Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fred Bassett v MBNA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am going to send off a CCA request to MBNA tomorrow and have read some of the threads on here with a lot of interest.

 

Everything seems to point to MBNA having something to hide. A couple of years ago, when my financial situation finally exploded in my face, my dealings with MBNA were strange to say the least. They were the most aggressive of all my creditors by far (of those that didn't use a DCA) and they were absolutely DESPERATE to stop me dealing with the matter through the CCCS.

 

I remember one particular series of calls:

 

A very aggressive bloke (Irish) rang me very late in the evening - gone 9pm. I was doing all I could by sorting out everything through the CCCS and I was annoyed, so I told him to **** off. The following day a woman rang me (also Irish) and she was much more conciliatory, but I still wouldn't budge. It turned out that this conversation was being listened in to by another man (Irish too) who did his absolute best to persuade me not to go the CCCS, claiming such things as 'You're a very proud man Mr Bassett, we can sort something out here, they're not acting in your interest' etc. What's the Irish connection here?

 

I felt then that they had something to hide and now I'm certain of it.

 

So tomorrow I'm going to kick off proceedings against MBNA and I'll keep you posted.

 

One question please - Does the non-production of the original credit agreement mean that they can't enforce the entire debt, or does it just apply to the interest and charges?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 380
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My understanding from other threads is the entire debt. It doesn't wipe out the debt, just means it can't be enforced I think. Not too sure as haven't had to look into this too deeply, but there are some mammoth threads on CCA that might be worth a look.

  • Haha 1

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks hal fax i,

 

I've been reading through some of the other threads but it's all a bit mind blowing, there's so much on there. I'll keep on though. I just wonder if, ultimately, they will simply be unable to enforce the debt and therefore have to pay people back. Sooner or later somebody will get to the bottom of it, but it's beginning to look like they've messed up in a big way.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred

 

I think you'll find that they can't enforce the debt without taking you to court and getting a ruling from a Judge.

 

As Half Ax I says there a some epic threads on this subject.

 

Good Luck Fred, it seems You and I have been victimised by two of the nastier financial institutions out there.

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks lazybones. This could all get very stressful so it's nice to know that I can come here for some moral support. It's much more than that too, knowing that other people have gone through exactly the same thing as me and have won through is all the encouragement I need.

 

I'm still encouraged by this CCA business, I think it's well worth a £1 postal order just in case the creditor can't produce the proper agreement, so I'll be starting a few more threads along these lines.

 

Have a nice day - don't know where you are in the world but down here in sunny Dorset it's just fabulous (as ever).

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the Irish connection here?

 

 

 

Perhaps MBNA are learning from Gerry Adams et al, and think that it doesn't matter if they break the law - Tony Bliar will let them get away with it anyway... :mad:

 

 

 

Realistically, call centres are big business here in NI and in the Republic, so MBNA may have spread its tentacles over the water.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite. Let's face it, Blair seems quite adept at breaking the law himself, witness that illegal little war in Iraq. He'll be gone soon. Hurrah!

 

Anyway, I did the deed and posted off the CCA request. I await their reply with considerable interest. Unlike some, my agreement has always been with MBNA themselves, not with another bank that was then taken over or with some kind of store card, so I don't know if maybe their record keeping is better in this instance. However, if they were simply doing it wrong it won't make any difference anyway.

 

Ah, how I would love to get one over on them. I'm looking forward to this.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to send my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to MBNA. Having read quite a few of the posts on here, I want to try and pre-empt their more like delaying tactics, so I have modified the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) slightly.

 

Before I send it off, I wonder if somebody could cast a critical eye over it as I don't want to find that I've altered the gist of it. I don't think I have, but it's good to be cautious.

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

MBNA Europe Bank Ltd

PO Box 1004

Chester Business Park

Chester

CH4 9WW

 

2nd May 2007

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxx

 

Standard template letter

 

In order for you to satisfy yourself as to my identity, I enclose a copy of my driving licence., however, Standard template letter.

 

Please also note that whereas you may not wish to treat this letter as a Subject Access Request, I DO. Feel free however, to return my cheque if that is your wish.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

Fred Bassett

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fred

 

Looks OK to me. A slight variation on the statndard. Also looks pretty much the same as the template letter here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

 

Did you notice the text in Red at the top of the template letter?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Half ax,

 

No I didn't - the trouble is, I copied onto a blank word document and saved it as my own template.

 

I've edited this out now - thanks for pointing this out.

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well today I received a letter from MBNA in response to my CCA request - quite prompt really, 7 days within the deadline.

 

I don't know whether or not what they've sent me is correct. It appears to be an acceptance form. My details on there are correct at the time I applied for the card which was over 10 years ago. Somebody else appears to have signed across my signature.

 

However, it is almost impossible to read. Could some of you experienced folks cast an eye over it and advise me what I should do next. Here's the link. The blue boxes have been put there by me to protect my identity and personal details.

 

Box.net - Free Online File Storage, Internet File Sharing, RSS Sharing, Access Documents & Files Anywhere, Backup Data, Share Files

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been through this document very carefully.

 

The most obvious things about it are:

  • The heading which states "Acceptance Form"
  • Section under the heading which states "Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1984"
  • The fact the most of the document is almost completely illegible.

However, it is possible, just, to make out what the individual boxes are, so here they are:

  1. Name and Address
  2. MBNA Card "I would like the following MBNA Car - Please tick 1 only"
  3. Personal Details
  4. Employment Details
  5. Your Income
  6. Other (?) - details of other credit agreements
  7. Security Question
  8. Additional Cardholder details
  9. Your Bank details
  10. Payment Protection Insurance (has Yes or No boxes but neither of them appear to be ticked).
  11. Principal Carholders Application and Declaration (I think this is what is says). This box was signed by me and it looks like another signature has also been made through it.

  • Underneath that is a box entitled "Your right to cancel"
  • Beneath that is the signature box - within this I can make out the words "This is a credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act ......."
  • Finally there is a heading "Data Prorection Act 1984" and some other words that start with "Any information provided by you ...."

Now, I've been trawling through a lot of threads regarding this subject and my understanding is that they should have provided details of:

I don't believe that any of these are on here.

 

Everything about this tells me that what they have sent is not a properly executed agreement, but without knowing what one of these looks like I can't tell!

 

HELP!

 

Thanks.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred

 

I an no expert but tihs looks like an application form to me.

 

your best bet is to get "Cornucopia" , "BattleAxe" or "bong" to have a look, they seem to have a lot of experiance in this field

 

As always Good Luck in the fight

  • Haha 1

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks lazybones. What's the best way of drawing it to their attention? Or should I just wait until one of them happens along?

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could post on one of their threads asking them to have a look at what you got and include the link to the document

 

MBNA Properly Executed Agreements

 

This is Cornucopia's thread

 

Tried the link thing but didn't work

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again - I'm actually reading through that one at the moment! it was from this thread that I got the idea to CCA MBNA - they're dodgy sods they really are.

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your welcome

 

Again Good Luck in the Fight

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW Lazybones, if you use the 'post reply' button instead of the quick reply, there is a hyperlink icon, so you can copy the address from the email, select the text you want to use as the link, click this button and paste the address in. Hope this helps.

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fred

 

they have cocked it up!!

 

EVEN if everything else was ok they have signed accross your sig box. This is forbidden. this alone will make the "agreement improperly executed, and maybe unenforceable,

 

1983 agreements regs s)6 (3)b

 

 

Signing of agreement

6.—(l) The terms specified in Column 2 of Schedule 6 to these Regulations in relation to the type of regulated agreement referred to in Column I (and no other terms) are hereby prescribed for the purposes of section 61(l)(a) of the Act (the terms which must be contained in a document if a regulated agreement is not to be improperly executed) and of section 127(3) (the terms which must be contained in a document before any enforcement order can be made under section 65(1), if section 61(l)(a) was not complied with).

 

(2) The lettering of the terms of the agreement included in the document referred to in section 6l(l)(a) of the Act, containing all the prescribed terms of the regulated agreement, and of the information contained in that document for the purpose of conforming to these Regulations shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible and of a colour which is readily distinguishable from the colour of the paper.

 

(3) The signature of the said document shall be made in the following manner—

 

(a) by the debtor or hirer, or by or on behalf of the debtor or hirer in the case of a partnership or an unincorporated body of persons, in the space in the document indicated for the purpose, and, subject to sub¬paragraph © below, the date of the signature shall be inserted in the space in the document indicated for the purpose;

 

(b) by the creditor or owner, or by a person on his behalf, outside any signature box in which the debtor or hirer may sign and, subject to sub-paragraph © below, the date of the signature shall be inserted outside any such signature box;

 

© in the case of a regulated agreement which is not a cancellable agreement, the date on which the unexecuted agreement becomes an executed agreement may be inserted in the document and in such a case any other date specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) above need not be inserted; and

 

 

hope this helps

 

Dave

  • Haha 1

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

 

Many thanks. This is great news but slightly unexpected because that wasn't one of the things I considered.

 

I'm shattered now, so I'm going to bed shortly, but I'll have another look in the morning.

 

Thanks.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

 

I've now had chance to digest what you said in your post - I was shattered last night.

 

It seems that MBNA have made a remarkable blunder. I don't want to give them any wriggle room though, so what else is there about this document that makes it unenforceable?

 

To me it looks like an application form. In addition, there are no Ts&Cs, not interest rate etc. etc. I've read through quite a few of the MBNA posts and in particular I'm re-reading the one entitled MBNA - Properly Executed Agreements.

 

Thanks again for your help.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fred

 

is this all they sent you?

 

if it is, they havent complied fully

they need to send out the T&C that were current at the time you signed, also a copy of the unexecuted agreement again at the time you signed. dont push them on this until their time limit is up, then have a right go at them :)

 

but....... as you suspect on your application there are no prescribed terms (apr, repayments, default charges etc)

 

further, is the copy as bad as it looks? if it is s)78 says that the document MUST be easily legible

 

points wrong

 

its an application form

no terms

illegible copy

signed across the box

 

hope you have fun with these cowboys

:)

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

 

Thanks again. Yes, the copy is as bad as it looks - even the box headings are barely legible, let alone the small print within them.

 

If this is all they've got then I'd say they were in a spot of bother. I'll continue to read the thread because I want to get it right. I'm looking forward to this after all the hassle I've had from them over the years.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep at them.........

 

have a look at my thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/84285-ccas-dave-against-world.html

 

in the first post I have my loan doc posted, I thought I was totally screwed.

 

but in reading the regs over and over, a possible get out appeared

 

the dates !

 

they signed before me, so it changes the nature of the agreement!

 

just waiting for my sar to come back so I can check a few things

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all. I need to send a follow up letter to MBNA regarding their failure to provide me with a properly-executed agreement.

 

I've looked all through the templates library and can't find one. Is their one?, if so, could somebody please point me in the right direction.

 

Many thanks.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...