Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. 
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sabine1504 - V - Abbey ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6157 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All....I was advised to start my own thread rather than my first posting "defense"....so here it goes!

 

I first wrote a letter to Abbey last October, praying on their kind nature (!) and hoping they would pay me back at least some of the money they kept deducting out of my account. At some point in January 2007 they finally replied and gave me back £70 as a good will gesture.

BUT....in the meantime I had found out that what they were doing was actually very WRONG...so I had already sent the standard letter as can be found on many websites. Of course I got the standard letter back in reply saying they would endevour to investigate my complaint within 4 weeks...etc.etc.etc....YAWN.....I won't bore you with the details, you all know those!! I then wrote back saying I would accept approx. 75% of my claim OR I would take them to court. Of course no reply so I took them to court...(YIKES, HOW SCARY)....

 

Abbey have entered a defense and have asked me to supply all details again as they are finding it difficult to locate my original claim.....hmmmm.

But this is now ready and will be sent to them tomorrow.

 

In the meantime I have also had a letter from the courts stating that Abbey has entered a defense. But it's not asking me to fill out any questionaire...infact, that part of the standard letter has been crossed out....I find that odd, as everyone I read about has had to fill one of those out? Does that mean anything?

 

Anyway, no court date yet.....no more correspondence; I suppose I have to now sit back and await Abbeys defense...

And I'm afraid.......proper girly afraid!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Hello, dont be afraid, well ok, but only a little bit.

 

The lack of an AQ seems to be more and more widespread, and is the courts way of speeding the process up, personally I think they know the banks will settle, so whats the point in them sending out pointless documents.

 

Abbey always ask for more copies of your claim details, IMO, its best to send them, its only the cost of a stamp and keeps everything above board.

 

We've all been a bit apprehensive at the thoughts of taking the bank to court, but you know they wont let it get all the way, and the satisfaction at the end is fantastic.

 

I know its hard, but try to enjoy it, after all its nice to turn the tables on Abbey isn't it.

 

Best of luck

 

louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have sent off the relevant to Abbey today. I also tried to contact the court today, but couldn't get through. It kind of worries me that their letter is so very vague. It just tells me that the case has been tranferred to my local court and that Abbey has put in a defense. It does not mention any time scales, what happens next, what I am supposed to do - if anything...... I don't like vague...:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

You will get another letter from the court you have been transfered to, with instructions as to what to do.

 

Various options open to the judge, too many to list, so post again when you have it, and we'll work out whats required.

 

It will be ok, honestly. Best of luck

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update 24-4-07..........I had a letter from my local court today saying:

 

Before District Judge D J R WEston sitting at Kingston-Upon-Hull County Court, Combined Court Centre.....

 

Under the Courts own motion. The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The Claiment to file fully paricularised particulars of claim by 4th May 2007 or the claim be struck out.

Dated 13 April 2007

 

WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT MEAN???? HELP.....................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

I think I would be inclined to phone the court first thing.

 

In the meantime, have a look to see if the info here is useful, I would have a look myself, but just finished my night shift and need sleep.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html

 

Let us know what the court says, if you have continued problems and no answers here, let me know, and I will ask a couple of people I know if they can help.

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Did you send a schedule of your charges to MCOL when you issued your claim? I saw a similar post yesterday where the claim had been struck out due to lack of evidence....not sure if this helps but thread is

 

CHLOEJ case struck out --- help.

 

(sorry still can't get my computer to add link although did yesterday!!)

 

Villafan

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's a POC? And I sent the full schedule of claim (spreadsheet) to Abbey a while back and have just resent it as they asked for it. This is the first thing the court has asked me for....I haven't had to fill in any questionaire

And I got my initial from here:

Bank charges: Reclaim them, they're unlawful, so you can get six years money back | MoneySavingExpert: Consumer Revenge, Credit Cards, Shopping, Bank Charges, Cheap Flights and more

Also, it has a template for calculating the interest.

 

I will look at the links above...........thanks people!! And I will call the court tomorrow morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please Note

REFERENCE COPY.

To be used at the Court for identification

purposes only.

signed

Claim Form

Claimant

Address for sending documents and payments (if different)

First Defendant

Particulars of Claim

Amount claimed

Court fee

Solicitor™s costs

Total amount

Issue date

Second Defendant

Court Address:

In the

County Court

Claim Number

Claim Description

Does, or will, your claim include any issues under

the Humans Rights Act 1998?

No Yes

The defendant has limited time to reply to this

claim form.

The defendant may defend this claim online.

For details see: www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk

or call 0845 6015935

I am the claimant - I believe that the facts stated in this

claim form are true.

Sabine Holliday

Bank Charges

NN1 2LH

Northampton

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

7QZ31015

Northampton

09/03/2007

3022.45

0.00

120.00

2902.45

Claimant

S. Holliday

Unlawful Bankcharges as detailed in my

letters from 26th November 2006, 16th

January 2007 and 16th February 2007.

X

MK10 1FA

abbey

Milton Keynes

PO Box 5885

40331632

 

This hasn't copied very well, and of course I have taken my address out!! :-) I'm sure you're all very nice and all....but...;-)

Anyway, I suppose I simply assumed the courts would ask for particulars (which I suppose they have now) as there was NOWHERE on the site (money claims online) to say I had to send them with the initial claim.......am I making any sense at all????

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that your POC?

 

If so you really need to amend it.

 

Use the N244 to amend the POC it will cost £35 which you can not reclaim, however its better than having the claim struck out.

 

Here is the link for the N244.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/41901-form-n244-application-notice.html

 

Here is the N1 use the POC from this and amend to suit your claim details.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, will do that tonight.....and there was me thinking I would get some ironing done:-)

Seriously, thanks for the help....I will still call the courts tomorrow and post again with what they say......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, I didn't re-submit or fill out a new form. I simply sent all my spreadsheets - together with a covering letter - to the judge.

And today I have received a letter with a court date in the small claims court for 27th June. Together with an offer of free mediation - which I will attempt to go to; although I somehow do not think someone from Abbey will ??

Think of me and wish me luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mediation is pointless - you have already tried to mediate before you filed the claim and they did not want to know. They won't pay until the court date is imminent and will view mediation as a further attempt to prevaricate and frustrate.

 

On the notice of allocation you will have directions which you need to comply with.

 

See here for help on that score, everything you need is linked -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everybody.........well, I was going to send my defense off today, seeing the court date is 27th June. BUT.....on coming home from work there is a letter from Abbey waiting for me offering me £2500!!! And hell yes I will accept, thank you very much:-)

And I was CONVINCED I would go to court and lose!!

Thanks all!!! xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...