Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

gazuk Vs HSBC


gazuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have recently decided to start my claim against HSBC. I have had many charges for going over my overdraft, DD reversed etc etc.

 

I have been using my messages feature of the HSBC website to send the initial DPA but i just received the following;

 

I regret that it is not possible for us to order you a statement with all charges applied to your Bank Account. However, you can view charges applied to your Bank Account by viewing historic statements.

 

Please note that you can view all transactions on the last statement plus any made since, with the most recent first, up to 90.

 

Currently you can view historic statements up to six years old through the Historic Statements facility in Personal Internet Banking. You can do so by the following the instructions below:

 

1. From 'My Accounts', select the account for which you wish to view your statement.

 

2. Next, click on the 'My Statements' icon located on the left-hand navigation panel.

 

3. Select the statement you wish to view.

 

The screen will display the first 100 transactions. You can scroll the list to view more transactions from the selected statement. You can sort the transactions from My Accounts in the following way:

 

o Date (ascending/descending)

o Type (alphabetical)

o Description (alphabetical)

o Amount paid in/out (descending)

 

You can click on the twistie next to the required column heading. The running balance will not show on any sort option other than date.

 

I trust this clarifies matters.

 

Obviously this doesnt help me in any way. Can anybody suggest what I should do?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

write to their Data Protection dept, including the £10 and request a full schedule of transactions and charges and details of any manual intervention.

 

They will not necessarily supply this information in the form of statements, but they must supply it. They have 40 days.

 

What wording did you use on your secure messages? Did you give them the authority to take the £10 fee? I'm wondering whether you can reasonably tell them the 40 days has already started, but this will depend on exactly what you asked for in the secure messages.

... a little

Mahala is a powerful thing ...

 

If you like my advice, please click the scales.

All advice is offered informally. If in any doubt, seek professional advice.

Barclays:claiming £908. Defence filed

Simply Be: settled in full

Abbey: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

GE Capital: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

Aktiv Kapital: Failed to comply with CCA disclosure. Debt unenforceable.

If this site has helped you, please make a donation to help keep it going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply. I think I will probably do exactly what you said, I stupidly assumed that I could get a results through the HSBC website.

 

As an aside, I already have my statements and have nearly finished calculating the charges myself, but I am a little unsure of what the manual interventions (if any) will mean when they eventually turn up. Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can bet nothing about manual interventions will turn up. it means that someone actually had to do something on your account because you went overdrawn/had a payment returned/bounced a cheque. The charges are automated, and and a human being didn't go through your account to add the charge and see what you spent £4.53 on at the corner shop.

 

The point of asking for it is to give the bank a reasonable chance to show that they incurred costs because someone had to manually work on your account because of your offence. The fact they they can't/won't give these details can be taken to mean that there are no detials to give - the charge does not reflect their true costs i.e. it didn't cost them £30 for a computer to add the charge and a letter to be sent. It probably didn't cost them much more than 50p.

 

it's worth going ahead with the DPA, if only for this manual intervention bit. If you end up going to court, you'll have the proof you gave them this opportunity.

... a little

Mahala is a powerful thing ...

 

If you like my advice, please click the scales.

All advice is offered informally. If in any doubt, seek professional advice.

Barclays:claiming £908. Defence filed

Simply Be: settled in full

Abbey: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

GE Capital: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

Aktiv Kapital: Failed to comply with CCA disclosure. Debt unenforceable.

If this site has helped you, please make a donation to help keep it going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, in which case I could send a DPA tomorrow, finish calculating my charges and then send the pre lim ? or would I have to wait for the DPA to come back?

 

This is such great news, I still keep thinking "it cant be true!" :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gaz,

 

HSBC online messaging is sh*t - best to make ALL communications through your local branch. Their internal processes will ensure that the correct person receives your letters.

 

If you know your figures, then issue your preliminary letter when you want - as others say, no need to wait for the results of the DPA request. However, if there HAS been manual intervention, you will need to be aware of this when rasing your claim (although reading the other HSBC threads it is clear that all they send is statements)

 

You may want to wait until 12 days into the DPA request before sending the prelim. This means that when it is time to raise your claim (28 days later), the DPA deadline will have passed, and you won't be subjected to any nasty surprises.

 

Good luck - keep us posted.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great tips guys, thank you.

 

Having read my statements there is very little information on what the charges relate to. Obviously when I see a reversal there is generally an associated charge not too many lines down. I however see that on the 27 of several months I am seeing "total charges - £72" I seem to remember them telling me it was a charge once when they were trying to sell me a loan. Does anybody see similar things?

 

I am just worried that when I send my prelim, they will throw it back saying the actuall figure is £xxx. Does anybody have any information about what happens should your claim be inaccurate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, if the charge reduces the balance then it's been debited. I had the same confusion, well, OK, not confusion but I couldn't understand why they'd charge for bouncing a DD on a few occasions and then further down the statement they'd charge for *total charges* too.

 

I think I figured it out in the end. They charge for each refusal at the time of refusal. However, for each occasion you increase your unauthorised overdraft they also charge you but this charge is only deducted once a month. Therefore, the way it worked for me was:

 

Get paid. Account in credit. Spend some money. Drink some beer / wine. Buy some food. Account still in credit. Pay a few DD's. Still in credit. Go out again and drink. Get carried away. Ooops, no money left in account. Charges from previous month applied (used to be £72 here, £54 there but now £25 per *offence* subject to maximum of 5 offences so usually £125). Overdrawn. Charge of £25 registered for collection following month because overdrawn. DD collected. Overdraft increased. Another £25 charge registered. DD refused. £32 charge applied immediately. Another £25 charge registered. Maestro payment paid. Another £25 charge registered. And so it continues until once again I get paid. Once paid the cycle starts again.

 

So, in a nutshell, they charge you once a month after giving 14 days notice (usually on your statement) for any charges incurred the previous month as a result of increasing an unauthorised overdraft. However, for any DD's, SO's etc bounced they will apply an immediate charge which is IN ADDITION to any fees for increasing your overdraft. But here's the killer! They kick you in the bollocks by doing this because the £32 for the privelige of bouncing a DD takes you further overdrawn to another £25 charge is registered! That's £57 to bounce ONE DD. Absurd? I think so!

 

I think that's how it works anyway. It was the only pattern I could see.

 

My bank seem to have given up bouncing DD's now so over recent months I've only been getting charged £125 per month for the privelige of having a bank account. That's actually quite a bargain when you consider that I have been charged up to £450 in some months in the past when things were really tight! Looking through statements you can also see the spiral that gets you into this mess in the first place. Perhaps unsurprisingly the spiral started with just one charge!

 

OC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next hurdle is sending my DPA Cheque for £10. Nobody at HSBC can tell me who this needs making payable to!!! I was going to send it as blank but if anybody has any suggestions...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make it payable to HSBC Plc, and send it recorded delivery to your local branch. It goes without saying that the letter must indicate that this is for a full disclosure under the DPA.

 

Good luck.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My local branch?! I was going to send it to the registered address as per the FAQ which is 8 Canada Square London. I dont suppose it would matter though would it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is best to keep all communications with your local branch. If you don't they will start sending you stuff from all over the country, and responding left, right and centre can become very confusing.

 

This is your claim, and it will be your local branch that you name as defendant. The bank has internal mail processes to ensure that your correspondence reaches the right person.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well the reply from the DPA letter arrived on friday.

 

"You have asked for information about "manual intervention" on your account by which we assume you mean the amount of time spent by staff in administering your account. You should be aware that HSBC's charges are not fixed by reference to the specific amount of staff activity involved in the handling of individual accounts. The level of staff involvement in account management varies from case to case but our charges are set at standard rates, set out in our price list. Changes to these charges are notified to you in accordance with the banking code. By fixing and publishing standard charges, HSBC ensures that customers are fully aware of the charges that will apply to their accounts.

 

In addition, you have asked for copies of notes etc. "manual intervention" on your account, however, HSBC's records are not structured in a way that will enable us to give you a breakdown of the indiviual staff time onvolved in administering your account generally or in relation to any charges identified in the statements which we sent you previously"

 

What do you think then??? Prelim time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your DPA Request was for notes and so on against your accounts, to which you're entitled, and which HSBC subsidiary First Direct send out straight away.

 

I would reply to them stating that you require sight of the notes on your account as entitled under the DPA 1998 and their 40 days expires on . Tell them that their discussion of the amount of staff time involved, and "levels of staff involvement" in each occurrence of a default event, and it's relation to the levels of charges, is utterly irrelevant to your requirement and has, as such, been ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those interested, please find enclosed my edited reply

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 26-May-2006.

The disclosure of personal data is incomplete. You have neither provided notes nor documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

I do not require breakdowns of the amount of time spent or the individual staff involvement in administering my account other than the information detailed on my records.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998, and as such am again enclosing the statutory maximum fee of £10.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

You have a further 29 days to comply.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a matter of interest (no pun intended!)

I was chatting with my mate a couple of days ago, he is claiming from halifax.

He actually got a letter stating that all charges are automatic, and that the only manual intervention is when the charges are refunded!

I know it's Halifax, but I am sure that it is the same for all banks. There will be no records of manual intervention, just as there are none when a member of staff delete a charge (yes, it does happen!)

Best to get them to confirm though, for the sake of the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Next installment ! Having replied back to HSBC explaining their original letter failed to provide details of Manual Intervention, I have now received the following.

 

Futher to our letter dated 2nd June HSBC's records are not structured in a way that will enable us to give you a breakdown of any manual intervention by any member of staff who administers your account. As previously advised charges are not fixed by reference to the specific amount of staff activity involved in the handling of individual accounts.

 

Please be advised there is no further information to which you are entitled under the data protection act 98 which would shed further light on the charges situation and we therefore return your £10

 

However if you wish to discuss your charges further then please contact our service quality team on 08456 028006

 

Is this confirmation that they cannot prove Manual Intervention? Do I pursue the DPA deadline which is this sunday?
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's their response on Manual Intervention; they don't structure their charges by the amount of work done... (therefore their charges cannot be a genuine pre-estimate of costs incurred by YOUR breaches...)

 

I would now move on and forget Data Protection (unless you don't have all your transactional data - I haven't read up, sorry).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

The saga continues. Sent my prelim but no reply. Sendin LBA tomorrow but am interested in the Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT .

Does anybody have any details on this and how I go about it?

Many thanks

Gazuk

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...