Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Incorrect charge amount on claim - help! *WON*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Upon checking back on my statements, i found that Natwest had duplicated some months in the statements they sent through, to which i included in my claim amount. My claim went through, Natwest have entered a defence and i have received the paperwork form cobbetts. I thought i would send thorugh my schedule as per their request, but wanted to double check - and have subsequently realised my mistake. What can i now do? can i write to the courts and amend my claim - or will this now be thrown out? the money i originally claimed for didnt include interest, but since i recalculated, the actual charges equate to around £200 less than what i have claimed, interest would be more than this - so could i get away with it??

 

If there is anyone that could help me or point me in the right direction, it would be much appreciated.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have NatWest raised the issue yet?

Did you include S.69 County Courts Interest at 8%?

 

Personally, I would leave it till they raise it, bear in mind it wont be going to court and therefore they will at some point offer settlement, no doubt with these charges removed. (which you should accept!)

 

If you are talking about Overdraft interest, then you should have claimed it from the outset, it is no argument for altering the claim.

 

You can alter the claim by filling in an N244 form and paying a fee of £35....but personally I'd leave it. I made the same error on my business claim, when they settled they merely deducted the charge I had included in error. Its your call:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kate,

 

Thanks for your quick reply!

 

I didnt calculate any interest that my charges accumalated, and therefore only claimed for the exact amount that they charged me for (well at least i originally thought!).

 

Natwest havent acknowledged any mistake, all i received was the standard papers form cobbetts requesting further info and stating their defence.

 

Maybe i should just leave it and if the bank realises they can deduct it from my claim?

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FM

 

I saw you just pop into chat then leave, if you want to come back you'll get loads of help.

I'm wondering how come you are at this late stage without claiming County Courts Interest at 8%. Depending on the size of your claim this could be alot of money. Remember this is the interest that the court allows you to add to your claim.

In fact i'm wondering a few things now........did you do spreadsheets/schedule of charges? What did your N1 form Particulars Of Claim say?

If you have left this interest off, it may well be worth amending your claim amount to include interest.

 

Tell me more.........:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kate,

 

Looking back now, i didnt do enough research. I only discovered this website yesterday and there is a wealth of information i didnt know!

 

Basically, i followed the steps form the bbc website, just sent one letter to natwest, received a negative response and within a few days, issued a court claim.

 

I only sent natwest a copy of my statements, highlighting the charges - as i didnt know about creating a spreadsheet. I havent sent anything to the court or to cobbetts.

 

I also didnt know about the interest and subsequently just claimed for my charges.

 

on the particulars i put:

 

1. Between 04/04/03 and 02/06/06 the

Defendant debited numerous charges from the

Claimant?s bank account.

2. The charges are an unfair penalty under

the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts

Regulations 1999, because they are a

disproportionately high sum in compensation

compared to the cost of the purported

breach.

3. Under the law of penalties, the charges

are an unlawful ?extravagant? penalty.

4. The Claimant asks the court to enter

judgment in their favour for £1117.11.

 

as per what i got from another website.

 

im all confused now, and not sure what to do - so any advice would be very much appreciated!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Just an update to anyone who read this or are going through their reclaim; I received a goodwill offer on the 30/01/08 for the full amount that I claimed of £1117.11. As previously mentioned, I calculated this amount incorrectly and the bank didn't check this - not that I am complaining!

 

Even though my claim is stayed in the courts pending the test case, I received the goodwill offer through the post which I duly accpeted by Recorded Delivery :-)

 

I must say, I am completely suprised but of course over the moon with this result.

 

Just thought I would add this to my thread in conclusion of my claim.

 

Goodluck to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations.

 

I've changed the thread title to add Won

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the congrats!

 

AKI: I couldn't personally comment on proceeding during the test case; however I do believe that payouts from the banks are inevitable, but we shall see...good luck with your claim.

 

I would also like to say thanks to all at CAG as if it weren't for all the other posts, success stories and help (Kate!), I would never have started my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...