Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1970 vc Cabot YES, THEY ARE TAKING ME TO COURT


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having sent off my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to XXXXYZ CREDITXXX and XXXXYZ CREDITXXX and copied it to Cabot, within 3 days of sending it off I have a claim form through the letter box from Cabot from Northampton claiming the total of the two accounts.

 

This could be interesting.

 

Firstly I have not admitted either debts but have simply requested the usual SAR info with the view of bringing my own claim against them.

 

I am also intending to send a CCA request for both accounts as I suspect this will not produce an executed credit agreement.

 

I have not been home yet to read the particulars of claim but will update you in due course.

 

I will be needing your help.

 

Some questions to start with:

 

1. Do I send the CCA to Barclaycard and Providian or Cabot or all 3?

 

2. If the debt was sold but no credit agreement exists can Cabot still make a claim against me?

 

3. If there is a credit agreement and the SAR produces a load of charges (it will im sure) resulting in me having a counterclaim, who would I sue if the charges were applied by the credit card companies but it's the DCA that's suing me?

 

 

Cheers,

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Some questions to start with:

 

1. Do I send the CCA to Barclaycard and Providian or Cabot or all 3?

 

2. If the debt was sold but no credit agreement exists can Cabot still make a claim against me?

 

3. If there is a credit agreement and the SAR produces a load of charges (it will im sure) resulting in me having a counterclaim, who would I sue if the charges were applied by the credit card companies but it's the DCA that's suing me?

 

 

Cheers,

1970.

 

1 - this is still open to debate, but I would send the CCA request to Cabot.

2 - No no no no no

3- You would sue the original creditor as the applied the charges. I would also make it a request of any settlement, that they send your refund by cheque to you. This will stop them from simply reducing the debt with Cabot

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tbern123, thanks for your support.

 

I'm going to send a cca to the credit card companies, cabots and hodsons just to be safe.

 

Having now read the claim, there are two credit card debts which they have put together as one debt on the claim form with a total amount of £3000.

 

The claim form says that the debts were purchased by cabot and the defendant has failed to pay them.

 

A week ago I sent a SAR to the creditors, cabots and hodsons, so I'll wait and see what that produces.

 

Interestingly, on the claim form where the claimant declares "the facts in this claim for are true..." it is signed Kings Hill No1 Limited?? I thought this was a previous Cabot company but no longer operating.

 

I will acknowledge the claim on the last day as by then the 12 days will have passed in regard to the CCA.

 

Here are my thoughts (correct me if I'm wrong here)

 

Option 1: If there is an agreement then I will go down the unlawful charges route. I'll make a separate claim to the credit card company. If so, what happens to the debt on Cabots books?

 

Option 2: No agreement - unenforceable. End of story.

 

Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot UK PO Box 250 are making the claim.

Cabot Europe PO Box 241 is the address for documents and payments.

Kings Hill is authorised by the claimant to sign the statement of truth.

 

What a mess.

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot UK PO Box 250 are making the claim.

Cabot Europe PO Box 241 is the address for documents and payments.

Kings Hill is authorised by the claimant to sign the statement of truth.

 

What a mess.

 

1970.

 

Kingshill No1 Ltd is now a dormant company and this should be brought to the attention of the court. It didn't used to be until Jan 15th 2007 when the original Kingshill No1 Ltd changed its name to Cabot Financial (UK)Ltd. If Kingshill have now 'signed' a statement of truth, I'd be very interested to see a copy of it and so would a few others on here like tbern and Debt Mountain to see who has actually signed it and when. This could be a serious mistake of theirs.

 

Can you post the ACTUAL company names listed on the claim, putting their names in full - not just 'Cabot UK ' PM one of us if you prefer.

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be very interested, as my statement of truth was signed by WW Cabot Financial (Europe) who are not actually involved in my case.

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

It's a MCOL document issued by Northampton CC.

 

The exact wording as follows:

 

Claimant:

Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd

PO BOX 250, WEST MALLING, KENT ME19 4NA.

 

Address for sending documents and payments:

Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd

PO BOX 241, WEST MALLING, KENT, ME19 4NA

 

In the final section where is says "The claimant believes that the facts stated in this claim form are true and Iam duly authorised by the claimant to sign this statement"

 

Signed: KINGS HILL (NO1) LIMITED

 

(CLAIMANT) (CLAIMANT'S SOLICITOR)

 

"Claimant's solicitor" is xxxx'd out so it seems to me that there is an error that Kings Hill have signed as the claimant.

 

 

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's something strange about the name changing business. It seems Kings Hill is a trading company. Here's what I found at companies house:

 

Company No 03757424

Cloudhaven Ltd was formed 21/04/99

Changed its name to Kings Hill No1 Ltd 09/06/99

Changed its name again to Cabot Financial UK Ltd 15/01/07

 

Also...

 

Company No 03514391

Commercial Financial Services UK Ltd formed 20/02/98

Changed its name to Cabot Financial UK Ltd 12/03/99

Changed its name again to Kings Hill No1 Ltd 15/01/07

 

So...

 

Cabot UK became Kings Hill and Kings Hill became Cabot on the 15th Jan this year.

 

This means that Kings Hill is a trading company but it's Cabot UK in disguise.

 

Why would they do that? There must be a very dodge reason for it.

 

Question is, who holds my information? Who is the debt owed to?

 

If Cabot UK formally Kings Hill are making the claim then it's invalid. Any deed of assignment that may exist would be in the name of Cabot UK dated prior to 15/01/07 which means I should be sued by Kings Hill formerly known as Cabot UK.

 

That took me ages to write - but it makes sense. Perhaps this is why the claim is signed by Kings Hill

 

1970

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

A further thought...

 

Perhaps this name switching is to avoid litigation.

 

If you are suing "Cabot Financial UK Limited formerly known as Kings Hill No1 Limited" for unlawful charges, then on a technicality you should really be suing "Kings Hill No1 Limited formerly known as Cabot Financial UK Limited"

 

Man this is hard!

 

But having said that, mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself but talent instantly recognises genius.

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just downloaded my credit file from experian.

 

Cabot Financial UK Limited has registered 2 defaults for the two credit card debts dated 2003 and 2001.

 

Surely, Kings Hill No1 Limited should have registered the defaults (that's if they should have been registered in the first place) as Kings Hill No1 were the alleged owners of the debt in 2003 and 2001?

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as I posted on my thread... 2 defaults that were on my Experian report under Kings Hill (No.1) Ltd, have suddenly changed name in the last month to Cabot (UK) Ltd.

 

Funnily enough, they (Kings Hill) had a linked address on my report which I disputed with Experian about 10 days ago or so. Experian replied to me saying they had written to Kings Hill (No.1) Ltd, and they had replied back to say remove it. This letter was dated last week, so someone somewhere is replying to Kings Hill mail!

 

I have my N244 all lined up and ready to go, cos Cabot are trying to get heavy now... In for a penny, in for a couple of grand :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding name changes, the company number is the important thing.

 

It IS Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, formerly known as Kings Hill (no 1) Limited who now own your account.

 

15/1/07 is a significant date for another reason. See if you can work it out. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really shouldn't be using the Data Protection Act to get your data - 40 days is too long to get the required information.

 

Send a similarly worded request under the practice direction protocols:

 

PRACTICE DIRECTION – FURTHER INFORMATION - This Practice Direction supplements CPR Part 18

 

Remember, SPECIAL DELIVERY not RECORDED.

 

 

They are under no obligation to supply unless court proceedings are imminent, IMHO. They ARE obliged to supply your information under a SAR no matter what the reason.

 

But I stand to be corrected on the first point. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding name changes, the company number is the important thing.

 

It IS Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, formerly known as Kings Hill (no 1) Limited who now own your account.

 

15/1/07 is a significant date for another reason. See if you can work it out. ;)

 

 

Hi,

 

Wouldn't have anything to do with the FRAUD ACT, or whatever it's called, would it???:)

 

 

Regards, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, not sure how to play this one.

 

The claimant is Cabot Financial UK Limited (03757424) known as kings hill prior to Jan 07.

 

The defaults regsitered in my credit file are Cabot Financial UK Limited which is now known as Kings Hill No1 Limited.

 

All of the chasing letters I have are from Cabot Financial Europe Limited.

 

I also have letters from Hodson acting on behalf of their client Cabot Financial Europe Limited who administer the accounts on behalf of Cabot Financial UK Ltd.

 

A. So who owns the debt?

 

B. Who has the right to my information?

 

C. What should my line of defence or counterclaim be?

 

D. If Cabot Financial UK Limited now known as Kings Hill registered the defaults, does this mean they own the debts and if so should't I be sued by Kings Hill No1 Ltd as this was the campany called Cabot UK in 2001 and 2003?

 

E. Should I CCA them all?

 

Cheers...

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, not sure how to play this one.

 

The claimant is Cabot Financial UK Limited (03757424) known as kings hill prior to Jan 07.

 

The defaults regsitered in my credit file are Cabot Financial UK Limited which is now known as Kings Hill No1 Limited.

 

Don't worry about this. Effectively, Kings Hill are out of the picture.

 

All of the chasing letters I have are from Cabot Financial Europe Limited.

 

Europe are supposedly the company administering on behalf of UK.

 

I also have letters from Hodson acting on behalf of their client Cabot Financial Europe Limited who administer the accounts on behalf of Cabot Financial UK Ltd.

 

A. So who owns the debt?

 

Cabot Financial (UK) Limited

 

B. Who has the right to my information?

 

Depends. You really need to CCA them, and get this into dispute RIGHT NOW. If no agreement, or any other way of showing you consented to sharing of your data, NOBODY has the right.

 

C. What should my line of defence or counterclaim be?

 

See above. You need to get your dispute registered. If you DO end up in court before any of this is sorted out, it is VERY unlikely that Cabot will have a properly executed agreement to hand, and neither will they be able to prove that you were sent a correct notice of assignment. Any "Goodbye" or "Hello" letters that might turn up just don't fit the bill.

 

Both the above will get them struck out.

 

D. If Cabot Financial UK Limited now known as Kings Hill registered the defaults, does this mean they own the debts and if so should't I be sued by Kings Hill No1 Ltd as this was the campany called Cabot UK in 2001 and 2003?

 

Depends when the defaults were registered. If after 15/2/07, then Cabot UK is correct. It IS Cabot UK who will have the right to sue you, as they are the legal owners of your account. Don't get caught up in the Kings Hill scenario. Cabot keep spare names handy for reuse like everybody else has spare underpants.

 

E. Should I CCA them all?

 

CCA Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited. You'll get no answers from UK They have no employees. ( I know, feckin unbelievable innit?)

 

Cheers...

 

1970.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...