Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Justlaugh2 V Lloyds TSB


justlaugh2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello to all,

 

I have become an avid reader of these threads and also the MSE site since starting the process with Lloyds at the beginning of Feb 2007.

 

Unfortunately I started the process after recieving an email from a company who said they could do it all for me and the pound signs started flashing before my eyes, so very stupidly i agreed to let them do this for me ( i had no idea that i could do this myself or how much i had paid in charges over the years )

In the meantime I found out that i could do this myself and became an avid reader of all the success stories on here.

Thats when I went to online banking and trawled through the statements going back 5 1/2 years, when i added it all up the charges totalled £4714.00

At the end of march i called up this company and asked them how my claim was going, to which i was told that they hadn't received my statements yet and also told i was being impatient. This was when i told them i wanted to cancel the agreement and they were not happy!

They said that even if i cancelled i was still had to pay them 25% of anything i received! ( all they had done was send a letter requesting statements at this point)

My next step was to ask a solicitor friend to draft a couple of letters for me cancelling the agreement with them and also a letter for the bank saying i would be dealing with this matter myself from now on.

I then received a reply from the company saying they would accept £350 to cancel agreement! Bloody cheek! I have so far ignored this as i have also spoken to the bank to make sure they do not send any correspondence to them.

 

27th March I sent my letter to Lloyds ( using letter from BBc website) giving them 14 days to refund charges or i would take them to court.

About a week later i received their standard reply saying it would take them 4 weeks to look into it.

 

On 12th April I filed my claim at the county court for £4714.00 + £590.00 interest ( statutory) This was served on Lloyds on 21st April.

 

I now think i may have made a mistake with the N1 form as in the value I put £4714.00 + £590.00 interest ( using the wording from the template) but in the box on bottom righthand corner where it says total I only put in £4714.00 I didnt add the interest on as I thought that the court will award this and it wasnt up to me to add it on yet ( also the interest will be different by the time the bank pay up)

 

So if anyone knows if this is wrong or right could they advise me so i can make amendments before too much time passes.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well

lloyds time is up today to acknowledge my claim! They have until today 8th May to acknowledge and so far ive heard nothing!

 

Can i file for judgement today?

 

Or do I have to wait until tomorrow?

 

Or do they have another 14 days?

 

Any help would be appreciated, Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would give them until the end of the week, then come back on and tell us if they still haven't acknowledged.

What address did you put for Lloyds on your claim form by the way?

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I put the Gresham Street address on the N1 form.I called the court and found out that they havent acknowledged yet, It will be very hard waiting until the end of the week. Too impatient. But maybe i will give them another couple of days.Thanks for replying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took my request for judgement straight in to court office on Wednesday 9th May.

I rang the court on Friday to see if lloyds had acknowledged late ( they hadnt)

But so far my request for judgement hasnt been issued, does annyone know how long this usually takes and what happens next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, It took about 5 days before the court sent me my judgement by default. What happens next is the tricky bit. Lloyds can apply for a set aside and delay things further. If they don't, you write to them asking for your money. If they don't pay you get a warrant of execution and start the bailif process. It's really not the best route to go down but I've seen a few threads recently where they have neither defended or acknowledged. Just too busy/useless I suppose. Have a look for aircushionbaloon and mrTbone's threads. They are usefull guides as to what you can expect

Barclays - 2 Accounts - WON

Capital 1 - WON with CI

LTSB - WON

LTSB pre 6 years - N1 for non compliance filed

Barclays pre 6 years - Prelim sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called the court again this morning to find out if judgement has been issued yet.

Was told that the court are still working on cases from 3rd May and that i should wait another 10-14 days. This means that Lloyds may have indeed acknowledged the claim but the overloaded court havent got to it yet.

 

I thought I was near the end of my claim, but now it looks as if it could be quite a few weeks before I see any money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I got my judgment request sent back to me !!

 

dated 16th May

 

Letter says;

 

your request for judgment in the above case is being returned because;

 

the amount on your request differs from that as stated in the claim form, please amend the request or explain the discrepancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With some help from a solicitor friend. this was my reply:

 

Thank you for your letter dated 16 May

 

My copy of the claim form shows the " Total Amount" section in the bottom right hand box was not actually completed. This was due to my oversight for which i apologise, however i was not alerted to this when i attended the courts issuing desk.

The figure that should have been inserted for the Total amount is £5295.64. It is however set out and broken down in the "Value" section of the first page of the claim form ie; £4714.00 charges +interest of £581.64.

 

The sum claimed on the request for judgment (5322.83) is therefore made up of £5295.64 plus further interest for the period between date of issue and the request for judgment (27.19)

 

I trust that explains the discrepancy and hereby return the request for judgment to be actioned by the court. I apologise for any confusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved Acknowledgment of service on 22nd May which was filed on 14th May ( 6 days late!)

 

Im getting really frustrated that the Court paperwork is taking so long ( they have a 2 week backlog) . I know they must be so busy with all the Bank charge reclaiming!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received my judgment ( by default) agaist Lloyds!!

Dated 6th June, i faxed it to their solicitors and followed it up with a phonecall. Solicitor said they have to wait on instructions from the bank in case they want to apply for a set aside.

claim issued 21/04/07

judgment requested on 9/05/07

Judgment returned to me for amending 16/05/07

Claim acknowledged 14/05/07

Judgment request re sent 20/05/07

Judgment issued 06/06/07

 

No defence has been filed in the mean time, can they still apply to set the judgment aside? even though they should have defended by 22/05/07???

 

Thanks in advance for any comments/help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...