dispute unenforcible agreements.

HFOS ordered to remove default

YORKSHIRE paid token £200 PPI going now for full £600

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys,This is my first time posting and i saw this post and i need your guys help!!! I tryed your first letter and todayi got this response;

 

I regret that i am unable to provide you with a copy of thre original application in respect of the account

 

However, we are not legally obligated to do so. We are only required to provide a copy of the terms which were in effec t of the account being opened and the current terms. Copies of both these documents are enclosed.

 

Copies of your statements at the time of default are being sent to you under seperate cover and you should recieve these shoretly.

 

The £1 fee with your letter has been returned to your account.

 

A default notice was issued to you on 13 april 2004. default notices are produced by our computer system and we do not retain copies of them.

 

We are not legally obligated to retain a copy of the default notice and are only required to retain a record of it in our files.

 

It is a legal presumption that a letter properly addressed to the last know address on file is recieved in due course and this will apply to your default notice.

 

the debt was not sold on and no deed of assignment was issued.

 

 

 

What am i ment to do now? Help please!!

 

Oh and good luck everyone with all your claiming back!

Link to post
Share on other sites

voo51

 

Did the bank apply any charge to your account since you opened it? If yes, then your best way of getting the default removed is to begin claiming back of all charges. As part of your request for refund, you can then request the default to be removed being the result of unlawful charges.

 

Read around the site for information on how to claim back your money. The following link will help:

 

Step-by-step instructions for claiming back your money

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-step-step-instructions.html?highlight=library

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks guys, its really strange as the bank has now sent me a letter saying thankyou for your enquiry please fill in the form... and its a form for direct debits for the same card account that was closed 3 years back!

 

Very confusing, i am waiting for them to send me the statements for the card account to see about the charges.

 

Thankyou again:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi there, I've just registered and feel quite enlightened about the info by you members, thank you. My question is this, i recieved a letter from CBS transcom, saying they were acting on behalf of Arrow Global, who had purchased the debt from paragon.The debt is from 1994!!!

They have threatened me with court action and a charge on my house etc.. etc if I didnt up my payment agreement up from £30 month with paragon to £89.11 with them.

I agreed to do this as I am getting on top of my finances anf then when I checked my experian file they had defaulted me!!

I rang them and said why had they defaulted me and there reply was you defaulted in 2004/2005 (i think), i know i missed a few payments but the debt wasnt with Arrow/CBS then and the default date is 28/02/2007!!

I am now in a position to offer them a full and final settlement and when I rang them to remove this default when I paid it all I got was "it will show as satisfied, not removed"

I asked when I recieved the default notice from them (I havent recieved one from CBS/Arrow) and there reply was you will have recieved it from Paragon, or as was universal credit.

Where do I go from here, I am willing to pay what I owe, but surely the default can be removed, at the moment I have been defaulted twice, but how can I sort this out.

regards,

patch................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2923 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...