Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft CCA Request


Catchleen
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had a look through the site and can't see if anyone else has had this before - I sent the template letter to Moorcroft with a postal order for £1 asking for a copy of the signed CCA relating to my Next Directory debt. They have replied saying "we can confirm that on this occasion we are unable to provide a copy of the signed Credit Agreement for the above account as we are no longer dealing on the above account. Please forward all future queries and payments direct to our client". They have returned the PO.

I'm probably being thick but does "our client" then mean Next Directory? And what should I do next - do I contact Next Directory or wait for them to get in contact with me?

Any help or advise would be gratefully received...

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi catchleen, this has also happened to me, over in the debt collection agencies section you will find a few people dealing with moorcroft.

mine is in connection with a catalogues with littlewoods. you might find some usefull information in my thread has i have had some great advice of people on here

caa requests not provided,help please this is my thread,

good luck to you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This fairly typical of Moorcroft. I would just send a CCA request to Next Directory as they are the creditor and obviously have not sold the debt. I wouldn't wait for Next to get in touch with you as this just delays matters.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

After Moorcroft returned the account to Next, I then received letters from Roxburgh and CCA'd them. I didn't get an agreement back and when they had defaulted, I sent Next a non compliance letter with a deadline of 20 July.

I have now received 2 letters from Next. The first one is dated 21 March 2007, received 10 Aug, and the second letter received on the same day isn't dated at all!

The first letter says "I write to confirm that Next does not hold a signed credit agreement for you ... this debt is therefore unenforceable. We must inform you however that we have received legal advice that an unenforceable debt is still a debt. The goods that have been charged to your account have been ordered by and delivered to you, without payment in full having been made for them. Therefore your account remains in debt to Next Directory. In light of this, and in the absence of any evidence to suggest that you did not order and/or receive the goods delivered, Next will continue to see payment of the balance of £ owed by you. (they left the amount blank). A default entry will therefore be made on your credit reference file, which may affect your ability to obtain credit. Making payment to clear the balance will enable your credit files to show as satisfied."

The second letter then states "The above account that remains unpaid by the amount as indicated is being prepared for sale to an external Debt Collection Agency who, post this sale, will legally own the debt. To prevent this action and subsequent collections activity, please telephone Next Directory Collections Dept on 0844 ... between 12 & 5 Mon 13th to Thurs 16th Aug with your proposal for payment. This line will cease to be in operation from 5pm Thursday 16th at which point, should no communication have been received, the account will be sold."

My understanding is that without a CCA, they cannot enforce the debt as they state, but they can't sell it either. So their second letter is contradicting that. Also, because they wrote "balance of £ owed by you" and left the amount blank, are they writing it off or just lazy? I can't really afford a monthly payment at the moment so had planned to wait for a few months until our situation gets better and then offer a final settlement, but if they are going to sell it, then I won't bother. Has anyone had this before and any ideas what I should do? Any help appreciated x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next haven't got a CCA and therefore, cannot legally pursue you for payment. They are saying that they are now going to sell the debt on.... but without a CCA. whoever is stupid enough to buy it won't be able to enforce it either. :D

 

Whether they sell it or not remains to be seen... For now, it sounds as if they are just trying to intimidate you into making payments...

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had the same reply from moorcroft regarding cap1 too and have just sent a cca request to the second dca that are trying to claim it. will wait to see what they say lol.

 

i dont really mind if one man and his dog try to collect it coz they dont have a hope i'm just worried about how many £1's i'll end up sending out :p

 

let us know if you make that complaint and what happens.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont really mind if one man and his dog try to collect it coz they dont have a hope i'm just worried about how many £1's i'll end up sending out :p

 

 

You don't need to keep on sending CCA requests out to different DCAs... if the account is still in dispute with the 1st one.

 

If you prefer, you can write (rec. delivery) to anyone who pesters you from now on, pointing out that a CCA request was received by xxxx on xx/xx/2007 and until such times as they are able to comply with your legal request for info. the account remains in dispute and is unenforceable.

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies - I thought that they couldn't sell it on without a CCA but then when I got the letter, I started to doubt myself - but no more!!! Good point about the £1 PO's all the time, I'll remember that. I was going to set up a payment of a few quid but I'm not going to bother now, they can go to the back of the queue :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...