Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Helja vs Barclays


swanseastu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6097 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, little bit nervous as ive got over £4000 easily from Halifax and now taking on Barclays for my financee.

 

We are at the MCOL stage and I have filed a claim for only £800 odd.

 

Today we have recieved the following from Northamption County Court wth the following documents.

 

1) Notice of Transfer of Proceedings - stating that a defence to our claim has been filed and that the claim has been transferred to the court where the claimant lives. The paragraph on this document relating to the allocation questionaire has been crossed out.

 

2) The second document, is an order before a districrt judge in Northampton without hearing and the order states " The filing of an allocation questionairre be dispensed with unless the district judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise" Note.Any party affected by this order may apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed. Such a party must apply within 14days of service. (order drawn 13/4/07)

 

3) the 3rd document worries me a bit more, its the defence and counterclaim document, completed as follows

Section 1 - I dispute the whole clim

Section 2 - No

Section 3 Defence - in this section and continued over on 2 more pages is there defence with 11 sections of defence. I hoping this is all standard defence statments but would love to hear that others have these 11 paragraphs of defence.

section 4 - Blank

Section 5 - Signed Adrian St John

 

Hopefully someone can confirm this is all normal and that all I have to do is sit and wait for a hearing date in my local court? I dont think I have to do anything else?

 

Ive followed all the guidance, templates etc supplied here and on MSE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all very standard,

Your AQ stage has been dispensed with as is becoming the norm now. you will next get your court date along with directions.

 

nearly there!!!!

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all very standard,

Your AQ stage has been dispensed with as is becoming the norm now. you will next get your court date along with directions.

 

nearly there!!!!

 

Thats good to hear, we have stuck with Halifax (that was so easy) and then with Marbles (bit harder, but still easy) but these have raised a bit more doubt in my mind.

 

This is the first one we have have to take to the court stage. Just read the 12 paragraphs of defence agaion and the more i read them, the more they seem standard, starting with us not providing the details of the precise charges in the particular of the claim, through to number 12, which just seems to be a riddle.....:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you have your notification of the court, send in an updated SOC to both Barclays at Churchill Place and the court [by recorded delivery]

 

SOC - Statement of Charges? - including interest upto the date i raised it, including Court Costs, and any personal costs? Postage, £10 Data Request etc I assume?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything you're trying to claim back!

 

Don't be nervous, Barclays may be more stubborn than other banks, but they always fold in the end.

And yes, sounds like you got the standard 'one size fits all' defence!

 

Nearly there now!

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, i think thats what it means, starts off in the alternative, and without predidjuce, and then goes down hill from there. I glad you roughly translated it, cause i thought it could be used a clue from the old tv programme 3-2-1 - where you could win dusty bin:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had a reply today from the Cardiff County Court as follows:

 

General form of Judgement or order

 

Before District Judge XXXXon XXX at xxxx

 

Upon the courts own motion. The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. Ifg you object to the order you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

ITS IS ORDERED THAT

 

1) Directions will be given in this case by Designated Civil Judge his honour Judge XXX on 14th August at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

 

2) The Parties may appear in person or make written repsentations as to how the case should proceed provioded a copy of the representation is sent to the court and other side at least 7 days prior to the hearing.

 

 

 

Any ideas guys, sounds worrying again......:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Im now 8 days away, and reading the hearing, im not sure if we need to put out anything in writing (within 7 days), or if its ok to make verbal rep's as per the links above? Just looking for clarification, my wife is very nervous about having to say something in court, any re-assurances out there? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - late night ignorance kicking in here - what you mean by stayed? we both taken a days leave from work to travel to Cardiff by train to apppear in person - is this worth it then? No comms from court grrrrrr...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi check out the cardiff thread, all claims for the 14th are stayed, ie to be heard pending the outcome of the 'test case'... give the court a ring tomorrow to double check with your claim number, I rang today as I had not received the stay letter, but told it was in the post which I expect is where yours is. The next stage is to fill in a N244 and attach the objections statement to it.. all listed in the cardiff thread. I know its a bummer!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...