Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Seems good to me

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all! can someone help me out? i filed the papers with the court towards the end of May for £2200 in charges against LLoydstsb. they had untill 6 June to reply to the Court. spoke to the court today, they have not heard from LLoydstsb. does that mean i have won? sorry to sound dense............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have just received a response from Lloyds Bank to my bank charges reclaim letter. Their letter states that I am not receiving my claim as my charges were charges for "extra services" and they feel it is fair to make these charges as it "causes them extra work". They also claim that they are completely open about their charges to new customers by giving them a guide to their charges. The letter goes on and on about only applying to credit card charges and that the guidelines are about "default charges" that people pay when they have broken their agreement and that I have not broken my agreement with them. My charges are for unauthorised borrowing, unpaid direct debits etc.! They finish off by stating that they cannot agree to cancel my charges and that they will put me in touch with the Financial Ombudsman if I do not agree.

 

Could somebody please advise on my next move..... Help!

 

Many thanks to everybody for the information on this site!

that sounds exactly like the reply I received from lloyds today, so its probably a standard response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone, I have a copied this post from my other thread as I think I need some preety quite advice. from some very sharpe people. here goes.

 

I am back in court in 7 days over this blooming disposal hearing and although I have searched Google high and low I still haven't a clue what will happen. how can anyone go to a hearing and not talk:D :D :D from what I have read, if I want to rely on any evidence then it needs to be in court 3 days before the hearing due, that's tomorrow. I don't just want a monetary award from the courts I want my DI so unsure what he will direct. I also read on Google that the judge can change the track at this hearing if he thinks it should be allocated to a higher one :-| The reason I want my data is to not only claim all pre 6 yr chargers, I would like to prove that the loan given to me to consolidate my other loan and chargers was forced onto me due to them using my loan payments to pay unlawful chargers. Also I would like to know what happened to our PEP and Scottish Widows insurance policy and endowment policy that was mis-sold, we had loads going on with LTSB that I want to know what happened to all. Soooo at the hearing I don't just want to be awarded a small lump sum and that's the end of it, do you get what i mean? I need to be able to say that by not providing me with this info i have or will suffered a great financial loss. ( you only have to look at O/Hs loan, to prove this point, he would have paid this had it not been for the banks not providing a LA and Gary's help in sorting it)

Who has to supply the onus of prove, me or the bank.

what should I write which I will need to rely on in court to prove I have suffered a finacial loss by not having all my data documants.

any ideas?

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daz, I think It's under a thread called wayback machine by mastermind, sorry MM if it's not yours.

 

pen

 

My cousin mastermind is on hols, so I might as well answer for him. He is not guilty, he wasn't there, he has an alibi.

 

To research any topic, e.g. wayback machine,

click SEARCH

ADVANCED SEARCH

set keyword to wayback

show results as posts

 

And Robert is your father's brother.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry mm

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well, the day's arrived. I am in court this morning for my dispoosal hearing hopfully the judge will direct LTSB to povide me with all my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) information so I can start claiming beyound 6 years and everything else they have deprived me off.

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eric.

I have wrote it all done on my thread pen-v-Lloyds Tsb, well worth a read.

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys ive been reading all the threads on the lloyds forum and i have a court date for the 27th of July which means i have to submit my domuments on or before the 13th. Now im a bit confused as to what i need to send in. Do i need to send in my full bundle now? it says that i need a signed witness statement which i must serve with the court in support defence of my claim. Is there anything else i need?

 

Also ive been reading about people submiting their allocation questionnaire. At no point can i remember anyone asking this of me. Have i missed something out? is it very important that i submit this?

 

Am i right in thinking i dont need to submit the full bundle just a basic one because its only its just the 'Notice of allocation ot the small claims track (hearing)? If so what should i include in this basic bundle???

 

 

Regards, Nathan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone.

Just a quick question.

 

does anyone know how much LTSB charged in bank chargers during the 70s and 80s.

 

thanks

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi I have just managed to get statements dating back to 2001 from the Lloyds although they made me wait 76 days. What I am confused about is where I go from here, as I have told them I wanted to claim in 2008 & they said it had to wait until the court outcome. How do I now tell them that I want to go back to 2001, is it simply a letter or is it more technical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Lloyds TSB refer to the Forced Lending as an 'unplanned overdraft'. They try to argue that you request an 'unplanned overdraft' whenever someone requests payment for funds that you don't have. Does anyone Know the consumer credit act in relation to Forced Lending. Can a regulated body such as Lloyds TSB force a person to borrow without that persons consent. Must they not sign a credit agreement before the loan can be enforced upon them, with the relevent cooling off periods etc.?

What happens when a loan is made without the recipients consent, can such a loan be recognised in law or is this illeagle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...