Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BT Penalty Charge for termination***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

unfortunately our new place has never had a bt line installed so they want to charge us 120 for that. I am in the process of trying to find out who provided service to the previous tennant but am having a HELL of a time in doing so.

Anyone know who doesnt use BT for line rental? I know its not a cable provider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the other companies wholesale rent the lines from BT (post#14 from Buzby).

They might not have had a line installed, and just used mobiles?

When i lived in a flat thats what i did, you got free mins on mobile contract so why pay for a home line, unless you need internet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As PKea notes, the reason BT want the fee is that the line may never have been previously activated. There are only 3 ways to get a phone line, BT, Cable and Kingston Comms (in Hull). Many house builders pre-wire buildings, but if the owners doesn't have the connection made, it sits there awaiting the first customer to request it. However, what is the logo on the Master socket (if you have one)? If it is BT, they probably DID wire it up, so its worth pursuing them again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I received a reply, or at least a response

 

Dear PKea

Thank you for your email dated 1/5/07 about re:Re: ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxM).

I am very sorry to hear of the difficulties you have experienced.

I am sorry you have not yet received any confirmation regarding this complaint. If you would forward this information to us with your account number and we can look into this for you again.

Once again please accept my apologies for the problems you have experienced with BT recently.

Thank you for contacting BT.

Yours sincerely,

Lydia Beetham

BT Customer Services

 

Brilliant organisation, can't even keep a log of their complaints!!!!

 

I dont know whether to respond with all their log numbers, tell them to find it themselves or just ignore them now

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

well... success for me at least. had a call from bt on saturday and they have waived the cancellation fee plus given me 25 quid compensation... my final bill arrived today and it was £9. all paid up and see ya later BT.

PKEA the number that called me was 01793597829. Customer Resulutions team. give them a ring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Done, missm

 

I'm happy to leave to account in dispute for the time being, i have given them ample oportunity to resolve the matter and they have just lost the complaint details.

I will email them in a week or so with all their references but they want my bill paid so its up to them to sort the dispute out and then they will get paid.

I'm in no rush to part with £400, which is what i owe them, so when they sort this out they can have their money. I'm not going to their running around for them

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha Ha

 

Got a letter from the 'PRE COURT DIVISION' of Moorcroft DCA at the weekend, the cheeky ba%^rds have added another £170 quidish onto the debt as 'clients cost'.

Also advised me that if i pay up, BT will let me have a pay as you go account with them.

lol, my line rental has gone to the Phone CoOp!! no more BT

 

I couldnt ressit but phone Moorcroft on saturday and ask how they were going to take me to court without evidence that i agreed to it.

I also told them that i had it in writing from BT that BT didnt have the evidence as well.

They asked me to send all copies of the correspondance to them. I told them that as they were the pre court division they must have compelling evidence already in their possession.

And that I would produce my documentation when they take me to court.

I also asked for a full breakdown of the costs added before i woudl entertain paying them as well..

 

They hung up...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Got another letter from the 'PRE COURT DIVISION' with bold letters stating 'NOTICE OF INTENDING LITIGATION'

blah blah blah

 

I'm going to send the cca letter to them with bold letters on 'NOTICE OF INTENDING COUNTERCLAIM' to match their letter as close as i can...lol

 

Also i have paid some of BT's money, the part i dont dispute, direct to BT.

 

I thinks its entertaining when you phone a dca and ask them to explain how they can take yu to court without any evidence, thay usually hang up there.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA letter probably won;t be relevant - so expect a rejection. As to the 'Counterclaim' notice - I used to like this idea, until I realised it served NO purpose whatsoever. The time for a counterclaim is within the initial court documents. These customer responses are seldom, if ever read - and usually get scanned into your account file and no further action (by them) is taken. The computer runs the show.

 

If you want to keep things practical,you respond by REJECTING their assertion, give them notice of the reasons why, and state this letter will be used as part of any counterclaim you might consider.

 

Not as satisfying, but more practical if you do go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You had to spoil my fun.....LOL

 

I am trying to draft a letter along the lines of 'harrasment' and 'sending threatening letters designed to intimidate', but cant seem to get it started as of yet.

 

Think i will just put that i have written evidence form BT that states they have no record of me agreeing to any contract. Also i will state that I require a breakdown of their costs.

 

Another thing on their latest letter was a figure of £25 for obtaining 'Judgement by Default' .LOL they are a bit presumptious that i wont respond to court docs and get they have to apply for J by D

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Then

 

I have decided to write one last letter to BT including a copy of all previous emails sent and recieved

 

To Whom it May Concern

You have proved beyond doubt to me that your organisation is unprofessional as it cannot even keep track of its complaints, let alone resolve them.

It seems that rather than dealing with the problem raised by your customer, you would rather ignore and send uninformative replies then just pass the account to a debt collector and wash your hands of the problem.

I will now only acept a full credit to my account of the amount in dispute.

This will be my final communication on this matter, and as stated on previous communications I will vigorously defend any court action by either yourselves or your appointed debt collectors.

PKea

Also i am teasing Moorcroft by making part payments of the amount I dont dispute direct to BT. I have quite a collection of 'You have paid BT direct. Pay us not BT' letters now.

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

BT tried to call me last night, but I didn't answer, so I recieved this email

 

Dear Mr PKea

Thank you for your e-mail dated 5/6/07 regarding the penalty charges appeared on the bill.

I am sorry for the delay incurred in resolving your query.

I attempted to ring you this evening at 19:05 hrs on the mobile number 07xxxxxxxxxx that you have kindly provided, unfortunately there was no reply. I did however leave a brief message to explain that I had called.

I would humbly request you to write to me a daytime contact number (a mobile number or your work number preferably) to get in touch with you at any time of the day, so that the issue can be resolved without any further delay.

Alternatively, you can contact our Customer Services Department on 0800 800 150 (Working hours 7:30 AM to 10 PM, Monday - Saturday, 9 AM to 6 PM Sunday).

Thank you for contacting BT.

Yours sincerely,

S Thulaseedharan Kamala

eContact Customer Service

So I am just about to reply to this email stating that all correspondance relating will only be dealt with in writing.

 

You should have heard the voicemail message he left, took me and the wife ages to try and guess whether it was a recorded message or a real person. Glad i didnt try to talk to him cos i wouldnt have understood him anyway

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my reply

 

Dear Sirs

Please note that all correspondance regarding this matter to be in writing either by email or post,

I would be grateful if you could provide a direct email to a specific person who is going to deal with this problem all the way through, as each time i respond to one of your emails, someone new gets involved.

How you can have continuity of client care with that system is beyond me.

PKea

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

*** WON ***

 

I recieved this email this morning

 

Dear Mr PKea

 

Thank you for your e-mail dated 8/6/07 regarding the cancellation charges.

 

In response to your email, I would like to apologise for all the

inconvenience caused. I can confirm that I have refunded £217.32. There is no outstanding balance on your account. You will receive a credit

confirmation letter with in 7 days.

 

Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us

again via e-mail.

 

Thank you for contacting BT.

Yours sincerely,

xxx xxx

eContact Customer Service

Ref: xxxxx

 

Thanks for your help and Input Buzby

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs - can I suggest (and not to take the gloss of things) before you sign off on this, just do a quick £2 check of your credit file. As it's been around 3 months to resolution, it has been known for BT to log defaults in this way FIRST, rather than away a resolution. If they've been that shabby - you can still hit them for compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs - can I suggest (and not to take the gloss of things) before you sign off on this, just do a quick £2 check of your credit file. As it's been around 3 months to resolution, it has been known for BT to log defaults in this way FIRST, rather than away a resolution. If they've been that shabby - you can still hit them for compensation.

 

Ok Will do later today,

 

Also i got a letter from Moorcroft yesterday acknowledging reciept of my £1 payment 'towards the account'.

Well that means they have received my CCA request then.

I'm sure they will be over the moon when BT tell then 'Your servces are no longer required'.

Then i will chase them for the £1 payment they have taken from me, might even have to get the debt collectors involved..lol

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Will do later today,

 

Also i got a letter from Moorcroft yesterday acknowledging reciept of my £1 payment 'towards the account'.

Well that means they have received my CCA request then.

I'm sure they will be over the moon when BT tell then 'Your servces are no longer required'.

Then i will chase them for the £1 payment they have taken from me, might even have to get the debt collectors involved..lol

 

Paul

 

Hi Paul

Firstly congratulations!!

It's great how you stood your ground with BT and documented everything here.It shows people that "giants" like the Bank's and BT can no longer do as they please with their customers!!!

WELL DONE!!!! :)

If my advice has helped please click my scales

 

Should you require any further help feel free to pm me.

Nat West 2nd Acc

Prelim letter sent 8th Feb '07

:) Full Settlement Offer 24th Feb '07:)

:pMONEY BACK IN ACC ON MARCH THE FIRST '07:p

 

 

Nat West 1st Acc

Filed at court 2nd of Feb '07

Acknowledged on 15th of Feb '07

:rolleyes: Defence submitted 1st March 2007 :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul

Firstly congratulations!!

It's great how you stood your ground with BT and documented everything here.It shows people that "giants" like the Bank's and BT can no longer do as they please with their customers!!!

WELL DONE!!!! :)

 

Thanks

 

If i wasnt for what ive learned on this site i would have just presumed i would have had to pay up.

 

I question every charge on anything now...

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha Ha.. Do BT talk to Moorcroft

 

Got a letter from Moorcroft yesterday thanking me for Paying BT £200, but insist all future payments go to them, and the balance outstanding is still £217 quid an dthey will take me to court,blah blah blah..

 

Anyway i have another thread regarding my dealing s with moorcroft on this case and how i have turned the tables and are going to be chasing them foir money soon

If youre interested heres the link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/97877-turning-tables-im-chasing.html#post909536

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...