Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Actually there wasn't a massive amount of work to do on the WS.  The "meat" was there because of the great work you'd already done. Here is a version which I think is nigh-on finished. However, with Easter there are a few days for the other regulars to suggest tweaks. Defendant WS.pdf
    • Hi all, We bought a part to fix our washing machine approx 13 months ago direct from the manufacturer of the washing machine via phone. This part then failed 13 months later, as confirmed by their own engineer, who was sent by the manufacturer (who is also the retailer for the part) FoC. The engineer actually installed a replacement part, the machine came back to life, but they then removed the part used for testing (and ours reinstalled) as "we would be charged for it". The retailer are refusing to replace the part, stating that they only warranty parts for 90 days. When I stated that I believed the Consumer Rights Act gives me longer than that, they insinuated that it did not, and this was repeated by many representatives. AIUI for goods bought more than 6 months ago, I need to get an engineers report to confirm the part has failed? Or that it has failed due to manufacturing issues? Or would the companies own engineers report suffice? Also, does anyone have any other decent contact details for Hotpoint (or the Whirlpool group)? Thanks, GH
    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA-Link: 3 different copies of alleged agreements!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6083 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

Better late than never, but I did promise to post copies of the alleged agreements I received from MBNA!

 

I must point out that these "agreements" were sent as part of a SAR, and not a CCA request.

 

 

So here they are:

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned3b.jpg

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned3a.jpg

 

 

 

 

Here are the computer print out notes for this application:

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned3c.jpg

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned3d.jpg

 

 

 

 

Please note: "Application" was declined! Therefore this cannot be an agreement!

 

 

 

 

Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

 

 

 

The third "agreement":

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned1a.jpg

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned1b.jpg

 

 

 

 

Again, the computer print out notes:

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned1c.jpg

 

 

 

 

MBNAScanned1d.jpg

 

 

 

 

Yet again, the "application" was declined!

 

The alleged account actually pre dates all of these applications.

 

None of these three applications actually refer to the alleged account!

 

This has got to be why an application form cannot be an agreement!

 

 

 

Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jeff

This is extremely interesting as it shows as you say quite clearly that what we are led to believe is a credit agreement can only be an application form.

 

I'm awaiting my CCA's which will or will not be here by the end of the month and we shall see what turns up as far as "agreements" are concerned.

 

Thank you for posting this it'll help a lot of us. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jeff

This is extremely interesting as it shows as you say quite clearly that what we are led to believe is a credit agreement can only be an application form.

 

I'm awaiting my CCA's which will or will not be here by the end of the month and we shall see what turns up as far as "agreements" are concerned.

 

Thank you for posting this it'll help a lot of us. :)

 

 

Hello Vampyra,

 

Thanks for your comments.

 

These "agreements" were in response to a SAR. I have however now sent a CCA request to MBNA. Let's see what they send! The 12+ 1 month is up tomorrow, oh dear!

 

 

Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm in a thick mode...or maybe its the bottle of Cava I got as an Xmas pressie that I'm now drinking! But...if an application for credit/credit card was declined....how can you have an agreement? Would it be an agreement not to have credit, and not to use the credit card you applied for but didn't get?

Surely if you applied for a credit card...the application process, and were declined...there was no Consumer Credit Agreement...as no credit was approved or agreed.

Well I may be talking gobblygook, or I may have missed something (its the 2 glasses of Cava) but I wish you good luck.

Zim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm in a thick mode...or maybe its the bottle of Cava I got as an Xmas pressie that I'm now drinking! But...if an application for credit/credit card was declined....how can you have an agreement? Would it be an agreement not to have credit, and not to use the credit card you applied for but didn't get?

Surely if you applied for a credit card...the application process, and were declined...there was no Consumer Credit Agreement...as no credit was approved or agreed.

Well I may be talking gobblygook, or I may have missed something (its the 2 glasses of Cava) but I wish you good luck.

Zim

 

 

Hello Zimmie,

 

 

That's exactly the point we are trying to make.

 

They're application forms, and nothing else. None of them apply to the alleged account in any case. They haven't even sent an application form for the alleged account! Just those three applications, which, as you are aware, were all declined!

 

Don't you just love MBNA???:grin::grin::grin:

 

What do they take us for?

 

 

Cheers, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello,

 

 

Still nothing from them.

 

I have now sent them a letter informing them of their CCA default!

 

Awaiting a reply. Not holding my breath!!!:D

 

Link, who now own the "alleged" debt, have also not supplied an agreement.

They are still sending letters though. Sent letters etc to Trading Standards, who actually stated they were interested in my case!!!:eek:

 

So, lets see what transpires next!

 

 

Cheers, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have you received sight of your cca from MBNA yet??

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

 

I have received absolutely nothing at all from MBNA!!!

 

No response! Nothing!

 

 

Now then. From Link I received, a while ago, a letter saying they were contacting the OC in order to obtain a copy of my agreement, but this may take some time. (No s***!)

 

They also said that the account was on hold for 14 days! (I think it is on hold until the default is remedied!)

 

After the 14 days, I received another letter asking to contact them etc. It also said that their investigation dept will search for any assets that I may have! That was about a week ago. (copy of this letter was e-mailed to my local TS!)

 

I am just about to reply to both MBNA and Link, basically telling them that they can sod off without any CCA!

 

 

Regards, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

 

I have recently received, from Link Financial, what they claim to be my CCA agreement.

 

So it now seems that I have 4 alleged agreements!!!:o

 

 

I have posted it on my other thread here:

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/58913-mbna-link-financial.html

 

 

 

Just out of interest, would the fact that MBNA failed to provide a copy of this particular alleged agreement when I SAR'd them, have any bearing on this case?

 

 

Regards, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...