Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Newman & Non Compliance of CITI debt CCA request


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4305 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I agree flyguy and the OFT have my agreement to further the complaint. On the "Rameses" matter, did he take his pseudonym from the egyptian king? He was a Pharaoh who's principles were to get people to sacrifice their goals & dreams to help towards acheiving his goals, dreams, wealth etc then the richer his life will be! Must be working for a dca!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

On the "Rameses" matter, did he take his pseudonym from the egyptian king? He was a Pharaoh who's principles were to get people to sacrifice their goals & dreams to help towards acheiving his goals, dreams, wealth etc then the richer his life will be! Must be working for a dca!!!!

 

One assumes so, corruption and immorality were rife in his time - interestingly he only led a short life, and was far from succesful as Pharoah.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rameses vbmenu_register("postmenu_776694", true);

Basic Account Customer

 

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 64

reputation_pos.gif

 

 

icon1.gif Re: A View From The Inside - The Whitleblower Thread

I thought it would be a good idea for anyone who currently or has previously had dealings with a debtor to have a space to help anyone else out. I know that there are some here who are debtors, or at least were. Here is your opportunity to right your wrongs and provide any hints, tips or general information. If you still are a debtor do not identify yourself and be careful to cover your tracks.

 

Legality

Debtors have a horrendous sense of self-importance, a superiority complex, and consider themselves very knowledgeable about debt. What they often fail to distinguish is that their knowledge is from forum postings written by those without true knowledge of the law. They are not solicitors. Their knowledge is frequently minimal.

 

Phone Calls

Debtors are nothing more than borrowers. Their own income rests on how much money they can borrow without paying it back. Ignorance of the law and the inability to take any notice of what they agreed and signed to means many will knowingly pressure creditors and DCA's into allowing them to pay whatever they are offered. The general consensus among debtors is that those in debt collection are stupid, and unintelligent. Ironically, in reality it is usually the debtor who is the less intelligent one; I was unfortunate enough to work with some utter moronic debtors who often just go from creditor to another bullying their way through phone calls. They rarely express an ounce of guilt or demonstrate any sort of conscience - on the contrary, the nastier they are, the greater the boast to their fellow debtors. A debtor on the phone rarely has the authority to insist you agree anything. The worst they can do is send it to their 3rd party representative which simply results in the same kind of payment refusal but with 'CAB' written at the top.

 

The solution to dealing with debtors is to sue them. Do not speak to them on the phone, and do not respond to any of their generic letters. Write to them and tell them what you are going to do and let that be that. If possible, correspond directly with the original debtor. Accounts with CAB's go through a 'cycle', meaning that they have accounts for months without replying and if they've been unsuccessful in making an arrangement they return the account to the original debtor who then passes it onto another CAB and the whole sorry process begins again.

 

I know a lot of that is going to be known already by a lot of you but I hope it helps regardless and encourages anybody else dealing with these debtors to speak out.

 

 

****************************************************

 

 

 

He seemed to take Danny's Whistleblower post to heart with this response. Maybe it touched a raw nerve??? :D :D He hasn't been on for a couple of days, maybe he's busy with some pyramid schemes! :razz: :razz:

What sort of world do you want your kids to grow up in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one! It does seem his time on this forum is as short lived as his namesake. Could be like arnie though.... I'll be back! Could even run for parliament????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting reflecting on his posts, they are all in a similar vein although in some he seems to acknowledge that some people need help. There I agree with him, debtors do need help, not threats or harrasment. The help offered is of course "if you owe it - pay it" Implication all the underhand and immoral behaviour by DCA's is ok, 'cos those evil debtors deserve it!

 

Not a lot of use to those who find themselves in financial difficulty. Well help is available on this site - if it means using legal process to make life difficult for the DCA's - tough, its simply playing them at their own game.

 

Of course this is not ideal, in an ideal world financial institutions would take a more responsible attitude - credit is positively pushed upon people - usually those least able to afford it often at extortionate interest rates- if banks and credit companies end up with debtors they have themselves to blame, after all they are not exactly poor companies, they make a lot of money out of debt - arguably most of their profits, so I have little sympathy for them.

 

People borrow because of force of circumstance, sometimes out of need, sometimes out of desire - i doubt many borrow in the belief that they dont have to pay it back. Sadly once in debt it is all to easy for those debts to increase rapidly (high interest rates, penalty charges, over limit fees etc) - it spirals quickly and given the stigma attached becomes difficult to deal with.

 

Resolution is the key and will only come when the 'lenders' accept their responsibilities and obligations, and work with the person in debt - letters demanding payment with menaces only serve to exacerbate the problem. DCA's actually serve no useful purpose, except to make their principals rich out of exploiting others misery.

 

Lending is a risk business - not actually that risky when tax breaks exist to write off bad debt and sell the debt to a DCA. DCA's also take a risk by buying debts that are not easy to recover, they seem to do pretty well out of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Did you ever get the copy of the executed agreement?

 

There seems to be a definate issue with Citi Financial Europe Plc not complying with such requests?

 

That said the Office Of Fair Trading who would be the organisation you would want to complain to seem reluctant to do anything, that said Citi's credit license is due for renewal this September, but I wont hold my breath.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

LOL I just picked up on this thread! ...

CitiFinancial must be one of the worst financial services companies in the UK! APR's to commit suicide over too. Anyhow I have a dispute with them and right so as it was earlier the FOS Referred me to the FLA. This organisation is a pure joke and 100% funded AFAIK by their own members.

It's taken me many, many months and they are totally biased to the complainant (in this case moi!).

Today I received an astounding letter telling me ... what I already knew! Their supposed representative in previous phone calls starts to do the 'T&C' issue to try and avail herself of proceeding further. Finally after some type of 'battle of wits' fight she said she would get all the data. In the end what did the FLA do - erm, absolutely nothing at all. Somthing like copying what CF said to them and back to square one. I guess I'll have to spend the tenner to do the SAR and back we go again.

So be warned CF & their (jokingly) representing body, the FLA have proved to be as much use as chocolate teapots. Kind of a layman's ideal of back street loan sharks and their minders. LOL

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I'm about to send my statute barred letter off to Cabot for a citi card debt. Before I do, I'd just like clarification that the alleged debt is under scots law. I live in Scotland but citi are at an English address...... so, the question is, 5 or 6 years??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...