Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Kotum45 v Natwest **ANOTHER WON**


kotum45
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6487 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have just seen the five news which encouraged me to do a research and I found this site. However before I found this site I wrote an e-mail to Natwest regarding the charges going back only 3 months and I demanded them to be refunded. Also I only asked for £38 and £35 charges (2 £35 and 3 £38) which total £184. I think the other charges are for OD interest. Did I ruin it before I even started by asking for the past 3 months as I am scared it will look like I have accepted the previous charges.

 

Also I called the customer services and asked for all my statements in the past 6 years, they said "I need to call in the morning before I put the phone down the guy said " oh can you please wait as a customer manager wants to speak to you, it is just a quick review of your account" I said "tell him to call tomorrow" and put the phone down as I thought they might have guessed that I was about to start claiming charges.

Am I being paranoid???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am sure that they have guessed.

Don't worry.

Start again. Send the DPA letter in the library.

Calculate your charges

preliminary letter - 14 days

Letter before action 14 days

Send the Good News

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

Link to post
Share on other sites

The initial email is irrelevent

First Direct, £4031 Recovered

Halifax, £953 Recovered

MBNA Credit Card, £120 Recovered

American Express, £160 Recovered

Coming Soon......

Blackpool Council, £190 in unlawful parking tickets

Carstoppers. £50 from the cowboy clampers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one more question..

I am supposed to claiming only OD and DD charges right? I can't claim for charges for gold account or interest?

Also let's say by mistake I claim charges I shouldn't, wouldn't that make my case void.

This is my final silly question, I promise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the FAQs and the forum material and you will understand the principles upon which you are claiming.

Don't forget that you could end up in court and you had better understand what you are doing

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I require

I calculate that you have taken £XXXXX plus £XXX which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken. Total £XXXXX

 

I have copied the above sentence from the preliminary approach letter. I am confused about the "plus XXX" part. How do I calculate this? Is this the 8% statutory interest or is it different?

I am about to send the letter just making the last touches, could anyone please answer if you know the answer to my question.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, here goes.

 

The 8% part is only once you issue court claim, so don't worry about it just now.

 

The "+ xxx interest" part is for people who want to reclaim the additional interest that was levied on the charges, on the unauthorised o/draft, etc...

I personally think it's easier not to bother, just claim the charges, keep it simple. Also, it means that if the bank use the "we should be entitled to get something", the answer is "you are, you're getting to keep all the accrued interest".

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you might see from my first post, I had written an e-mail to Natwest asking for the charges for the past 6 months. At the time I didn't know that I could claim for 6 years.

Since then I sent them another e-mail asking them to disregard my first request as I will be making a claim for 6 years.

Today I received a reply, I will summarise it for you.

 

"We are sorry to hear you are not happy. All charges for the past 6 months are correct. You are claiming £184 but as a goodwill gesture we decided to refund you £100. In order to credit the money back into your account please sign below and send this letter to us."

 

At the bottom of the part I am supposed to sugn it says

" I agree that this is final and full settlement for this matter"

 

I am obviously not accpeting it.

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you seem to be more successful than me - at least you got an offer - but there again I would have been very surprised - nay shocked - if they had offered to repay any part of my claim (£2300) without a fight!

 

It appears that they know you are in the right and hope you will accept the lesser amount than fight for the full amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Unfortunately I don't know how much they owe me as they haven't sent me the statements dating back 6 years. At the time I made my initial claim I didn't know I could go back 6 years.

Anyway now I wrote to them refusing their offer and I told them that I will be suing them for all the charges going back 6 years. (Once I receive the statements)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Unfortunately I don't know how much they owe me as they haven't sent me the statements dating back 6 years. At the time I made my initial claim I didn't know I could go back 6 years.

Anyway now I wrote to them refusing their offer and I told them that I will be suing them for all the charges going back 6 years. (Once I receive the statements)

 

Shows the value of reading the FAQs and the forum material

Link to post
Share on other sites

bankfodder, i read FAQ but I was asked to sign a note saying this is the enof this matter and the charges that may occur after this will be charged to my account accordingly.

So I didn't want to ruin my chances of claiming for the past 6 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As mentioned above I was offered £100 by Natwest.

I sent one letter saying that I am rejecting their offer and that I would wait until my past statements and make a claim for the past years.

 

Straight after that I received another letter signed by another customer service representative saying that their offer is final and I should sign the bottom of the page and send it back to them. (I didn't respond)

My statements arrived and I sent the first letter asking for £1518 back. Today I received an e-mail saying this:

 

"Please find attached a copy of our letter to you dated 17 March, the

contents of which remain pertinent. Please let us know if you wish to accept

the offer to refund £100."

 

Yours sincerely

 

Frank Claydon

Customer Relations.

 

What the hell is wrong with these people?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was my reply;

 

Dear Frank,

 

Thank you for your e-mail. You can see from my previous e-mail that I have rejected your offer. In additon I have given Natwest 14 days to refund £1518 back to my account as this amount is the total of all the unlawful charges you have taken from my bank account. I am surprised that you are still offering me the same £100 when Amanda Jones knows that I have rejected the offer. Please check the trail of e-mails below and you will see that Amanda Jones sent me an e-mail confirming that I am not interested in your offer. You can either refund me the full £1518 or I will not hesitate to take this matter to court.

 

One final question, I suggest you start a small discussion within your department and try to find out how many people would accept a £100 offer when they are owed £1518.

 

Kind Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kotum45, that is a marvellous letter. Please please let us know as soon as you get a reply back!

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I received a reply to "preliminary approach letter" today this time from RBS Group Customer Relations. I haven't seen this letter on the forum so I thought I should share it with you.

 

Dear xxxx,

Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding charges, which has been passed to our office for investigation. In view of your comments, we have asked for a full briefing from those involved. Once this is received, a formal response will be sent to you.

 

We will aim to get a response out to you as soon as we can but we also want to make sure a thorough investigation takes place. If, for any reason, there looks like being a delay, we will, of course, write to you again to explain why.

If you do have any queries in the mean time, please feel free to contact us.

 

Yours Sincerely,

Aslam Abid,

Group Customer Relations.

 

Is it normal that I am being contacted by RBS Group rather than Natwest???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest are now owned by RBS. I'm not sure when the take-over happened, but it's been like that for a while now. Some RBS and Natwest branches even have the same sort codes as one another.

 

I guess they're now taking you pretty seriously if it's going through RBS. Either that, or they're such complete muppets that they've used the wrong stationery and standard letter.

DPA Letter received by NatWest 11/04/2006

DPA Request expires 21/05/2006

Statements received 15/05/2006

LBA sent 15/05/2006

 

If you find me vaguely coherent, click the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know they are owned by RBS but it is strange that their coroporate office is writing rather than Natwest. Either way time is ticking and I am looking forward to the deadline I have given them

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6487 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...