Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Bank not supplying me with my statements HELP


A. Tinker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent the standard 1st letter to Barclays Bank on 01/3/07 asking for copy statements within 40 days. That was sent on 01/03/07, the 40 days was up on 09/04/07. I received on 12/03/07 a letter from Andrew Miskell saying:

 

"We refer to your letters of 1 March, which were passed to this department as we deal with request for information under the terms of the data protection act.

We will be sending you copy bank statements for the period requested in the next few weeks (without charge). Please be aware that starement information prior to 2000 is stored manually rather than on computer. Therefore, if your account was opened prior to this time, there may be an increase in the time required to collate the information you have requested. I apologise in advance should this delay be the cause of any inconvenience to you. Nevertheless we will supply you with the statements as requested within the statutory 40 day time period.

We do not maintain a list of charges on each customer's account. However, the charges information you have requested can be obtained from the copy statements.

As regards your mention of "manual intervention", the Act does not oblige the Bank to comment about internal policies and procedures. Furthermore, in the context of managing day to day transactions arising from out of order accounts, the Bank does not hold the information have requested in a form that woul dbe covered by the Act. Whilst aggregated information is retained for statisical purposes, this would not constitute "personal data" under the Act and therefore would not be covered by a request under s.7 of the Act.

As the Bank is providing the copy statements on a complimentary basis your payment is retruned herewith.

Andrew Miskell

Privacy & Barclays Data Protection"

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

I have a main account and account number 2, my main account was opened years and years ago. Account number 2 has been open for about 18 months. Hence the referring to 2 accounts.

 

PLEASE can someone advise me what to do now, I have seen on other threads that suggest sending a letter basically asking for the statements and threating court action but I would have to be prepared to go ahead with the court action which at this point I'm really not to sure about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to working 2 jobs and not getting much time at home I have decided to pass this to a company to fight with Barclay's on my behalf, I still have not got my statements despite sending the 1st request letter on 01/03/07. I have seen companies advertised that do not charge to reclaim bank charges on your behalf. Can anyone offer any advice on these companies, are they trustworthy? And can anyone recommend a company they have used. All replies greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will take as much as 60% of your winnings.

 

Is it really worth it.

why not get someone from on here that is local to you to handle it for you.

 

cmon this is your money dont give it to a bloodsucking company.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe you would consider giving this to a company to handle for you. I work really hard, I am a single parent and work full time, and I have managed it.

I have to admit, it is through the help from everyone on this site, they will take you through every stage, they will even give you templates of letters, so you just have to fill in your details, that is it. I admit it gets harder once you get to the court stage but it is something with everyones support on here i am sure you can do, why give money away.

Good luck, take a long hard think about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know a couple of people who have decided to use companies, and are already regretting it. My Brother is using one which he found in an email from smartfreestuff saying reclaim within 6 weeks, so he printed off the forms giving his consent and sent them off. A few weeks later he was asked to send £10.00 for the S.A.R which he did, even though i told him to do it himself or i'd do it for him. Well its now been 3 months and apart from the email/letter requesting £10.00 he has not heard anything. No copy statements, no copy of letters sent or received, not a peep.

 

This concerns me a lot as not only do they charge him 25% of the claim, but how would he ever know how much the claim was for? was any interest claimed? Will the money be paid to him? If not will he even see any of the money.

 

Anyone can open a Trading as Account so are these businesses even genuine to start with.

 

I would strongly recommend not using any so called company to claim for you when all they do is send exactly the same letters found on this site for free. I have also recommended my brother write to his bank withdrawing his consent for them to share his information with this "company" and also to Email/Write to this company to withdraw his consent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He could withdraw his custom under the grounds that he has heard nothing since instructing them to forward the SAR and as DPA states the 40 day deadline has well and truly passed, they are clearly not acting in his best interests.

Not only that, they should return the £10 for the requests if he banks with one of the ones that we know do not charge for the release of copy statments.

 

These people could be just like you and me, sat at home doing it form this site, how would you know, charging a fee for doing something that doesnt cost anything

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...