Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How do i proceed if there defence is struck out.


gav6280
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got an order from gloucester court saying my case would be struck out if i did not send a more detailed particulars of claim wich they are now calling a statment of case. I have been pointed to one on this forum and have modified it to suit. Im sending it tommrow.

 

Also the the judge has ordered that if dg dont send in there aq by the 25th the defence will be struck out. I think this is very likley given dg's work load.

 

So what happens then? How do i proceed if there defence is struck out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if im right you would be able to go for judgement in default?

 

Let us know how that goes cos we're with Gloucester as well. Out of curiosity what did you send them originally?

 

double post by any chance? lol

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Nope they never did file there AQ in time, i rang the court and checked. That was last Wednesday.

 

Does this mean i have won?

 

So how long do i wait to apply for judgement?

 

What form is the best one to use?

 

Is there any advice on filling it in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I already did read that link, and i have already sent them 2 letters in 2 weeks giving them a reminder that im still here.

 

This link is reffering to cases where defence is not recived.

 

I have there defence. DG failed to submitt an AQ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i'd ring the court and ask if the judge is going to issue an unless order - ...unless they file by ... their defense will be struck out.

 

 

this isn't the best case scenario - as they will go for stays and whatever and string it out - so best case scenario is that they make you an offer - to that end.... ring the court - find out how if the judge is going to order an unless order - then write to dg - there is an example of what to write in my thread - after you've filed you aq - it is in my signature. in post number 1 is the letter when they haven't filed an aq. but you have - so tweak it to your needs and situation. my suggestion is to prod them into an offer - not to press ahead with default judgment. i'm calling these nudge letters and advise one every 10 days until they offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the good news is that if it's District Judge Thomas, he's a pretty switched on cookie and appears not to have too much sympathy for time wasting from the banks

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there, the judge has just struck out hsbc defence on my claim as the where given a sanctions order to comply with meaning they had to file their already late aq and they failed to do so, i asked what next....the court handed me a judgement form and i filed judgement, they said the bank will now be given an order to pay up.....i hope this is right!!!:rolleyes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

natwest won

natwest again won

hsbc defence struck out and judgement filed..so far so good`(and long!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify - once the deadline is passed for responding to the Order, then you need to contact the Court Manger. Point out the Order states that the case WILL be struck out.

 

You can then enter a request for default judgement. In my case it was done on an N244, but you should not have to pay a fee as the CPR clearly states that a fee is not payable when applying for a default judgement.

 

Never assume that the court will do anything - they are snowed under with cases, and do need prompting to look at files.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and there we have it - carry on with the nudging -

in gav's case: it says it will be struck out if they haven't filed by the 25th - so gav - you need to find out if they have filed and if not -you need to follow alan's advice in post 11.

and also, write a letter to dg - helpful hints in post 1 of both my aq threads listed in my signature.

baronis, as alan says in post 11 - you can now file for default judgment - but i'm going to put a letter on your thread which i think you should first send to dg.

in any case - anyone else watching - just like not halting the claim until the money arrives - a second principle which we live by should be don't stop writing to dg (i think every 10 days presses home the point without being harassment) in an effort to get them to make an offer and make the whole thing go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea i phoned the court at 4pm on the 25th. This was DG's last chance. The letter clearly states - it is ordered that the defence will be struck out AQ is not filled. This was already there 2nd chance to do so.

 

So can i go ahead and file for judgment, or is it better to wait for a letter from the court just to make sure?

 

Ive totally had enough of writting to DG, i have decied from here on in it's just going to be court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't alan's advice above say - once the deadline is passed you need to ring and talk to the court manager - pointing out the defence will be thrown out - they will then send you the forms for the default judgment.

then, as i pointed out to baronis - it needs a letter to dg - as a full offer at this point is highly preferable to a judgment they can stall for ages.

so, write to dg - i've put a v ery similar letter to wht you want on their thread today - so, ring the court manager - then write to dg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have failed to comply with a Judge's Order that categorically states they must do something by a certain date OR their case WILL be struck out, then they would be heading down a very rocky road if they applied for a set-aside of any judgement obtained.

 

Indeed any application for set-aside would almost certainly be dismissed, without one of the banks senior directors personally begging the Judge's forgiveness for ignoring his Order...and bringing with him all the documentary evidence that they have so far refused to supply to any court.

 

Once the court has confirmed to you that the defence has been struck-out (which should be 4pm on the date in the Order), I would advise filing for judgement immediately. You can download the N244 from the court website.

 

The court staff have no leeway to allow any extra time - and if staff try to say otherwise then ask to speak to the court manager, and quote the wording in the Order.

 

As soon as judgement is entered the bank are then on a strict timetable - otherwise you will be able to apply for warrant. That should concentrate their minds on getting a payment out asap.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you get the fun bit with bailiffs taking stuff out of your local branch with full media coverage if you organise it, as long as George W Bush hasn’t got an in growing toenail and Pete Doherty and Kate Moss wipe the white bits off there noses that day.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks, in my case aq had to be submitted by myself and hsbc by 12th april, i submitted mine and hsbc didnt, the judge then sent out a sanctions order stating if hsbc didnt file by 26th april he would strike out their defence. i rang court on 26th, they still hadnt submitted so the court personel said i could go down and file judgement...this was at 3pm so i ran to pick my son up.jumped on a bus.shot to court..they gave me a form..cost me nothing and i filed....now im waiting! not sure what happens now but hope this helps somebody:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so today as suggested i just rang the court and spoke to a very nice lady who informed me that she personaly just reffered my case to the judge about 10 minutes ago! what a bit of luck.

 

Anyway she said it's entirly up to the judge what happens next, but expect to have something by the end of the week. She also said they are running 2 days behind due to volume of bank case's, cool.

 

Thanks all so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So today finally i was expecting it in writting that i could file for judgment instead i got a letter saying that DG had requested a stay and that it has been granted by the judge that this is now an order.

 

WTF! getting very angry with DG now. So i quickly fired off a letter to the court today.

 

 

Dear Honourable Lord Justice Judge Singleton.

 

In response to your order of 8th May, the claimant respectfully objects to the stay imposed on this case. The claimant would like the order of stay to be removed and for this case to proceed as quickly as possible.

 

Grounds for claimant objecting to the order are:

 

• The defendant has already had more than enough time to move the case forward and its is believed that the defendant is purposefully stalling this case.

 

• The defendant has had several opportunities to move this case forward; this is supported by the letters the claimant has sent to the defendant. Copies of these letters are included for your review.

 

• The claimant believes that applying a stay to this case is unfair and after the proposed stay ends on July the 1st this case would be no further forward than it is now.

 

• The claimant believes that the defendant has already settled many similar claims in a much shorter time scale.

Sincerely

 

MR. G.Wilkinson

 

 

Hope i have done the right thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...