Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

E&L Pet Insurance - anyone else had problems?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out policies on our cat and dog earlier this year (2008). Sadly, our cat developed hyperthyroidism in August and had to have his thyroid glands removed in September. The initial vets bill was quite substantial thus I claimed on the insurance policy. After a rocky start with what seemed like an age waiting for E&L to accept liability, they finally paid out and I have just received the second cheque for the continuation of treatment with no quibble or question whatsoever. In hindsight, I think I may have been somewhat impatient in expecting an instant response at the start of the claim but the bottom line is that I have now been reimbursed for the whole amount (£600 so far) which is not bad considering the whole process has only taken just over 1 month and that the policy was only taken out in January.

 

I have to speak as I find and thus far I cannot fault E&L Insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Very interesting thread. We had our cat of 15 insured with more than, paying over some years at £18.99 pcm. Sadly he developed a sarcoma over his shoulder and we decided we couldn't let him suffer anymore. We put in a modest claim for his treatment prior to his demise for steroids and antibiotics and they refused as there were still 5 months premiums left to pay!Wrote furious letter comparing this to the surviving spouse being asked to pay for partner's life insurance policy after their death (we had cancelled the DD's when he died) They have got out of this by saying that it is a yearly contract which of course is in their small print but in the end they did pay out £39 of the £99 claimed when we threatened them with FOS. Its good to hear that at least one pet insurance although expensive is honourable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Miss Muppet

 

It's not that expensive, in fact it was the best quote I could find. The total is just under £16/month in total for one dog (a 4 year old German Spitz) and one cat (a moggy just under 10 years.) I havn't checked the small print but I am sure there is no minimum contract period and even if there were, I wouldn't be too unhappy. Despite the negative posts on this forum, I can't, in all honesty, fault this company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

E&L

I am disappointed with them, so far I have waited 3 months for over £1200.00 and all we get is that your claim has been processed and the account has gone to be cleared you should receive settlement soon.

 

Even the Vets do not recommend them, they have a bad name for paying up, unfortunately I was sucked in. NEVER AGAIN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's well worth checking the policy document before commiting yourself to any pet insurance. There are three different types and your quote will reflect this.

1 year fixed term will be the cheapest

Ongoing but cost capped per condition is the next level. The companies that offer this use some pretty dubious terms in my opinion to make you think this is open ended. M&S refer to 'lifelong cover' but when you read the policy you realise that any condition is cost capped.

Cover for life will be the most expensive premium because the insurers will continue to pay out for a condition for as long as necessary. Petplan do cover for life but you are paying for all the add-ons in the policy. How much extra do you want to pay for holiday cancellation cover etc?

 

A company called Petguard will do cover for life for vets fees only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I hope this helps others to get action on their claims with E&L. I put in a claim at the beginning of january 2009 for a hospitalisation for our dog in the wek leading up to Xmas 2008. The bill was for £440. I was told by the vet that there could be problems with E&L and that I would have to settle the bill myself and then claim back from the insurers. This I did, but I heard nothing at all from E&L about my claim. The insurance ran out on 3rd january and I was sent a new quote for double what I had paid previously and they took the money by direct debit. They also took a small fee for a 'bogus' national regsitration scheme which I subsequently found out belonged to E&L All this was done on the basis of 'unless you decline the offer we will assume you want it'. I sent back a letter rescinding the insurance and regsitration scheme within the 14 day cooling off period and got a telephone call from the head of customer services. I heard nothing after that so I wrote a letter to the Managing Director and Company Solicitor stating that this was 'Formal Complaint' and that I expected a reply within three working days. I got my money back with a letter from the Managing Director, but still no action on my original claim. I subsequently swamped them with numbered e-mails to every department in E&L on a weekly, then twice weekly, basis. After e-mail number 15 had gone in I got a telephone call and subsequently a cheque for the full amount from a solicitor in the Quotations Department! My advice to anyone in the same situation is to issue a Formal Complaint as soon as possibel and then to bombard all departments in the comapny through their web-site with numbered e-mails until you get a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it was a while ago, about 6 years, but I had my horse stolen from his field. E & L were fantastic, if I remember correctly they settled within 6 years. The loss adjuster who came to see me was very helpful and sympathetic.

 

I suspect maybe they have changed a little since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it was a while ago, about 6 years, but I had my horse stolen from his field. E & L were fantastic, if I remember correctly they settled within 6 years. The loss adjuster who came to see me was very helpful and sympathetic.

 

I suspect maybe they have changed a little since then.

 

They settled within 6 yrs.....6yrs???? Hope thats a typo!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I had the misfortune to work for E and L Insurance for a brief spell a few years ago. It was heartbreaking to work for them because I have a conscience and I am an animal lover.

 

I don't want to say too much (I could tell you lots but would probably get in trouble and what I am writing isn't a review really) but it was a very strange place to work for a number of reasons.

 

Just steer clear!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hightail wrote a good review on Pet Insurance here :-

 

The Consumer Forums - Pet Insurance Know what you're buying

 

From my own experience E&L are the pits :mad:

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very sorry for the people struggling with A&L especially the person whose cat died which is very upsetting - they sound horrendous!

 

I have 4 cats and was initially with Petplan. The vet used to claim direct so I didn't have to pay out initially, the vet did like them so they must have paid him on time.

 

Then I changed to Sainsburys Petcare as I got a better deal for less money and they too have been excellent. I do have to pay upfront with these (the vet only claim direct for certain providers PDSA, Petplan as there are so many insurers in the market now) and then claim it back but I get it within a week or so.

 

Pet insurance is a minefield as they all offer different levels of cover so you can't go off just the quotes on comparison sites. You have to really study the policy details. Takes ages to figure out which one is really the best for you. One I've got now even pays for special food for one of mine who has kidney problems that he is on for life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My dog had an operation on his leg at the end of June which cost over £1300, like most people these days I don't that amount of money spare and paid the vet with my credit card. I have been phoning at least once a week since then. I have been told my claim has been approved but it is now with their payments department and I'll just have to wait my turn, they will not tell me when I will get payment or put my through to anyone who will tell me. I asked for the regulators address today which they would not give me and said I had to make an official complaint to them first, which will be in the post to them tonight. I also asked what standard what set out by the regulator regarding timescales in paying out and she said they state has to be paid within a reasonable time (what is a reasonable time? and is this correct?)

 

This is the worst customer service I have ever experienced. :mad:

 

Any advise would be greatfully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that 'Heads up' Hightail.

 

It always pays to check who is underwriting your policy. Even some of the supermarkets own brand products go back to E&L

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Don’t deal with this company, the biggest rip off company I’ve ever dealt with.

When we filed a claim it took months to get back to us, when they finally got back to us the refused to pay the claim saying we had not given them all the information, the same information that we had sent to them,

THEY ARE HAPPY TO TAKE YOUR MONEY; THEY WILL NOT PAY YOU OUT WHEN REQUIRED.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

DO NOT INSURE WITH THIS COMPANY

 

We bought our horse two years ago and never jumped him. My daughter started jumping in december 2010, she had two lessons in one week and my horse has been lame since. After doing the usual box rest etc... we called our vet. After x-rays and ultrasounds it turns out he has torn ligaments. - we knew nothing of this if we did on purchase we probably wouldn't have bought him to do WHP - Well what can say about EandL claims department and keeping it clean, rude, unhelpful, annoying and the list goes on.

 

I am still paying my monthly fees to them and my vet bill of £3.5k. not to mention all our entries fees to PUK and NCPA and my livery bills to boot on a horse that at present following two operations is stood in a small paddock. We love our horse and wouldn't part with him.

 

The response with get from eandl when they answer e-mails or the phone is that the claim is being 'assessed' how long does it take to assess...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone. I gave up using this company for cat insurance a while back. They were dreadful. I specifically remember when I was trying to resolve our problem that when I lost patience and asked to speak to a superior they refused. When I really lost it and asked to speak to the MD, they told me they were a 'no names' company and would not put me through or tell me the name of the head honcho.

 

I agree, don't use them, sounds as if they haven't improved.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If you look up my past comments on this despicable company you will see it is an ongoing problem. How E & L are still in business, I don't know.

We packed up our insurance & a year after losing our beloved Rocky, lost Misty, our eldest & dearest girl Aged 21 a year later.

Had we kept the insurance I dare say we would..eventually have got something. But, though it might seem like I cut off my nose to spite my face, at the time , after all we went through with Rocky, it was more unbearable to go on with that company than not to.

We paid for her loss, literally, in her cremation etc and painful as it was, we at least did not have to go over & over the circumstances on the phone with some cold voice who questioned our every claim.

 

When you lose a pet which has been part of your family you do not expect to be quizzed over every detail of your claim.

When we lost Misty, just as with Rocky, it wasn't about cash, it wasn't about what we could claim because nothing can replace a loved pet which has been a part of your life for so many years.

But having paid out you do expect some help, not return, its not an investment, but to expect help with bills is not unreasonable when that is what you pay for.

We wish we hadn't bothered with pet insurance now because the fight just added to the pain of our loss.

It's different for those with larger animals, horses etc.

But our dear friend at Cats Protection says she never has insurance for her cats (we got another cat from her after we lost Misty because our remaining cat, Shandy was so lonely). She believes they are all bad value & I am inclined to agree with her.

You think you are doing the best thing, but if you pay the same amount into an account for pets as you would to insurance............

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, we didn't take it any further than complaining to E & L, for all the good it did. It was just such a heart breaking time and we were upset & angry and just wanted nothing more to do with them. Then, as I said, we lost Misty a year later, but at least we didn't have to repeatedly go over every painful detail to some unfeeling moron at the end of a phone.

Yes we had the same luck as you when trying to speak to someone in authority at E & L.

I can understand being quizzed over a contents insurance claim or such like. But do E&L really think people insure their animals in the hope of making a fast buck? It says a lot about them that most vets seem to be aware of their reputation, some refusing to deal with them. Though our vet was very good & dealt with & spoke to E & L when they were querying claims for Rocky, despite E&L virtually accusing the vet of lying!

Some sort of petition is needed I think, to then be presented to someone who can fully investigate their methods.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My local vets has now put up a big bold notice in its window and on the door of its examination room saying people with E&L have to pay in full straightaway as they never pay out, and strongly recommending that customers do not use this company. What a glowing reference!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats another nail in the coffin of E & L, or it should be. Wouldn't you think the Vetinary profession would be able to do something to add to consumers gripes about this despicable company? It's obviously still happening. Hopefully at least people are made aware by notices like those at vetinary surgeries & by sites like this before they buy pet insurance...but I would guess most have already commited before anything like this comes to light.

Most people are already caught up in the web of E & L & have probably paid, as we had, insurance for many years when they come up against them.

I think it's cruel. E & L question every detail & get many things wrong. (As they did with our claim for Rocky when they 'quoted' a claim for 'toys' & it was heart breaking to have to explain, over & again, that there was no claim for 'toys' our cat had to be put to sleep, our claim had been for that & his treatment for ''Teeth". Our first (and only) claim, Rocky was 17 & had been insured since a kitten. )

So do E&L think people who insure their pets are in it for the money?!!

Of all the possible insurance scams that happen, do they really believe someone is going to insure their pet, pay for almost 20 years & claim a fraction of the payments back?

We had 3 cats insured initially, lost one to a road accident & didn't even bother to claim, we were too upset & we would have had to take his dead body to the vets to verify. Then we lost Rocky. Then Misty, our oldest cat, first insured, but after the fiasco with Rocky we'd cancelled the insurance, wanting nothing more to do with E & L. We lost her the year after Rocky.

 

It is understandable that short term insurance claims should be investigated. But when a claim is made, for a fraction of the overall cost over the years of payment, the least you can expect is for them to get the facts right & not to queery a couple of hundred when a few thousand has been paid out, over years, for such emergencies.

What will it take to put them out of business?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

When our little Rag |Doll kitten Arthur was taken ill, hospitalised and died we incurred a very heavy bill - £3500+. Only at the point of having to claim did I look up reviews of E&L/Pet-Insurance and I was deeply worried to hear of the bad experiences of others, and therefore what might lie ahead for me.

Being a Citizens Advice Bureau Advisor I therefore used advice which we give others, namely keep a phone log with dates, times & names and a record of all correspondence.

I am very pleased to report that my experience of E&L's processes and Customer Service has been first rate and although inevitably there is a bit of a delay on cheques of this size I was paid out just after Christmas when Arthur died on 15th November. All the staff I interfaced with were very customer-friendly and efficient, and they were supported by very good IT systems which allowed them to instantly update me on the stages of my claim.

In all, a very efficient experience. I now have our other cat and new dog with E&L and have recommended them to others. E&L did tell me they had only recently increased their staffing to respond to the type of issues raised in the various blogs, but Vet's do still seem to promote other Co's rather than them - so, work to do there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...