Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

FOS advice please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, i refer you to my RBS thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/43332-daver1975-rbs.html

 

I've been away for a while, stalled my claim just before doing a Summary claim for £1,410 odd. (i had to recalculate my claim, so please ignore other figures in my thread).

 

I got this reply the other day from "Bigmac versus":

 

Hi there daver1975, been a while eh, you would be wise to read up on scottish forum as it is now advisable to pursue over 750 through the FOS.

To do this you need to have the banks final say on your complaint or let the 8 weeks go by before starting, that time has obviously elapsed so start by downloading the form and send it away, bonus of this is you need not pay, only the banks do (400 quid per complaint) and remember to request the judicial interest before sending.

 

I'm overall pretty confused. I've obviously missed a turn of events in the way we battle the banks in Scotland. I realise that FOS is the Financial Ombudsman, but I've so far never read about pursuing the claim through them rather than court.

 

I've been rooting around here for answers, but I haven't found a whole lot yet. Is there anyone here who has went through this procedure? got any tips or a thread you can point me to?

 

A thousand thanks from daver.x

rbs :£1,525

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

received statements 24th oct 2006

sent prelim letter 7th nov 2006

received polite "naw" from T. McLean 14th nov 2006

l.b.a. sent off 20th november

received letter 2nd Dec, another polite refusal

Tommy McLean advises by email to take court action

 

first direct : £?

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

pending statements......

discovered that they have sent no statements from an account that doesn't exist....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

See you're needing a bit of help going down the FOS route. I'm in exactly the same situation and got some help from Maryhillgull. Hope this helps. I've got my thread as Claiming against A&L in Scotland.

 

Cheers

Deneedenee

 

 

 

here is a link to the word document that you have to send to F.O.S. http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.u...laint_form.doc

 

I would fill in the complaint bit using wording from the Prelim. I would then ask about interest in the 'other details' section.

 

THE FOS are well aware of the problem and they just write a letter to thier contact in whatever bank and say we have had a formal complaint from deneedenee asking for £xxx.xx refund of charges, what are you going to do? The bank then wait the maximum time allowed to respond and send a letter back saying o.k then we'll refund them on this occasion but only to avoid a formal F.O.S. investigation (which they have to pay for). F.O.S. then write to you and say the bank going to refund you £xx.xx is this o.k you say yes!!!!! They then write back to the bank and tell them they have x amount of time to make the refund. This is why it probably takes 12 or more weeks for you to get your money.

 

There is a large section in the FOS website about bank charges, but it does not say anything about interest as far as I could see, but there is no harm in trying.

 

Cheers Maryhilgull

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, i'll be looking into this later. I wonder that because I originally wrote to them and got a final "NO" last year, it may take a bit less time for me?

 

cheers,

 

daverx

rbs :£1,525

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

received statements 24th oct 2006

sent prelim letter 7th nov 2006

received polite "naw" from T. McLean 14th nov 2006

l.b.a. sent off 20th november

received letter 2nd Dec, another polite refusal

Tommy McLean advises by email to take court action

 

first direct : £?

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

pending statements......

discovered that they have sent no statements from an account that doesn't exist....

Link to post
Share on other sites

daver,

 

You can go to FOS up to 6 months after receiving your last rejection letter from your bank. Think the timescales will still be the same though?

 

I made the mistake of doing nothing after I received a final "no" from A&L, and because it's been over 6 months I've had to start again from scratch.

 

Cheers

Deneedenee x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so my final letter from the bank says something along the lines of "we're standing firm, please feel free to pursue this in court".

 

So instead of doing that right now, I should just fill in the FOS form and wait?

 

Also, my initial calculations were based on 6 years previous rather than 5, so should I re-calculate from the same claim date, or leave it d'ye reckon?

 

cheers folks.

rbs :£1,525

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

received statements 24th oct 2006

sent prelim letter 7th nov 2006

received polite "naw" from T. McLean 14th nov 2006

l.b.a. sent off 20th november

received letter 2nd Dec, another polite refusal

Tommy McLean advises by email to take court action

 

first direct : £?

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

pending statements......

discovered that they have sent no statements from an account that doesn't exist....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh fill in the FOS form and go down that route now. I'd claim for all charges that you've had from the bank.

 

I've heard conflicting information too about claiming back interest from FOS. Some say you can, some say you can't. I'd add on the 8% anyway and give it a go.

 

deneedenee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks.

 

I think what I'm going to do is send my complaint based on my original claim, including interest. See what happens. The reason I was going to recalculate was because I was scared of it all being thrown out of court, but now looks like I might not have to do that!

 

Cheers deneedenee!

daverx

rbs :£1,525

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

received statements 24th oct 2006

sent prelim letter 7th nov 2006

received polite "naw" from T. McLean 14th nov 2006

l.b.a. sent off 20th november

received letter 2nd Dec, another polite refusal

Tommy McLean advises by email to take court action

 

first direct : £?

sent S.A.R. 13th oct 2006

pending statements......

discovered that they have sent no statements from an account that doesn't exist....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...