Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rainbow005 vs. Lloyds TSB


rainbow005
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5840 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

just popping in to start my thread regarding reclaimation of my charges from Lloyds TSB:

 

13th March - sent DPA letter for schedule of charges.

 

That's it so far - no acknowledgement or reply as yet from the bank. 40 days ticking away.

 

Oh, forgot to add - strangely the ability to view my statements on-line has been removed from my account. Coincidence? Who else has noticed this?

 

Will keep you updated.

 

Rainbow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rainbow, welcome :) Good luck with your claim. Not that you need it of course ;) stick to the advice and the step by step guide and you'll be fine

 

Apparently this was happening earlier on this week. Me personally? I can view my statments at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi nanaman,

 

good luck with your own claim too.

 

I've been reading as many of the threads as possible and it looks as though LloydsTSB are employing as many panic-driven tactics as possible to throw people off the path of reclaiming charges.

 

That's why it's so important to keep up to date with everyone's experiences and stay prepared for whatever they may try next!

 

Rainbow

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update:

 

13th March - sent DPA letter for schedule of charges.

17th April - schedule of charges received totalling £1,110

 

The accompanying cover letter is almost goading me into requesting further statements going back for as long as I've held the account (which is around 15 years in total).

 

However, for now I think I'll just proceed within the six year time frame.

 

Preliminary letter for refund of £1,100 will be sent on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've just spoken to Lloyds who have informed me that there is absolutely no way I would be able to get a copy of the terms and conditions that were in force at the time my account was opened in 1995.

 

They say that, in specific relation to charges, no information pertaining to 'how much' they would charge me for for a specific item would have been contained in the T's and C's anyway - but that they periodically send out a 'tariff of charges' whenever the amounts charged are changed (ie: 'upped'!).

 

What do I do now? Can I still submit my claim to the court without being able to obtain a copy of the terms and conditions for my account at the time it was opened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they wont provide you with eveidence against themselves. Other than one you own as your right to obtain, eg your statements. Yes go ahead and claim, there are people on here who may have some t&c's for you should it get that far. Thats a long way off yet.

Have you sent prelim letter? then the LBA? not sure why you are talking of Court at such a early stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

yes, I'vew sent the prelim letter on 30th April, and the LBA on 16th May. No response from Llyds since either of those letters, so now starting the claim.

 

Thanks for your comments,

Kirsty

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

God, I hope I don't sound too stupid when I ask this!

 

I want to let an administrator or sitehelper know about the start of my claim - but how do I contact one? And is an 'administrator' the same as a 'moderator'?

 

Thanks,

Rainbow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Form N244 - Ammending particulars of claim Dont forget it will cost you £35 to ammend it :)

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

Yet another crappy, rainy day - and yet more crap from Lloyds: standard 9 point defence received in this morning's post, along with an allocation questionnaire.

 

Am I correct in thinking that, as my claim is under £1,500, the AQ fee does not apply? There isn't any indication as to what the fee is/would be with the paperwork from the court anyway.

 

Have a good evening everyone.

 

Rainbow

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not done so already then do not amend your claim, it will cost you £35 and is non refundable and will delay your claim. Once this claim is finished you can start again.

 

Again if you have not done so already then you can PM me with your litigation details.

 

These should help you complete the AQ, New Strategy really a must now:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Afternoon,

 

I'm ready to send my court bundle in, but have a question:

 

- is there a court form that I have to use to present the court bundle?

 

Or do I simply get all the paperwork together and put a covering note/letter with it summarising the paperwork being submitted?

 

Cheers,

Kirsty

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Evening all,

 

Have been away for some time and haven't thought about my court claim against LTSB for quite a while (since last summer, in fact!).

 

On the 10th September last year, I received a notice from the court stating that my claim was being stayed. The actual wording on the General Form of Judgement or Order was "... hearing on 28th September 2007 is vacated...", which I assume is the same as "stayed".

 

What do I do next? Can I simply ring up the court and ask them to continue with my claim?

 

Thanks,

Kirsty

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is just a waiting game.

 

I am not holding my breath, I think we will be waiting until the end of 2009 before we get any real progress.

 

I just do not see how they can take the claims off hold, when the courts have not decided if the charges are fair / unlawful.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...