Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Card transactions after card has expired


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

Can anyone tell me where I stand regarding the bank continuing to pay companies even though the debit card has expired? The original payment method was set up on line using a debit card

The bank say that it is up to me to cancel via the company who are claiming the money, but I would argue that if I tried to use the card elsewhere, it would be declined.

Any ideas?

Thank you

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted the companies involved who have given me a goodwill payment but not a full refund. They say that the bank are at fault, and that I should claim from them.

The joke is that the bank had asked me to cut up the card and then return it to them, which I had done, and it had expired. The bank of course have been making money in the form of overdraft interest (I am currently claiming it back).

I had written to the bank, had face to face meetings requesting that they stop the payments.

They did not.

I have complained twice in writing to customer relations at the bank, but just would like to know where i stand!!!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest tlusnoc

Recurring transactions using a credit/debit card can only be stopped by the company who set it up and not the bank. Never ever set up one of these. They do not come under the direct debit guarantee scheme, so if the retailer or company you set it up with want to keep taking payments, there is nothing to stop them. I know people knock Direct Debits, however they really are a safe way of dealing with regular transactions. Not sure what the position is now the card has expired though. Best bet would be to contact whichever scheme operates your card Visa/Switch and put in a formal complaint, saying that you have notified the companies to cancel and that they are continuing to take payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TY Tlusnoc,

I will NEVER EVER set up this sort of payment again!

I have written to the bank's complaints dept again about use of the card once expired - i couldnt have paid for anything in a shop with the card after all!!

The companies involved have given a token goodwill payment return, but I am still cross with the bank, although maybe there is something which I am unaware of that allows the card to continue to be debited. Doesnt really make logical sense though to me?!

Cheers Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even with Lloyds own time frames involving complaints, I am 14 days away from being able to contact the FSO about this one. I advised the manager dealing with the complaint that they have two weeks or I will escalate my complaint further.

When my hubby was complaining about something else to the FSO he mentioned this situation in passing and they seemed very interested! But as to whether i have another case or not, I will have to wait and see!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only thing i know is that the cc/dc issuing company will honour any regular payments but not one offs as now the verification number is needed for one offs but not monthly payments.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank u ida5921, these were of course regular payments that were made, and i can understand the one off / verification number. Still a tricky situation from the other threads which i can see these types of continuous authority transactions are hard to rectify!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi reduk054,

 

I had a gym in london who kept taking payments from my card after i left. they said I was in a contract. I reported my card lost and the payments stopped.

 

Might have been a co incidence, who knows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi reduk, just come across your thread - we have exactly the same problem with LTSB allowing an expired debit card to be used to pay greenflag (which strangely used to belong to LTSB). These payments went through when all other dds on my husband's account had been stopped and basically destroyed what remaining creditworthiness he had. As we are now claiming the charges back I hadn't really paid much attention to what we consider to be fraudulent use of the card (as you say above red if we had tried to use the card ourselves we would have been in trouble). We have written them more than one letter (lol) accusing them of fraudulent use of the card but they have never responded. Would be very interested to know if anyone has further insight into this.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask the bank where the money is going to.

 

Then ask the company's if they were told the card had been stopped.

 

You need to no what sort of transaction they were.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, everyone, sorry for the late reply, things were getting a bit stressy here so I took a little time out, and now the sleeves are up.

The final part of this story was that the companies who were being paid by the continuous authority (a-hem!) both refunded a lump sum as a gesture of goodwill, and also the bank's service recorvery team offered a lump sum as a final settlement. To be honest, we are in a difficult situaiton and accepted the payments, although have not received the cheque from the bank yet. We had a final letter regarding our complaint, so if we had wanted to take it further we could have done, but have chosen not to.

Seabro, sounds like you sorted your problem, and take it that there were no further repurcussions from the gym. These "authorisations" are a nightmare, and I have changed my payment method to standing orders, or bank transfers through internet banking so that i am in control. I would argue with the bank though! You may get a goodwill repayment?!

Gold lady, where did you send your letters to? I may be able to give you an address where you may get a reply! ;) Good luck with your charges claim!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...