Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lyndsey vs Natwest


linzi2011
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6108 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

im no expert but i would write a letter informing them of your recent win and ask for your money back!

 

you'll probably get no response and at that point i would start the whole claim process off again and once you win it. take your buisness elsewhere

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have successfully claimed for a 2nd time against Natwest. ;)

 

Follow the same procedure as before.

 

Y

Credit Cards

Barclaycard -WON! Amex - WON! MBNA (x2) - WON!

Mint - WON! Monument - WON! Morgan Stanley - WON!

Egg - WON! Halifax - WON! Sainsbury's Bank - WON!

Citi Cards -WON!

 

Banks

 

08/06/06 Claim against NatWest started.

01/11/06 Case Closed :)

 

08/06/06 Claim against Halifax started

24/08/06 Case closed :)

 

 

Visit my forum: http://www.planet-watch.org/forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Linzi, did the money go into your account?

Can't see why you can't claim any charges gone on your account since you started your claim, as a seperate claim.

The full and final settlement was applying to your claim at the time, not anything in the future.

Go for it!!!!

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi linzi,

 

Any charges incurred since your original claim begun will have to be requested as a seperate issue.

 

Natwest done exactly the same to me and I meerly wrote to the powers at be at the Borehamwood address advising them that I had just accepted a settlement offer but had incurred additional charges. I basically asked them to pay up (in the nicest possible way and shown in the letter below) or I would have no choice but to commence court proceedings all over again. Needless to say they paid up:D

 

Dear sir/ Madame.

 

I have today received a cheque from RBS Group Litigation Department in the sum of £xxxx in settlement of my claim for recovery of unlawful bank charges.

 

This settlement does not address the issue of charges added to my account since the commencement of my claim, a total of £xxxxx

 

Clearly it would be senseless to resort to further litigation to recover this amount, although I am prepared to do so if necessary. In order to avoid such action, I require reimbursement of the aforementioned sum within 7 days of the date of this letter. If the full amount is not credited to my account within that time I will issue further proceedings against you.

 

I look forward to receiving your response before xxxxxxxx.

 

Hope this helps and good luck with whatever you decide to do.;)

:DSUCCESSESS:D

NATWEST01&02 won over 4k

See how

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-successes/31683-muggins73-natwest.html

 

:)CURRENT CLAIMS:)

HALIFAX03

19-SEPT-07 APPLICATION TO HAVE STAY LIFTED

02-OCT-07 APPLICATION REFUSED

LLOYDS TSB04

10-MAY-07 LBA

 

ABBEY05

19-SEPT-07 LBA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hello i have just recieved this response to my 2nd claim the start of the letter just says that they believe their charges are fair but then it goes on to say this:

 

As a gesture of good will without admission of liability or errorwe are prepared to offer the amount of £357 in full and final settlement of your complaint.

 

By advancing your claim for repayment of these charges, it is evident that you do not accept the validity of the charging structure which applies on your existing current account, etc,etc.

 

If you would rather continue with your existing accounts on their present terms then you should withdraw your complaint.

 

If on reflection you decide that you would still like to retain your existing banking arrangements we would be happy to allow you to continue with your current account on the existing terms. You will however appreciate that if you decide to accept the present charging structure, that would not be consistent with the basis of your complaint. So if you choose this option we would expect you to withdraw you claim for repayment of overdraft charges.

 

 

If i want my money it then goes on to give me 3 options:

 

Existing account with an additional monthly management fee and reduced overdraft charges

 

we would be happy to allow you to keep your existing account but with additional monthly management fee of £10 and reduced overdraft charges

 

It goes on to say that the account wont change, i can keep my cards but i have to pay £10 a month for it

 

I can downgrade to a cash account but this is no good as i have a loan and it needs to be paid from a NatWest account.

 

OR

I can leave NatWest altogether. I'd love to do this but because of the loan i cant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

Has anyone else had this letter and could someone please help me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, congratulations on your second win! Regardless of the rest of their letter, I think you can claim a victory by taking on one of the biggest banks in the UK and winning twice!!

 

With regards to their letter though, I honestly haven't seen this one before at all. They're obviously annoyed that you've reclaimed from them yet again.

 

Surely they can still take the loan payment from your account even with a basic account??? Phone them and check if they can do this - as if they can you could then downgrade your account, move to another bank with all inc/exp and merely deposit the loan money into the nat west account each month.

 

I certainly wouldn't be held over a barrel by them and be forced to pay £10 per month merely for the pleasure of banking with them - and I certainly wouldn't withdraw your request to have your charges funded merely to retain your current banking facilities.

 

Phone them asap - and post back to let us know how you get on. Best of luck xx ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can downgrade to a cash account but this is no good as i have a loan and it needs to be paid from a NatWest account.

QUOTE]

 

By this I assume they mean a step account which yo ucan set up SO and DD's on. I paid my loan from a HSBC wheb I changed last year - they disputed it but I challenged it and asked where I agred to this and they caved in.

 

OR

I can leave NatWest altogether. I'd love to do this but because of the loan i cant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/

 

See above

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

no, to downgrade it means just a cash account which you cant have DD or SO going out and no card!! don't understand what the point of the account is cause you cant do anything with it and you can only get money out if you go in a branch. Now because of the court case i have to have another offer letter sent to me, surely now they cant offer me an account that will cost £10 a month with charges reduced to £17 because the court case will probably put them lower that that anyway?

I'll post as soon as i recieve the offer letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

This sounds a bit bizzare!

 

Am I right in thinking they want you to pay them £10 a month and if you go overdrawn, they will only charge you £17???!!!

 

Surely this is maddness?

I must have misread something.

 

Follow Gizmo's advice and change banks,

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...