Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Other half-Vs-LloydsTSB


satellitemandaz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have now started but for my other half, why I have took so long I will never know:sad:

Anyway other half Vs Lloyds via me, via CAG:-)

 

1.Data Protection Act request letter DONE:grin:

Penny Berryman

Senior Manager

Data Protection Dept.

Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

The Pentagon

48, Chiswell Street

London

EC1Y 4XX

 

2.Preliminary approach letter DONE:grin:

LloydsTSB

125 Colmore Row

B3 3SF.

Sent with Simple-charges-calc. without interest

 

Got back:

Dear Mrs XXXX

Thank you for getting in touch with us. I am sorry you are unhappy about your account charges.

Like any business, we do make a charge for some of our extra services.

 

3.Letter Before Action = Sent 10/04/07 Recorded

Sending Simple-charges-calc without interest

To:

LloydsTSB Bank plc

25 Gresham Street,

London,

EC2V 7HN

 

It was good to see the web site on Whistle blower, Nice one lads

Cheers Daz:)

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am trying to fill in the N1 form, but whats the best way to find out when you opened the account, will Lloyds tell us? Also will someone send a link to S.69 the daily rate x 0.00022 = Pence per day bit as it goes over my head, Many thanks :-)

Darren

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only important thing about the date is the date of the first charge - so if you don't know the date the account was opened - put the date of the first charge you are claiming

 

S69 daily interest is as simple as you have posted i.e total claim x0.00022 = daily amount of interest claimed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Long Delay, but filled in the N1 form today, when working out X 0.00022 it comes to £0.50798 Do I round this up to £0.51p, or leave it at £0.50p, also do you take this to court or post it?

Many thanks in advance :-)

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, I will drop it in tomorrow, do they like cash or CHQs? is it buy now pay later LOL

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Lloyds have 14 days from the date the claim was served (it is served 5 days after you filed it) to acknowledge the claim, and 28 days from the date it was served to enter a defence. You will then receive a copy of their defence and you may receive an Allocation Questionnaire to fill in.

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello everyone :-)

Got a letter back from the Court Dated 28 sept, it say's This case is stayed with immediate effect pending the final determination of the case in the commercial court, it has the Defendants (Lloyds TSB) letter fixed to it, Lloyds TSB also sent one direct from SECHIARI, CLARK & MITCHELL Solicitors saying We have acknowledged receipt of your above claim and issued notice of intention to defend it.:confused:

 

What do I do next, its all beyond me, give me a satellite system to sort out and i'm OK :)

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like your court is blanket staying everything, its up to you whether you appeal against it but a major factor now has to be the court listing time.

 

The courts seem to be listing hearings between 6 and 12 weeks from when you ask for one so your stay appeal hearing wouldn't be until December/January. IF you got the stay lifted you would then have another 6 to 12 weeks to wait for a hearing for your claim. The test case is due to start in January and most people seem to think the first instance judgment should be in March.

 

My personal opinion is sit back and wait.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for that, just started printing out N244 form just in case, have looked at BBC report BBC NEWS | Business | OFT may compromise on bank case

what is going to happen in Jan/Feb 2008 ?

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one knows for sure, the OFT make silly statements like that one. The FSA seem to have more influence than they should have... think the general consensus is the banks wont win if it does get to court but who knows what agreements the banks will try to put in place or how long any appeals against the judgment will take.

 

one thing is for sure, the courts are sitting on a mountain sized time bomb now all these stays are in place and sooner or later they will want to get rid of them :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

"one thing is for sure, the courts are sitting on a mountain sized time bomb now all these stays are in place and sooner or later they will want to get rid of them :-)"

 

True, just wish I had done it all sooner

;) YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERYDAY;) Even a small donation will be of help and will be very much appreciated.Help the site many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...