Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
    • FTMDave - your cold light of day suspicions are correct, alas. Just had this back... Thank you for your email. I was very sorry to learn that you recently received a parking charge notice after shopping at our Kearsley Manchester Rd Express store. I appreciate this is always frustrating, especially as you'd just nipped in for the one item. I've had a look, and I can confirm that in this case the car park at this store is entirely owned by a third party - it is not owned or operated by Tesco in any way. The parking charge issued is on behalf of that third party, although I appreciate it does state Tesco on the letter. Regrettably as the car park is owned and operated by a separate company we don't have any form of influence or control over the parking charges issued. In this case, I can only recommend that you follow the appeals process outlined on the letter directly to take the matter up with UKPPO directly. I'm sorry that I cannot offer further help in this case.  Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you require anything further.  Kind regards Ewan Kelly Customer Service Specialist On behalf of the Chief Executive’s Office
    • The IMF estimates Russia's economy will grow faster than the likes of the US, UK and Germany this year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Returned Tyre purchase


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased some tyres from mytyres.co.uk - Tyres for PASSENGER CARs cheap, bargains, look + save to be delivered to an independent tyre fitter, who is listed and recommended on their site. Mytyres claim a no risk 30 day money back guarantee. The fitter was very vague about when he could fit them and kept promising to call me back, but didn't. I therefore involked the 30 day money back guarantee. Mytyres have deducted nearly £50 for carriage out of a total cost on £140. Hardly risk free! :mad:

 

I have copied their terms and conditions and discovered this buried in the website:

 

4 Legal consequences of the revocation

In case of a valid revocation, the supplies/payments received by both parties will be given back, and the possible obtained benefits (e.g. interests) will be submitted. In case you cannot give us back, partially or totally, or only in a worsen state, the received supplies, you will have, if it case, to compensate the respective value to us. In case of goods transfer, it does not apply if the depreciation of the object can be exclusively explained of its checking – as you had the possibility to do it in a shop. Otherwise, you will be able to avoid value compensation using the respective good as a good owner and giving up everything that could affect its value. Both the goods that can be sent by package, and the objects that cannot be packed can be taken from you. You will bear the return shipment expenses in case the delivery corresponds to your order and the price of the good that must be sent back does not surpass the amount of 40 Euro.

 

- End of the instructions regarding the revocation -

 

 

§ 5 Our restitution tender in 30 days term

 

We desire that you are content of all our deliveries. This is why you can give back, in 30 days term, any item bought from us. This agreement surpasses the legal conditions providing that you are entitled to revocation only in two weeks terms from the articles receipt. Our restitution tender in 30 days term makes an exception, and for a legal possibility of revocation according to § 312b BGB (/German Civil Code), the article deliveries made according to the customer’s specification. There are included here, among others, the delivery of complete wheels that we made individually for each customer.

 

Our restitution tender does not also include the shipment expenses. This means that, in case of contracts with consumers which are to be revoked after the legal revocation term expiry (between the 15th and the 30th day), a forfeit (lump sum) amount is to be charged of shipment expenses. Generally, the enterprisers bear themselves the shipment expenses. Other information, especially those regarding the shipment expenses and our restitution tender in 30 days term, can be found in the respective Internet portal.

 

Please use our transport packing. Protect the articles against the damages. The tires will be prepared for shipment after having been cleaned and will be tied two by two. Moreover the complete wheels will have to be protected in the frontal and posterior part with a sufficient amount of cardboard and band for packages. In case of damages caused by incorrect handling or by deficit packing when returning, we are entitled to request recovery of damages. The transport companies will take only sufficiently packed articles.

 

If I interperate the bit in blue correctly, if the tyres are returned within 15 days, then there is no shipping charge? The order was cancelled 10 days after placing it. Anyone care to comment? Any care to comment on how these terms would be interpreted in an English court?

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you put it in writing to them, as stated in their T&Cs

 

§ 3 Instructions concerning the revocation

You it can revoke, in two weeks term, the contract statement that you made, without mentioning the reasons, in text form (for example fax, email). The term runs more early beginning with the date of the articles receipt. In order to frame in the revocation term, it is enough to send on time the revocation or the goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it was done by email.

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

This sounds to me like it has been very badly translated from a German or contintal document. like Pkea said i would have a liook at the distance selling regulations they are on the web.

 

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a poor translation from German. That is why I am asking for help in understanding the bit in blue... I have looked at the distance selling regulations and they appear to have breached it's requirements i.e. not defining clearly the cost of returning the goods.

 

Does anyone think it reasonable to charge given their 'no risk' guarantee?

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long after receiving the goods was the order cancelled?

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The order was cancelled 10 days (elapsed) after placing it.

;)

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just had an email confirming that they will refund the whole amount. Case closed! :)

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...