Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paypals new rival!!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been using it for around 10 months now (for US transactions) and it works well - but some CC are treating purchases as cash advances, so one to watch). Apart from that, eBay's decision to block other payment systems was fine when there were security issues, but simply because the provide consumer choice is something the regulators may want to look into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If ebay doesn't watch out, we will see a google bay or something. The guys at google currently have very very deep pockets indeed.

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rich~ Google it, erm... adsense dont pay up, adsense terminated my account without reason... something on those lines, unless google has filtered them you will find loads of them.

 

They even tried to terminate my adsense account simply because someone was viewing my site too much - claiming click fraud or something - even though this person never clicked on an advert - as the adsense is javascript i suppose they got a small increase in hits by that user - nothing under my control, nothing that would jepordise their servers stability or anything - my shared with a thousand other people hosting managed to survive it - i mean google could have simply blocked that users IP.

 

I mean my website was far from the most popular on the internet (understatement) and if some of the big sites can have adsense and be fine, then why were they picking on a small site? Simply because if they do it to loads of them they save alot of money - we dont have money to take them to court - i would call that evil, personally...

 

Anyway, after it being suspended for a month (lost earnings and freeze on payouts) i finally got it over turned, all the hassle to make a few quid from your website...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rich~ Google it, erm... adsense dont pay up, adsense terminated my account without reason... something on those lines, unless google has filtered them you will find loads of them.

 

Yes, our club website had adsense and our account was terminated in a similar manner. No appeal. Easy to see how google became so rich! :mad:

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, yes but that hardly qualifies the statement "Evil" though does it?

 

There's obviously something wrong and I have no particular love of Google or for that matter Microsoft but refering to them as Evil doesnt really help matters and potentially turns people off from listening.

 

Lets try to keep some perspective :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the funny thing is...

 

Microsoft declares themself as a huge corporate company who are determined to make as much profit as possible by selling software to which rivals dont even come close to them. The anti-trust competition is solely because nothing beats Windows and Office....

 

Google... people still think its some bloke from a university who setup a non-profit organisation to make the web easier to find stuff on... (i disagree with that now) you know a course work assignment or something.

 

Animalmagic, glad someone can confirm, and thats what i am talking about, regardless of if you are in the right or wrong, (which you were in the right)

...you surely have the right to appeal and/or question the decision. This is fraud and theft as... it is all account based, you earnt that money fair and square - so even if you were doing something wrong then surely you are entitled to get a pay cheque...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microsoft declares themself as a huge corporate company who are determined to make as much profit as possible by selling software to which rivals dont even come close to them. The anti-trust competition is solely because nothing beats Windows and Office....

 

Wrong. Plenty beats Windows and Office. The anti-trust issue is more to do with Microsoft selling Windows to manufacturers for peanuts on the condition that their machines ship with Windows and nothing else (potentially crossing the line from hard bargaining to economic duress), and the bundled Web browser giving them an unfair market advantage gleaned entirely from inertia. Microsoft's product line is mixed at best - Visual Studio and the C# programming language are pretty good, IIS and Exchange are not brilliant, SourceSafe is so horrendous MS has practically disowned it, and Windows Vista has simultaneously missed the boat (with its scheduled release in 2003 originally put back to 2005) and arrived too soon (the high-spec hardware required to run it well isn't widely available).

 

Courts in the US and EU have decided that their bundling of Internet Explorer with Windows is unfair, yet the integration is so tight that Microsoft actually finds it cheaper to simply pay what is equivalent to a million dollars in fines every day than to re-engineer IE or the Windows shell to unpick the two.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

With Web 2.0 the OS requires integration with a web browser. The fact Windows started with IE as a bolt-on is immaterial, and the EU's position remains untenable in the light of server-based applications.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With Web 2.0 the OS requires integration with a web browser.

 

Complete and utter poppycock. It certainly doesn't require integration to the degree that your Web browser doubles up as your shell application.

 

the EU's position remains untenable in the light of server-based applications.

 

I'm having difficulty in parsing this sentence due to it making absolutely no sense whatsoever. Can you elaborate?

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong. Plenty beats Windows and Office. The anti-trust issue is more to do with Microsoft selling Windows to manufacturers for peanuts on the condition that their machines ship with Windows and nothing else (potentially crossing the line from hard bargaining to economic duress), and the bundled Web browser giving them an unfair market advantage gleaned entirely from inertia. Microsoft's product line is mixed at best - Visual Studio and the C# programming language are pretty good, IIS and Exchange are not brilliant, SourceSafe is so horrendous MS has practically disowned it, and Windows Vista has simultaneously missed the boat (with its scheduled release in 2003 originally put back to 2005) and arrived too soon (the high-spec hardware required to run it well isn't widely available).

 

Courts in the US and EU have decided that their bundling of Internet Explorer with Windows is unfair, yet the integration is so tight that Microsoft actually finds it cheaper to simply pay what is equivalent to a million dollars in fines every day than to re-engineer IE or the Windows shell to unpick the two.

 

lol! meagain, what beats windows and office? you going to tell me linux and openoffice? :D hehe joker!

 

You would be ****ed off to get windows and have to download everything other then its core, ironically i have linux distributions and god damn, do you know how many programmes are included with them?!?!

 

Microsoft in Europe brought out Windows XP N, windows XP without WMP.

 

Talking of the IE debate, who started the debate off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol! meagain, what beats windows and office? you going to tell me linux and openoffice?

 

No, I'm going to tell you that Windows is not the best operating system out there (I'm probably making a big jump in assuming you know what an "operating system" is, and the difference between the OS and userspace programs).

 

You would be ****ed off to get windows and have to download everything other then its core, ironically i have linux distributions and god damn, do you know how many programmes are included with them?!?!

 

This statement is flawed, in that is has absolutely FA to do with the concept of anti-competitive practices on the part of Microsoft or (as was originally raised) eBay.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

My OH prefers linux because he controls what goes into the systems he's building. He can download and customise to a high degree what this system is going to be used for, what that system will do... The only reason I stick with a PC atm is because if you're a gamer, linux will cripple you - most PC games are geared specifically towards running in Windows, and I've got a lot more to learn before I start trying to get them to work on another OS.

 

EDIT: Another anti-competition tactic from Micros***? Or games publishers too scared to break out and design a game for the game's sake, not for the money they'll make out of it? **Cough cough EA Games I'm lookin' at you cough**

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...