Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How to force SAR compliance - help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6214 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

A couple of my CC companies have made no response to my SAR. The 40 days as of tomorrow are up so I will be sending off the LBA giving them another 7 days to comply.

I'm thinking though as they haven't bothered their shirt to reply within the 40 days they may choose to ignore the LBA or simply be too incompetent to respond in the timescale.

Does anyone know what the legal proceedure is for getting a court order to force compliance as it looks like I may need to go down this route.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Rory32.

 

Go into the Bank Templates Library...........Data Protection Act.........Non -Compliance, Template Letter 3. Send them that and you should get a reply.

 

Regards.

 

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, Rory32.

 

Sorry I have just noticed, I think that's the letter you have already sent them. I do not know what happens next, maybe someone else can help.

At least this has bumped up your thread.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Scott

Yes that's the letter I've just sent them, but I'm not expecting them to comply within the 7 days as I haven't even had an acknowledgement from them so far even though the original request was sent recorded so I can prove they got it.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Rory.

 

Have you tried going into the CAG Chatroom, there will be someone in there who can help.(I hope).

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Scott

Tried that but know one seems to be quite sure. I think I'll pop into the CAB later this week and see if they can offer any advise. Failing that I may just consult a lawyer and see if I can claim the expense back as part of the claim.

I will post the outcome as I'm sure there will be other people who find themselves in the same position sooner or later.

 

Rory

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have today received a letter from GE Money (just one of the many now in default) saying as requested please find a list of transactions blah, blah, blah.

I must advise however, unfortunately after extensive enquiries (yeah I bet), on our retrieval system , we experienced problems attaining a small number of statements (then goes on to list the ones missing).

I appreciate this does not fully meet you requirements etc (too damn right it doesn't matey)

I can confirm that there has been no manual intervention on this account.

Should you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours sincerely........

 

So have as of today sent them this letter back:

 

David Cunningham

Customer Services Manager

GE Money

PO Box 700

Leeds

LS99 2BD

19th April 2007

Dear Mr Cunningham

Re: Subject Access Request

 

Thank you for your letter dated 18 April 2007. In this you state that you are unable to retrieve statements for September 2003, June to August 2004 and November 2004 to January 2005. I am surprised to be informed of this, as the Inland Revenue require companies to hold ALL their (and by default their customers) account/business transactions for at least 6 years (normal practice would be at least 7 years due to financial years being in April and delays in tax accounts processing).

You also do not appear to be able to retrieve statements from October 2004 to the present date, as you have not included these either.

I would also question how you can confirm that there has been no manual intervention on this account when your records appear to be so incomplete.

Once again I will state I require A COMPLETE LIST OF TRANSACTIONS AND CHARGES RELATING TO MY ACCOUNT HISTORY WITH YOUR ORGANISATION. Alternatively, a complete set of statements, appropriately filed, for that period will be acceptable.

Your 40 days for compliance was at an end as of 15th April 2007. On this date I sent your company a Letter Before Action giving you a further 7 calendar days to comply (to 22nd April 2007). In this letter I stated failure to comply with my Data Protection Act Subject Access Request dated 6th March 2007 would result in my seeking of a Court order obliging you to do so together with damages at the discretion of the Court and without any further notice. I will also seek any costs I have incurred such as fees for legal advice.

 

You still have until 22nd April 2007 to avoid court proceedings. If you choose to ignore this date and continue to be obstructive in this matter I will have no other recourse but to ensue court proceedings against you and report your actions to the Information Commissioners Office on the basis that you have breached the sixth data protection principle of The Data Protection Act 1988.

I trust this clarifies my position on this matter.

I await your considered response.

Yours sincerely

Mr Rory32

As todays the 19th I don't think they'll be able to meet the 22nd deadline, so on-line complaint will be filed with Info Commissioner on Monday. Apparently you can force SAR compliance by just doing this but I would like to take them to court as well just because I don't like being f**ked about. I'll let you know how it goes.

A case of tears before bedtime at GE Money I would think.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...