Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hobnail you don't know Elms too well yet. I am surprised that they got as close as they did to adding up to 30. I think the poor dears get confused because most other letters they send out are to give 28 days notice. They even  have difficulty with their two times table and often consult with the char lady to confirm that 2 plus 2 equals 4.  Just act on the notion that they are total numpties and you won't be far out.
    • To carry on from the above post it may be helpful to go through their WS using their numbers. 9] motorists do NOT accept the contract when entering the land. First they have to read it and understand it and then they realise that a] "No stopping" is prohibitive and cannot offer a contract. b] the signs around the bus stop do not mention who issued the No Stopping signs so it could not have been issued by VCS since the IPC CoP states that their signs should include the IPC logo and the creditor be identified.  10]There is no mention of £100 charge for breaching the No stopping request or if there is it is far too small to read even for a pedestrian. 11] no matter how often VCS say it, it is NOT a contractual clause   22]" the claimant has given the Defendant its contractual licence to enter the site". No it hasn't. This is a road leading to the airport. All sorts of people are going to the airport-travellers, taxis, fuel bowsers, airport staff, companies delivering food and drink for each aircraft, air traffic controllers, buses. It is absolutely ridiculous to attribute VCS wth any sort of permissions. The land owners yes, but not VCS . There can be no sort of analogy between a car park and a major thoroughfare where VCS have no place as it is not relevant land.   23] there can be no contract as there is no offer only a prohibition. And it is not relevant land no matter how Mr Walli attempts to prove otherwise. 25] VCS may have won a few times but none quoted was on an airport covered by the RTA and its own Byelaws. They also have lost more cases than they have won using their prohibitive signs. 26] First one has to consider if there is a contract. Is it relevant land? No. Does a valid contract exist betweer VCS and Peel? NO.  27] the signage at the bus stop may show the conditions ie  no stopping, and restricted zone but not the terms ie is there a charge for stopping and who is the creditor. The last section of the sign is illegible  29] already stated that a WS between VCS and peel is not a valid document 31] it will need more than the Claimants feather to outweigh the case against the Defendant no matter who was driving. 32] there is no law of agency involved. This is not a case of employer/employedd relationship. VCS are muddying the waters because they have no way of transferring the driver's liability to the keeper 33] this a red herring. There is no list of highways at all  on the Highways act 1980 so this is a deliberate strategy to debunk the fact that this road is not relevant land. VCS are put to strict proof that it is relevant land not covered by the Road Traffic Act nor by Byelaws. 34] there ican be no comparison between a railway station and an airport. Totally fatuous analogy.  35] yes the landowners can bring in their own terms but what the cannot do is overrule Byelaws and the Road Traffic Act. 39] surely the paralegal cannot be that ignorant of PoFA. If Bye Laws are involved then the bus stop is not relevant land and so the specious argument about FGW is rubbish   36] what on earth is he talking about with Permits. There is no mention of permits on the signage and even if there were  would it mean that Permit holders were allowed to stop on No Stopping roads? There are enough examples on CAG to counter act their idiocy on continuing charging the extra £60   46] VCS had NO reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA for the Defendants details. No valid  contract with the landowners No stopping is prohibitive therefore cannot form a contract the event happened on a bus stop over which VCS has no jurisdiction the signage either does not show that there was a charge of £100 for stopping, or the font size was too small for a motorist to be able to read it  the signage does not show the Creditor which fails the IPC CoP so not valid the WS contract does not appear to authorise VCS to pursue motorists to Court Given all these factors it seems that VCS have breached the GDPR of the Defendant quite substantially and it would appear right that an exemplary award is made against VCS in the hope that they will drop all further cases at Doncaster airport where they are pursuing motorists on non relevant land.   48] what is this guy on? You weren't in a car park you were on a bus stop 59] this case is totally without merit. I am not surprised that the paralegal will not be turning up. Some statements are pretty close to perjury and others are designed to mislead or misdirect. None of the analogies seem appropriate or relevant. Could have been said in at least half the time without the repetition and trying to make a case where none was there. One particularly bad example of misdirection was in the photographs. The Clearway sign shown near the bus stop is very unclear  unlike the Clearway sign two photos before it which may well include terms and conditions. The one by the bus stop is totally different.      
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote...   your defence doesnt need any return of docs.. carefully read what has been posted here and in the other threads i pointed to in your old thread merged here too.   redwood/harwood or STA or brachers.   just use our enhanced google search box.   uni fees is useful too.   this guy is just in front of you    
    • Tech firm CEO Jeff Lawson warns bosses not to make hasty judgements about their employees.View the full article
    • I have just spent last few hours registering and signing up and filling in all the details.   Below is a POC I have drafted.   The defendant is a parcel delivery company DPD (UK) LIMITED On 09/08/2021 the defendant agreed to deliver the claimant's parcel containing a PlayStation 5 Disc Version value £530, to an address in the UK. The delivery fee of £7.79 was paid by the claimant. Parcel tracking number: ???????? Parcel reference no: ????????? The defendant failed to deliver the parcel and have reported it as lost on 20/08/2021. The defendant refuses to refund the full value of the item and the delivery fee. The claimant seeks £530 being the value of the item, £7.79 delivery cost and legal fees.        (Sorry for being stupid but this POC is supposed to go where it says    " Claim details Why you believe you’re owed the money: " right? Reason why I'm asking is because I don't see anywhere it specifically says what are your particulars of claim)   Tomorrow being the 15th day, I will be ready to click it off (assuming the POC is ok)    I have read a few more hermes/packlink etc stories where they were resolved and gives me hope I will regain my lost money.  Will carry on reading up as much as I can.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

SRJ Dedt recov, bullies


gav2504
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can someone help as i am new to this and its doing my nut in. And so many of you seem to know your stuff.

 

I have had a letter from SRJ Debt recoveries for a debt of £925.00 owing to powergen from over 2 years ago. Whilst i new i did owe powergen money i never thought it was this amount. I have spoken to powergen and the outstanding balance has been adjusted to £600.00. Powergen have sent me writen confirmation of this which i have sent to SRJ. I arranged, or more forced to pay £30.00 per month to SRJ to stop them taking me to court and also explained about the adjustment to £600.00.

 

I have made one payment of £30.00 but cannot afford to pay this ammount each month and have missed a payment. i rang SRJ to tell them this but they did not want to know and i was spoken to like a piece of s#**. And was basically told 'well if you cant make the payment tough, were taking you to court and baliffs will come and collect the debt. I dont care what happens from here'.

 

It all heated up when i asked for written evidence that they are acting on behalf of powergen. Which to me seemed odd.

 

The letters they have been sending me still has the old balance of £925.00 on them even though over the phone they acknowledge this is incorrect but cannot change it until powergen tell them themselves.

They have not bought the debt i was told they are acting on behalf of powergen, however on their letters they state their client is TDX GROUP LTD.

 

Im not in anyway trying to get out of paying this debt i just dont want all this going to court and dont really understand what is going to happen.

 

i really hope someone can help many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gav2504,to be honest not sure about a utilities bill with regards a debt collection agency,there seems to be some confusion as to how much is actually owed to them :confused:

 

Firstly how was the figure of £925 arrived at, have you a bill or letter claiming this amount?

 

Then they knock it to £600 and powergen confirm this,well send a copy of powegens letter back to the DCA saying its £600 then this is your reply to the DCA claiming £925.

 

The other thing to do is if the DCA is threatening to take you to court is let them issue a claim against you and then you can submit a defense contesting the amount,also if you cannot afford £30 a month then you can submit an income and expenditure form to the court which would have a realistic payment offer that you can afford,i doubt a court would make you pay an amount which is unaffordable.

 

In my opinion the DCA is miffed that you could not stick to your original offer so is turning the screw to try to make you pay the £30,i know the debt would be paid off quicker but if £10 is all you can afford or even a token payment of £1 until you get yourself sorted out would be a start.

 

Also if a bill is in dispute contact the watchdog for the industry not sure but it could be energywatch also it might be worth seeing your local CAB about it,in any case complain about it.

 

The problem with phoning is often when you are angry and upset the DCA just pursue you even more,i would get back in control and just contact them by Snail mail :) saying you dispute the original demand.

 

Hope this helps you

 

Regards S

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks stormo for your reply, I had another phone call today from them which i thought was odd because yesterday they told me 'its out of our hands now, we dont want to know'. They were asking the same old stuff, and telling me 'pay us or your going to court' blah blah blah so i told them do what you have to do, and i will be getting in touch with Trading standards first thing mon morn and hung up. 15 mins later the phone rang, it was the accounts manager, who could not of been any more sorry, saying 'it shouldnt of got like this' and 'please send in the amended bill from powergen again, we will put your account on hold until we have updated our system with the new balance, cup of tea polish your shoes' I couldnt believe it. This was the same person who yesterday told me he didnt care its out of his hands now as he was taking me to court. One mention of trading standards and what a turn around, now they want to listen and help. well stuff you M. Faithfull of SRJ i will still be ringing trading standards, you didnt want to listen yesterday, well i dont want to listen to you today just cause you know full well of how many guidlines you have broken.. Anyone who is being hounded by any of these people and who is worried sick because of the tactics they employ, just spend some time reading up on this site and get yourself clued up and dont let them bully you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not being 1 to blow my own trumpet :roll: I knew nothing when I found this site, and yesterday, I claimed my first total rollover victory! Keep at them!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/59620-diskmandave-lowell-finacial-capone.html

 

Regards, Dave.

If my post was helpful don't forget to click the star!

Advice is offered freely, without liability and without prejudice.

If in any doubt professional legal advice should be sought.

 

I do not profess to be in any way legally trained, I am a big

oily truck driver and all I know has been learned within the

Consumer Action Group.

 

FAQ's

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

 

Trying to stop smoking?

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/give-up-smoking-here/

 

A dummies guide to the forums

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

--

KEEP WILDLIFE IN THE WILD

http://www.bornfree.org.uk

BORN FREE FOUNDATION

--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gav2504

thats ok glad you have stood your ground :)

i would mention the problems you have had with this company to TS but you have at least got the DCA to accept you have sorted it out,with proof from PGEN.

 

Hope you get a lower monthly payment as this is your main objective so that the debt is more affordable,also when things get better you might be able to pay more towards this.

 

good luck regards S

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
thanks stormo for your reply, I had another phone call today from them which i thought was odd because yesterday they told me 'its out of our hands now, we dont want to know'. They were asking the same old stuff, and telling me 'pay us or your going to court' blah blah blah so i told them do what you have to do, and i will be getting in touch with Trading standards first thing mon morn and hung up. 15 mins later the phone rang, it was the accounts manager, who could not of been any more sorry, saying 'it shouldnt of got like this' and 'please send in the amended bill from powergen again, we will put your account on hold until we have updated our system with the new balance, cup of tea polish your shoes' I couldnt believe it. This was the same person who yesterday told me he didnt care its out of his hands now as he was taking me to court. One mention of trading standards and what a turn around, now they want to listen and help. well stuff you M. Faithfull of SRJ i will still be ringing trading standards, you didnt want to listen yesterday, well i dont want to listen to you today just cause you know full well of how many guidlines you have broken.. Anyone who is being hounded by any of these people and who is worried sick because of the tactics they employ, just spend some time reading up on this site and get yourself clued up and dont let them bully you

 

 

hahahaha, seriously, what guidelines have been broken here?

sounds like none to me, unless there's parts of the story you're not telling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...