Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

some advice please - Bank charges


rob munro
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6209 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

Like a lot of people on here I wrote to my bank (1st direct) asking for a full refund of from overdraft charges. Most of my crazy period happened while at art school some years back, when I went way over my limit.

I calculated they owed me £1152.50 I got a reply yesterday; they worked it out at £1184 which is fair enough.

 

Now they went on to say the following –

 

In circumstances where you have authorised a payment that would, if met by us, lead to your account going overdrawn or to exceed an agreed overdraft limit, we have to consider whether to make this payment. A fee payable for this service provided by the bank, details of which are clearly set out in our account terms and conditions, a copy of which was provided to you when you opened your account. We are confident of our position and believe that if your claim for a refund proceeded to court, we would successfully resist any legal challenge in relation to these fees.

 

 

Sorry if that was long-winded, the next paragraph was about being mindful of management time and legal costs and are offering me £917 back that's £162 short of the full amount. The thing is this, would they actually win in court, I mean if their charges are illegal then surely they wouldn’t stand a chance. And if they’re prepared to give me back £917 why can’t they give me back the whole amount owed?

Are they just covering they’re rear-ends and sabre rattling at me and what would happen if I wrote back asking for the full amount, could they turn round and say deals off and I end up with nothing?

 

Who else here has received this kind of letter and what should my next step be?

 

Also I have to reply within 10 working days, now does it mean if I reply asking for the full amount and it goes over those 10 days they can turn round and say “sorry your times run out”

 

 

Thank you for your time

 

rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry. They do not have a leg to stand on. They are just bluffing and hoping you will give in. You did right to ask for the full amount. None of the banks are winning in Court. very few get to Court, the banks settle beforehand.

If it went to Court, you would also be entitled to 8% statutory interest on each charge under the County Courts Act Section 69. Some people would also say that you could add contractual interest to your claim (there are various threads on this forum about that, but if you want to claim contractual interest you should make it part of your claim in your letters to the bank now before it gets as far as submitting the Court claim form.

Incidentally I believe the correct term for the charges is 'unlawful', not 'illegal'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Calculator, I'm worried about only having 10 working days to apply for my £917, if i want the full amount can't they just wait till the 10 day offer period is up and say something like "your time is up all deals are off"

It's taken them just over a week to reply to my orignal claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to remember one thing-YOU are the one who calls the shots,not the bank.If you had a loan with the bank for £1200,do you think they would accept £900 as a full repayment?

 

No-me neither!!Their offer and "time limit" need to filed where they belong-the bin.

 

Go get em......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob,

 

The bank is doing everything it can to get you to give in. Don't worry about their stated time limit. They have everything to lose because if they can't get you to settle now then you can start court proceedings and claim interest on top so it will cost them more in the long run.

The banks have been playing a game with everybody since the whole question of bank chrges started. They have teams of staff trying to discourage customers from reclaiming. The banks use whatever means are necessary - usually unfair means. They are working on the basis that the majority of claimants will not have the will or the nous to start legal proceedings.

I have been assisting relatives and this week we got full settlement of our third claim after starting Court proceedings on all three. The banks involved have taken us 'round the houses' for the last 9 months with every trick in the book. We have written many times with reasoned arguments, expecting a fair and reasonable answer, but we never got it. I have come out of it a much wiser person. I would have done it differently from the start if I had known what the banks were up to. My advice now is don't stand any nonense from the bank, give them one chance and if they don't co-operate, then proceed straight to the Courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to remember one thing-YOU are the one who calls the shots,not the bank.If you had a loan with the bank for £1200,do you think they would accept £900 as a full repayment?

 

No-me neither!!Their offer and "time limit" need to filed where they belong-the bin.

 

Go get em......

 

 

Thank you, I'm going o ask for the full amount £162 is a lot of money to me.

 

 

P.S. i love your username

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Calculator

 

I've fashioned this response letter asking for the full amount, what do you any good.

Response to settlement offer

Dear 1st Direct

Thank you for your reply in regards to the unlawful bank charges, I can’t accept this offer as a Full and Final offer, as part settlement yes but not full and final. You’ve offered me £917 that’s £162 short from the full amount you owe me which is £1079 so please repay me the proper amount; you wont go bust doing so, the payment of the full amount owed is the only fair and reasonable offer there is.

I look forward to a very speedy reply, with seven days, of receiving this letter. Plus this ten working days time limit, no offence but this is on my timetable, not yours! I except that to be cancelled, thank you.

As I say I will accept the sum of £917 offered, (you can credit it straight into my account?) but only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary, Which will include the 8% interest added, I don’t think either of us really want to go that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

best to keep it simple and to the point-

Thank you for your reply in regards to the unlawful bank charges . You’ve offered me £917 in "full and final settlement" of the full amount claimed IE £1079..

 

I regret to inform you that I am not in a position to accept your offer,and

that I will now pursue the full amount claimed via the County court.

 

Yours etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...