Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Next cant find CCA - query


linz2011
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can you answer my query - i requested my signed agreement and received a letter saying they did not have it so therefore it is not enforceable through the courts but unless i am disputing i owe it then the default will remain ? not sure where to go from here?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Linz,

as far as I am aware, ( hopefully someone will confirm this for us ) but no signed agreement with that company = no debt, no debt = no default therefore if they cannot comply with the CCA request they should remove the default against you, it could also be worth reporting them to the ICO for a breach of the DPA. IMHO

Friendship costs nothing but its rewards can be priceless. Do not judge, as you will not be judged but if you can, try and assist where possible.:smile:

everyone is entitled to MY opinion!:D

I offer my comments without prejudice or liability.

If you found my advice helpful, please click the scales at the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello linz2011, did you send off the fee of £1 with your request? and the letter by recorded delivery,the CCA request does run for 12 working days from the day of receipt by the DCA its convention to allow 2 days for the post aswell.

 

If the CCA request isnt produced as you have mentioned after the 12 working days then its in default and the DCA cannot enforce the debt,it doesnt AFAIK wipe out the alleged debt just that it isnt enforcable without a true properly executed agreement (not an application form )

 

When the intial 12 working days are up then a further calendar month expires and the DCA are in breach of the CCA and are committing an offence under the 1974 CCA.

 

Have a look around the site as there is plenty of info about people who are at various stages in the debt dispute process,default notices should be removed if you complain to the CRA`s like Experian or Equifax.

 

Regards S

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you answer my query - i requested my signed agreement and received a letter saying they did not have it so therefore it is not enforceable through the courts but unless i am disputing i owe it then the default will remain ? not sure where to go from here?

 

thanks in advance

WHo is this with?

Cna yo upostthe wording of the letter you recevied, and what is it you would like to acheive from this?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi it is with Next they say they cannot provide a signed agreement has there isn't one so they cannot enforce it through the courts but unless i am disputing that I never received the goods the default will remain and the balance is still due?

 

I am at a loss as to what to write next - i would like the default removing?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently heard from Tesco Visa and Next that they do not have a Credit Agreements. Start with this

 

Re: Account number XXXX

I am in receipt of your letter of the XX XXXX 2007.

Pursuant to the Data Protection Act 1998 (S10) you are denied the authority to pass on any of my personal data.

Pursuant to the Data Protection Act 1998 I require you, with immediate effect, to ensure that all data held by you, regarding this account is removed from any and all Credit Reference Agency database.

Accordingly you have 21 days to comply and I expect to receive confirmation from you in writing as per section 10(3) of the Data Protection Act.

Yours XXly,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all I would really appreciate it if someone could word a letter for me to respond to this letter (apologies it is long but probably relevant)

 

Dear XX

I am in receipt of your letter dated 19th April 2007 and statutory notice.

The consent to process your data was not part of the contract to supply goods and services to you. Your consent was btained at the account opening state. You opened your account by internet. A further data protection notification was proviced in each copy of the Next Directory that you have received. This furher notification forms part of the T&C's of shopping and placing order with ND you accepted the T&Cs included in the data protection notification.

I have reproduced a copy for your information. We wil make searches about you at credit reference agencies who will supply us with credit information, as well as information from the Electoral Register. The agencies will record details of the serach, whether or not credit is granted. We may use credit scoring methods to assess your application and to veify your idenify. Credit searches and other information which is provided to us and/or the credit reference agencies, about you and tyhose with whom you are linked financially, may be used to ND and other companies if credit decisions are made about you or other members of your household. This information may also be used for debt tgracing and the prevention of money laundering as qwell as the management of your account, information held about you by the CRA's may already be linked to records relating to people with whom you are linked financially. For the purposes of credit searching you may be treated as financially linked and you will be assessed with reference to any "associated" records. If we enter into a credit agreement with you, we will also supply details of your agreement with use to the CRA's as wel as ongoing details of your account and how you manage it. If you do not repay on time, or in full, we will advise the CRA's who will record dtails of the debt. All this information will be seen by other organisations carrying out later serarches.

You have the right of access to your personal records held by CRA's and we will supply their names and adds upon request to the agencies and we will supply their names and adds upon request to the Data Protection Manager, ND, Desford Road, Enderby, Leicester or by email to [email protected]. The CRA's may also use the records for stat analysis about credit, insurance and fraud. We may make periodic searches of Group records and regarding credit, inclduing whether to make credit available, or to continue or extend existing credit. These searches will not be avaialble to other lenders for credit assessment purposes. We may also use your information, inclding shopping habits to open and run your credit accont including payment recovery, fraud prevention and debt tracing and our marketing. We may contact you for marketing purposes by mail, tel, email or otherwise. Some of the information you provide may be transferred outside of the European Economic Area for processing. However, strict rules regarding the confientiality and security of your information are in place to safeguard it. ND is a trading name of Next Retail Ltd and a member of Next Group Plc. NGplc will not share your info with companies out of the group for marketing purposes.

the processing of your data in the manner which your describe in your letter is not in breach of principles 2, 4 or 5 as you suggest in your letter. It is in fact in compliance with rules set by the ICO the CRA's and Trade Associations.

ND and CRA's it uses work closely with the ICO to ensure our practices comply not only with the law but with the spirit of the law. The IC is fully aware of our practices and accepts that default info will be retained and shared by the CRA's for 6 years and this has been agreed as appropriate. It is also in the interest of responsible lending that such info is retained and shared for this length of time.

Your info will therefore remain on file with ND and the CRA's until 6 years from the date of the default. The info will be seen by other lenders making enquiries as to your credit history during this time.

I can advise that Next does not hold a CCA signed by you. Under section 127 (3) of the CCA 17974 this debt is therefore unenforceablethrough the courts.

However, the debt remains and in the absence of any evidence to suggest that you did not order and/or receive the goods delivered, your account was transferred to Debt Managers Scotland to seek payment of the abalnce owed by you.

The debt has not been assigned but was being managed by Debt Managers Scotland on behalf of Next. As the debt has not be assigned an assignemnet notice has not been issued. However, I enclose a copy of the default notice that was sent to you. There is no known requirement to provide you with certified copies.

A default entry will therefore remain on your CR file , which may affect our ability to obtain credit in the future. Your credit files have been ameded to show satsfied as the debt was paid in full (this is not the case) Copy statements have been sent to you under separate cover.

 

Sorry it is long winded but i would really appreciate any help with this

 

Thanks for your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi the default was only registered in sep 06 so it has not expired? is that what you mean

 

If i got such a reply this is would be my reply

 

Dear Monkey

 

Cut the crap out, I know my stuff and if you are not able to provide a signed authorisation for retaining or sharing my info (basically fire a S10) you have 7 days to desist failing which I will issue you with proceedings to ensure that the courts force you do so.

 

Yours

 

.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can advise that Next does not hold a CCA signed by you. Under section 127 (3) of the CCA 17974 this debt is therefore unenforceable through the courts.

 

They cannot legally enforce payment from you.... :D . Also, once they are in default of the CCA request by 12 working days and one calendar month, it becomes an offence for them to try and enforce payment themselves without going through the courts.... which of course, they cannot do.

 

However, the debt remains and in the absence of any evidence to suggest that you did not order and/or receive the goods delivered, your account was transferred to Debt Managers Scotland to seek payment of the abalnce owed by you.

 

This is no concern of yours because there is no CCA... they are just trying to find something to throw at you. Bowlarks naturally ;) .

 

The debt has not been assigned but was being managed by Debt Managers Scotland on behalf of Next. As the debt has not be assigned an assignemnet notice has not been issued. However, I enclose a copy of the default notice that was sent to you.

 

As the original creditor, they did have the right to default you. However, it can be argued that without a CCA... they had no legal right to default you. It depends what you want to get out of this and how comfortable you feel about pushing them on it...

 

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recently requested my CCA from Next...I'm pretty sure they won't be able to provide a proper one and it wasn't legal etc as was u18 when account was opened....good luck linz!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...