Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Multiple listings with Experian....help!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a loan with EGG. The loan and PPI were mis-sold. On my credit report with experian, EGG have listed 3 loans all starting on the same day in 2003. The one i signed the loan agreement for is listed as settled.

Another starts and stops the same day, with different loan amount, payments and term. The third is for £5 a month for 147 months.

The question is:-

If EGG have listed the original loan as settled and do not have agreements for the other 2 loans, can they enforce them??

They say that all 3 are the same agreement. Can they register the information like this with experian?

Can I use this to my advantage and ask for the money back for the loan they say is settled if they cannot provide a CCA for it?

Any idea's how to use this mess to help me fight them??

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you only signed for one loan then you should only have one agreement. Trouble is sometimes they set the ppi on a separate agreement. Is the ppi settled too? If all are settled then no problem eh! What do you want to fight them for? Mis-selling?

If so you may well have a case with the ppi but as for the loan if you applied for it and spent it, whats the mis-sell there?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took out the loan and PPI on the advice of the EGG representative over the phone. They promised the PPI would cover me even though I was already off work ill....

The sales person gave an example, that should my diagnosis change EGG would pay the loan until I am well enough to return to work....

I had been diagnosed as having a blood infection from a holiday. I was then re-diagnosed with cluster headaches, SUNA headaches and another type....a few months later!

When I tried to claim they used pre-existing condition to refuse to pay!

I complained, EGG put the payments I had already paid back into my bank. They sent me a letter saying , gesture of goodwill.

I complained again, that If they hadn't have lied to me when they sold the PPI and Loan......I would never have taken the loan in the first place!

I used the loan to pay my EGG credit card off and my overdraft!

I have a copy of the whole conversation on CD, that EGG sent me...

You can even hear the girl lying.....

I paid the full amount for over 1 year, getting deeper and deeper into debt. Eventually I couldn't pay, so I made an offer through CCCS.

They accepted, then got Moorcroft chasing and threatening me.....

I want to pay what I owe them, But they are being so Viscious!

Now I find that they have registered 3 loans on the day I took 1 out!

1 still active and 2 settled....

I only signed 1 contract, so how can they get experian to list 3 seperate loans??

If they all refer to the same loan, then why not amend one, not create 3???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok this isnt a complicated as it first appears. Without actually seeing the paperwork I am only guessing of course.

 

What it looks like is that the loan and PPI have been recorded on the CRA as seperate agreements, I have no idea why they should do that. My guess is the third loan is the original credit card debt.

 

The credit card has of course been settled now and so has the PPI after you complained.

 

Have you done a sec 77/78 request for copies of the agreements yet or an SAR ?

 

The first thing to do is an SAR and get all the data back which should help unravel this. I would then do a sec 77/78 request after copies of the agreements and make sure firstly that they actually exist and secondly that the agreements tally with the sar and CRA records.

 

I would also write to moorcroft telling them nicely to keep their noses out of it as the entire matter is now in dispute. I tend to ignore a DCA as I am usually up to my neck pushing the original creditor against a brick wall ;)

 

Until you get the data and agreements back its not going to be easy working out why they have recorded things in the manner they have.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks tamadus...

The only CCA they say that they can supply is the original for the loan that is settled on experian.

The other 2 listed with experian, EGG say they are all the same loan!

But they have listed it 3 times with different amounts and terms. But they haven't discussed any changes with me. They just altered the details and did what they wanted. If they have listed the original loan agreement as settled, surely that means the agreement is now ended and they can't just start another one??

I just got a copy of an agreement from moorcroft today, but still waiting for EGG to send the original. The one sent has signature on 1 page and date, but amount and length of loan on the other page. I thought the CCA agreements had to have all the detail and signature on the one agreement?

The 2 seperate pieces of paper have nothing on them tying them together. They even have different dates on them!

As well as experian list the start date as 28th October 2003, but the agreement wasn't even signed by me until 4th November 2003, according to what they sent me!

It all looks a bit dodgey as the agreement number is different to the loan number....??

Moorcroft didn't send the deed of assignment either!

If the agreement comes from moorcroft and not EGG, is that still deemed as supplied to me under my request??

It wasn't even sent recorded delivery, so how they expect to prove they supplied it, I don't know!

lol......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest strangewayofsavin

Firstly phone Egg and tell them they are duplicate, tell them you want the duplicates removed as the duplicates are a defemation of your character, as the duplicates will count a 3 instead of 1, if they tell you to phone the Registry trust, tell them they will have to fax registry trust as they have entered the info, if they refuse Pm me and I will give you guidance of how to file a defemation of character charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...