Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
    • I emailed both. Tarry's came back "Please note that I have now left the business. Please contact Matthew Barnes ([email protected])  going forward" so will send to him.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Horwood Vs Littlewoods Visa Card ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6068 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my third venture on getting charges back (others still pending). I just sent the £10 cheque off for my statements. Lets hope they don't make a fuss

 

Heather x

 

PS Littlewoods Visa is run by barclays so i didn't know which board to put this on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sorry for the late reply Moving on... I couldn't remember the address I sent it to, and coz of my computer crashing I've lost a lot of letters and addresses.

 

anyways.....

 

I recieved my statements today, and they owe me over £200. I know it's not a lot, but it's enough for a single mum like me :)

 

what is the link for me to work out my charges for a littlewoods card? is it any different to the one on the site?

 

Cheers as always

Heather :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, this morning I recieved a fob off letter from LPF saying that they disagree with the charges being unfair lol. But have offered me the difference back from the £20 they used to charge and the £12 they charge now. Thats £8 back per charge giving me a total of £96!

 

Will I'm not going to accept that, so off I go to the next stage!

 

This was a reply to the first letter i sent them, using the credit card template on this site, do i send them another letter giving them another 14 days to ponder over my rejection, or do i just wait out another week and start court proceedings?

 

Advice always welcome

Cheers

Heather

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just used the rejecting letter template, hopefully I have amended it well enough to work for a credit card company. I've accepted their part payment as I'm trying to clear the balance on the card quickly as possible, but have stated that I will still be going for the full amount in a count court.

 

Fingers crossed this will work, egg got to this stage and gave up to pay in full, hopefully these will do the same!

 

Heather x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heather

 

At the end of 14 days from your original letter claiming charges back you should send a letter before action (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html)

 

THat gives them 14 days to reply positively or you will start court action without any further notice. Let us know what happens so we can help you through the next stage(s).

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm preparing to do my N1 form, I know you have a copy of what to write for Banks, but is it the same for credit cards? Also who do I address as the defendent.

 

I have a Littlewoods Card which is done by Littlewoods Personal Finance, which is a trading name for Solution Personal Finance Limited. The stated creditor is Barclays Bank PLC.

 

Now who am I taking to court out of all these? I don't want to make a mistake and have to pay £35 to amend it!

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm preparing to do my N1 form, I know you have a copy of what to write for Banks, but is it the same for credit cards? Also who do I address as the defendent.

 

I have a Littlewoods Card which is done by Littlewoods Personal Finance, which is a trading name for Solution Personal Finance Limited. The stated creditor is Barclays Bank PLC.

 

Now who am I taking to court out of all these? I don't want to make a mistake and have to pay £35 to amend it!

 

Cheers

 

Heather

 

What you put on the N1 is essentially the same as for banks. I will post what I put on my credit card claim in another post.

 

I think you are taking Solution to court. As the defendant you should put "Solution Personal Finance Limited trading as Littlewoods Personal Finance". You will also need the address, which is

 

SOLUTION PERSONAL FINANCE LIMITED

AINTREE INNOVATION CENTRE, PARK

LANE, NETHERTON

BOOTLE

L30 1SL

 

They are linked to Barclays but I am sure that is not relevant. Companies are independent entities and the fact that one might be owned by or related to another is irrelevant.

 

Steven

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the Particulars of claim we used suitabley amended:

 

IN THE TOYTOWN COUNTY COURT

 

BETWEEN

 

scussiemoo, CLAIMANT

 

AND

 

SOLUTION PERSONAL FINANCE LIMITED trading as LITTLEWOODS PERSONAL FINANCE, DEFENDANT

 

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

1. The Claimant had an account number xxxxxxxxx, ("the Account") with the Defendant which was opened on or around date.

 

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant has automatically debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. A list of the charges (“the Schedule”) applied is attached to these Particulars of Claim.

 

4. The Claimant contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account were punitive in nature; were not genuine pre-estimates of costs incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and were not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enriched the Defendant which exercised the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of

 

i) the Unfair Terms In Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 particularly but not limited to Regulations 5, 6 and 8 and Schedule 2, 1 e); and

 

ii) the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, particularly but not limited to sections 3 and 11 and Schedule 2 and

 

iii) the common law relating to liquidated damages and penalties in contracts.

 

5. To the extent that it is found that the Defendant’s charges were for the provision of credit services the Claimant contends that the price thereof is unreasonable pursuant to section 15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

6. The defendant had, in addition, levied interest on these charges at the rate of 29.9%.

 

7. The Claimant avers that, by this action, the Defendant has sought to enrich itself by the consequences of unlawful action, specifically, unlawful penalty charges as detailed above and applied in terrorem.

 

9. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

 

a) the return of £xxxx (write amount ion words) debited to the Claimants account plus yyy (write amount ion words) debited to the Claimant’s account in respect of interest on charges detailed in the attached schedule, in the sum of £zzz (TOTAL - write amount ion words);

 

b) Court costs;

 

c) Interest under section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per year from date of claim and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.022%.

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true

 

 

Steven

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

.... and brief particulars of claim

 

Repayment of interest on amounts charged by the defendant and debited to an account with the claimant for purported breaches of a contract to supply credit services. The claimant avers that these charges and the interest thereon were levied against him in contravention of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

The Claimant claims:

 

a) the return of £xxxx (write amount ion words) debited to the Claimants account plus yyy (write amount ion words) debited to the Claimant’s account in respect of interest on charges detailed in the attached schedule, in the sum of £zzz (TOTAL - write amount ion words);

 

b) Court costs;

 

c) Interest under section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per year from date of claim and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.022%.

 

 

THese go on page 1. ON page 2 under particulars of claim write "attached" and attach the above on a seperate sheet.

 

Steven

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the N1 form info, in the last letter I sent them I gave them the 14days notice, and that has now passed. I'm going to be nice and give them grace til monday (mainly because i think I'm actually getting somewhere with negotiations). I'll write out the N1 Form anyways, and post it as soon as I know whats in the post on monday.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of interest. It says on my monthly statement. "Purchase Annual Rate - 37.9%" and also "Cash Annual Rate - 37.9%" Can i really try to get back interest at the same rate of 37.9%? or do i stick to the banks usual 8%?

 

please let me know soon as poss.

Heather x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of interest. It says on my monthly statement. "Purchase Annual Rate - 37.9%" and also "Cash Annual Rate - 37.9%" Can i really try to get back interest at the same rate of 37.9%? or do i stick to the banks usual 8%?

 

please let me know soon as poss.

Heather x

 

Heather

 

If they charged you 37.9% then that's what I would go for. We have just won against GE Money at 29.9% (which is what they charged us)

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol sounds good to me. any ideas what the calculations are for working out the interest for 37.9%?

 

Cheers as always

 

Use one of the spreadsheets in the templates section or Mindzai's (http://www.zen122856.zen.co.uk/CompoundSheet_v1.9.xls)

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to be awkward, looking through the particulars of the claim, its still got on there the bit about Section 69 and claiming 8%. now if I'm claiming the 37.9% that the company charges me, do I keep this in and amend it? or do I take it out completely?

 

Cheers

 

I was sent a goodwill payment of £96, and I told littlewoods that I'll still be going for the rest. Do I add in the N1 form that I've recieved this goodwill payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create your schedule with the 37.9% interest - that is then your claim. Under the Couty Court Act 1984 s69 you are entitled to 8% interest on your claim up until the time of judgement or earlier settling of the claim. In other words you add the 8% on top of the 37.9% effectively.

 

So inyour PoC and brief PoC you say something like

 

a) the return of £xxxx debited in respect of charges plus £yyy interest charged thereon;

b) court costs

c) interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per year (0.022% /day).....

 

Note: some have claimed contractual interest (in your case at 37.9%) up until the timeof judgement. In that case you obvviously can't claim 8% as well.

 

Steven

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't got my N1 in yet, as the letter proving my exemption from fees was 4 days out of date, so need to wait for another letter confirming benefits before I can pursue any further with that.

 

This morning I received this letter.

 

Dear Miss

 

I refer to your letter dated 24th May 2007.

 

I note that you are dissatisfied with our offer to refund £96.00. However our position remains that we believe it is fair when customers' break the terms of their agreement with us, we recover the costs. Therefore, I am not prepared to consider your request for any further refund.

 

As previously advised, when your barcleycard account was opened, you signed and agreed to our Terms and conditions and this includes details of our charges. The information provided at application stage clearly explains our obligation to our customers, as well as their obligation to us. If we make any changes to the Terms and Conditions we provide details of these to our customers.

 

I appreciate that this may not be the outcome you expected, however I trust that the information I have provided has clarified Barclaycard's position.

 

Should you have any further questions regarding this matter please do not hesistate to contact me, If my reply does not meet with your expectations you may ultimately be eligible to refer to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Further details of this service are available on request. If I have not heard from you within 8 weeks, from the date of this letter, I will close my complaint file in accordance with our usual practice.

 

Yours Sincerely

Bev Brady

Customer Services

 

 

Right, so now what? do I just file my N1 and then see their reaction, or something completely different?

 

Cheers

Heather

Link to post
Share on other sites

lLooks like a standard fob of letter. Ignore it and go on wit your claim as they have not given you a satisfactory answer in your timescale

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

grr, I've just made a silly mistake :(

 

I noticed when going through my statements, that I used to have an introductory interest rate of 12.9. and when I did my figured I did 37.9% for the whole charges claim. I've already sent in my N1, am I going to have to amend it?

 

Heather

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could just write and tell them you made a mistake see http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-912852.html and the next few posts

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Grr! damn royal mail, they lost my form! Got to send in the N1 form again. which to be honest, I'm quite happy about, because I don't want to claim CI anymore, seems like to much hassel to get the numbers right.

 

Hev

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right after having to get more evidence for the fee exemption form, I finally got my forms in to the court in person yesterday. I've been told they'll be issued today, so it'll be interesting to see what Solutions Finance do now... eek!

 

Heather x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heather

 

Don't worry, we're right behind you. Keep us posted (I know you will!)

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yep I will keep you informed. Littlewoods have until 4pm today to put in a defense, I rang this morning, and as for yet they haven't put in a defense. So fingers crossed. I'm going to ring monday morning, and if they haven't put in a defense, I'll send in for a judgement.

 

wish me luck (again lol)

Heather

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...