Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
    • Is this place near to you? I ask for two reasons. If you can easily go back, then get photos of the signs.  On GM and Parkopedia there are various comments about the signs being pants. Also go back to the school uniform shop and ask the manager there for contact details for the retail park (which I've Googled & Googled and got nowhere).  The school uniform shop will just be tenants of the retail park, they won't be able to do anything.  It will be the retail park that called EPC in, and we've seen loads of cases where the organ grinder has intervened and called off the monkey.  As for EPC, aye, ignore them until LoC stage.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help responding to Abbey Letter


lolakahha
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone - i have sent my prelim and LBA, submitted my claim via MCOL, shabbey have acknowledged and now sent me the following letter - in which incidentally, they spelt my name wrong, and dated the letter 4th March - I only submitted my claim on 22nd March 2007! :eek:

 

"We are in the process of reviewing this claim and preparing our response. A defence will be filed in due course.

 

In the meantime, we note that you have claimed the sum of £2,682.41 in respect of charges that you say have been made on your Abbey account. We appreciate that you may have previously forwarded details of your claim to our internal Complaints department however, we do not access to that information. To expedite the processing of your claim could you therefore please provide to us:

 

(i) details of how you have calculated your claim by date and amount of each charge claimed;and

 

(ii) details of how the interest is calculated, showing how interest is calculated by reference to each charge.

 

As you will appreciate you will need to produce evidence to the court regarding these amounts, and this information should have been appended to your claim form when you filed your claim. we should be grateful if you would provide such details to us as soon as possible.

 

It would also be helpful at this stage if you can provide e-mail and telephone contact details to us.

 

We look forward to hearing from you"

 

:-D

I assume it is reasonable to respond appropriately to this letter, providing AGAIN the s/s showing the charges and interest calculation? Don't want to be seen as being obstructive!

 

Also, bit miffed at the bit where they say this should have been appended to the claim - I submitted to court the same day I submitted claim, no other way to do it if you use MCOL is there?

 

Finally, i'm actually doing all of this on behalf of my fiance, he doesn't particularly want to deal with them over the phone, is it reasonable to withhold telephone numbers and request that all communication be written?

 

Thanks so much for your help everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage, I would INSIST that all communication be by letter. Keep copies of all letters, yours and theirs.

You can then refer to them later if you need to without trying to remember exactly what either pary did or didn't say.

 

Regards, Rooster.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd insist on it, nothing is done at this late stage by email or telephone. Where a claim has been submitted, forward a copy of any letters you send to them to the Court. This is all covered by your Court fee, and you will receive confirmation from the Court that it has been filed and stamped. Let the Shabbey know you are communicating it to the Court, which will show unreasonable behaviour with respect to settlement. Don't forget to add the interest rates applied in the s/s, they must then settle or give a very good reason to defend it, else, go for the Abuse of Process scenario.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lola & TideTurner - very sorry to 'butt in', but am at very similar stage with my claim against Abbey (thread is "Tish vs Abbey"), and find this thread very interesting, especially the reference to 'Abuse of Process' secnario. Could you by any chance tell me where to find more about this - I'd already figured from Patricia Pearl's book that this was possibly a very good alternative to preparing the whole Court bundle, only for Abbey to settle immediately before the hearing. Previous history seems to show Abbey never intend to actually defend in Court, thereby abusing the Court process! In other words, how does one go about claiming 'Abuse of Process' to the Court?

 

With many thanks (and apols!) - Adam.

I do my best to be helpful, but at the end of the day I'm not a professional - please seek further advice if you're not sure. On the other hand, if I have helped, please click my scales - thanks ;)

 

Current Claims (all for friends!) -

 

Abbey - over £4k - Court claim issued & AQ filed ('Tish vs Abbey'). Alloc'n Hearing 21 Sept - Claim stayed 29/8/07.

Cap One - just under £2k - WON (just over 2k!)('Tish vs Cap One')

Cap One - just under £1000 - WON (just over £1k) Nov 07 (JimmyBoy vs Cap One)

Lloyds TSB - £3.5k - Court claim issued, defence rec'd and AQ filed; Alloc'n hearing 7th Sept Claim stayed 29/8/07! (JimmyBoy vs Lloyds')

MBNA - over £1k for mis-sold PPI - WON - approx £1500(IpswichWitch vs MBNA . . .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lola & TideTurner - very sorry to 'butt in', but am at very similar stage with my claim against Abbey (thread is "Tish vs Abbey"), and find this thread very interesting, especially the reference to 'Abuse of Process' secnario. Could you by any chance tell me where to find more about this - I'd already figured from Patricia Pearl's book that this was possibly a very good alternative to preparing the whole Court bundle, only for Abbey to settle immediately before the hearing. Previous history seems to show Abbey never intend to actually defend in Court, thereby abusing the Court process! In other words, how does one go about claiming 'Abuse of Process' to the Court?

 

With many thanks (and apols!) - Adam.

 

Adam,

 

See Kazzaw's post here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/20752-kazzaw-lloyds-asset-card.html?highlight=kazzaw#post467620

 

and also look at post 219.

 

Tide

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks, Tide - hugely interesting. Will almost certainly reference it on my AQ. Adam.

I do my best to be helpful, but at the end of the day I'm not a professional - please seek further advice if you're not sure. On the other hand, if I have helped, please click my scales - thanks ;)

 

Current Claims (all for friends!) -

 

Abbey - over £4k - Court claim issued & AQ filed ('Tish vs Abbey'). Alloc'n Hearing 21 Sept - Claim stayed 29/8/07.

Cap One - just under £2k - WON (just over 2k!)('Tish vs Cap One')

Cap One - just under £1000 - WON (just over £1k) Nov 07 (JimmyBoy vs Cap One)

Lloyds TSB - £3.5k - Court claim issued, defence rec'd and AQ filed; Alloc'n hearing 7th Sept Claim stayed 29/8/07! (JimmyBoy vs Lloyds')

MBNA - over £1k for mis-sold PPI - WON - approx £1500(IpswichWitch vs MBNA . . .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adam,

 

Nice to meet someone who's at about the same stage no probs for "butting in" all welcome, the more the merrier!! Good luck with your claim, i'll keep an eye on your progress!! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...