Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dencha v Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5635 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

This is my first post on this very inspiring site. So here goes.

 

I have had several letters in recent months from Lowell regarding a Barclaycard debt which was first taken out in the 1980's and of couse the endless phone calls.

 

The last letter recieved "notice of intention to issue county court claim" dated 20/02/07 from Hamptons Legal on behalf of Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd with the usual Court Fees, Solicitors Costs and Interest added on for good measure.

 

Heard nothing since. This is for a debt defaulted in 1992 - 93 and agreed to pay £1.00 per month which as far as I know has been paid every month until stopped by Barclaycard whenever that may have been as I did not notice it being stopped and have not yet found when it was stopped.

 

The first phone call I recieved agreed to pay £5.00 to stop legal proceedings. Apparently this is not the best cause of action I now see.

 

Second call asked for £160.00 per month which reduced to £80.00 per month during the conversation , but was probably the figure they were aiming for anyway. I did not agree to make payments of any kind and have not talked to them on the phone since as the questions were read off parrot fashion and anything I said seemed to be ignored.

 

They also sent a letter in January giving a one off opportunity to clear the debt by paying appx half the amount they said I owed. Missed this one. Suspect it arrived after the cutoff date.

 

Original Creditor is stated as Barclaycard and an account No.

 

The question here is would my first course of action be a CCA to Lowell and SAR to Barclaycard.

 

It never rains but it pours. Today I recieved a letter from Arrow Global Recievables that Paragon Personal Finance have assigned an outstanding balance to them which dates from 1992-3 and I would think a debt originally with Universal Credit. This is all such along time ago it is difficult to remember everything from those days which for me was a totally different life. I do know that I am still paying £5.00 per month from my bank account through the Debt Enforcement Agency as I have done for nearly 14 years for this one.

 

Both have recommended solutions providers they are partnered with.

 

Should I treat this in the same way. CCA etc.

 

Any recommendations and observations would be greatly appreciated.

 

As a matter of interest found CAG doing a search for Lowell Financial. CAG top of the list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok wwell i dont think i need to bah you over the head for giving these guys ANY money at all

they are DCA's THEY HAVE NO POWERS!!

 

you need to findout 'when' you last payment was made on the BCard.

if its more than 6 yrs ago, its statute barred now.

 

however, yep CCA both DCA's, that should stall things.

 

my suggeston would be to also SAR both the original Co's Bcard & ???? [whoever owns them?]

then find out the balances.

 

come back on here when you have the info.

 

might be an idea to search for the two Co.'s and see how others have gotten on too.

 

finally, don't worry!

once you have SAR'ed the 2 Co's then inform the DCA's that the A/C's are in dispute & IF they do not own the debt, nor able to produce CCA results i'd stop paying

but dont do that yet.

 

whatever you do, DON'T talk or make any further arrangements on the telephone.

refuse to talk to them & say you want all comms in writing Only, in all your letters out.

 

good luck

 

dx100uk;)

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to disagree slightly... You need to send the CCA request, here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html#post162367

 

Make sure that it goes by Rec/Del and make sure that you include a PO for £1.

 

Maybe... After they have complied with a CCA request, SAR them but b4 that it's just a waste of £10 !

 

If they can supply a CCA by all means go down the SAR route and get the penalty charges removed! But for now, just the CCA request!

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe, see what you mean dave.

your like me, always helping.

normally assume the poster is wanting to claim back charges also

but in this case noy, so really an sar to the original debtors is unness at this time.

the cca will give the balance, so that should be enough to be going on with.

 

there is an advantage to maybe not sending cca's to the dca at all though?

why not just send sar's to the two original co's, then just inform the dca's that debts are in dispute, they should then back off and refer the debts back?

unless ofcourse they have brought them, then it IS DCA CCA time?

 

god its hot here tonight, have to go down to the basement and turn the boilers off me thinks.

only 10hrs to go though..

 

dx100uk:D

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request sent to Lowell Financial enclosing £1.00

 

Sent Special Delivery Next Day as has extra benifit of recieving name and signature scan available on the web.

 

 

 

 

 

10April 2007

Reference: XXXXXXXX

CONFIDENTIAL

Lowell Financial

Enterprise House

1 Apex View

Leeds

LS11 9BH

Dear Lowell Financial,

Subject: Barclaycard

Consumer Credit Act 1974

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the

following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00, which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act. Cheque No. 100679 should be used only for the purpose of complying with my request and should not be used to credit the alleged account.

 

I understand a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours Sincerely

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request reply from Lowell today

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

11 April, 2007

 

Dear Mr XXXXXX,

 

Our Ref: XXXXXX

Original Creditor: Barclaycard

Balance Outstanding: £XXXXX

 

We are in receipt of your request for a copy of your credit agreement in accordance with section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

We are also in receipt of the prescribed fee from you.

 

We are requesting a copy of the agreement from the original lender with whom you originally entered into the agreement.

 

While we endeavor to reply to you with the required information within the prescribed 12 day period under the Consumer Credit Act, you will appreciate this is dependant upon receipt of the information from the original creditor.

 

We will advise you further if it will take longer than the prescribed period.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Andrew Bartle

 

Chief Operations Officer

 

12 days from today for default. Usual payment methods listed on reverse side of letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Lowell defaulted on the CCA request on 27th April. The same day as they sent out a copy of my application form with a nice letter saying the account is defaulted although I have not yet checked my credit rating.

 

Now waiting on the calender month for an offence to be commited.

 

Letter and application form.

 

30April20074.jpg

 

30April20073.jpg

 

Now Lowell have sent me the alledged CCA fully expect letters and calls to start again. Rest assured I will not be talking to anyone on the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely unexecuted if they want to call it an agreement, you can clearly see the bottom of the word application where it's not been not been scanned straight. Can't see an APR%, the t&c's are unreadable.

 

One for TS's this. :D

 

Have a read of my Lowell/Cap1 thread, more or less the same route to go down though.

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Diskman

 

Looks as though you waited for the offence to occur before you went down the TS route with Cap 1.

 

Had a another close look at the CCA box on the application and looks as though someone has written over the top of whatever is printed there. The copy I have is not much better than the one posted.

 

Dencha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, offence committed and then reported, no comeback that way.

 

I tried everything to lighten those boxes up but to no avail.

 

It's quite clearly not even stamped (other than recieved) let alone signed in execution.

 

Edit: I think the writing that shows through looks like the t&c's on the reverse of the application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have held them up to the light to see if I can make anything out but no, cannot be read.

 

From Maggies thread:

 

With regards to unreadable copies of documents:

 

Under the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983, every copy sent under the Act must be easily legible:

 

Legibility of notices and copy documents and wording of prescribed Forms

 

2.-(1) The lettering in every notice in a Form prescribed by these Regulations and in every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible and of a colour which is readily distinguishable from the colour of the paper.

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave

 

I will keep it in mind if they start hassling.

 

Maggieboo

 

The reason your photobucket pic is small is because you have copied the wrong link.

 

In Photobucket you need to copy the IMG link which is the third one down. You have copied the URL link which is the first one. Hope this helps.

 

Now, I have shown you mine and now you should show me yours.

 

dencha

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use this letter, just replace the information that you need.

Special delivery is guaranteed to arrive whereas recorded delivery is not.

 

CCA request sent to Lowell Financial enclosing £1.00

 

Sent Special Delivery Next Day as has extra benifit of recieving name and signature scan available on the web.

 

 

 

 

 

 

10April 2007

 

Reference: XXXXXXXX

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

Lowell Financial

Enterprise House

1 Apex View

Leeds

LS11 9BH

 

Dear Lowell Financial,

 

Subject: Barclaycard

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the

following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00, which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act. Cheque No. 100679 should be used only for the purpose of complying with my request and should not be used to credit the alleged account.

 

I understand a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours Sincerely

 

 

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

im at the same stage as you with lowell, and have that same default letter, which is a load of rubbish. for me, i was paying instalments of £50 a month until this month and i paid the last one on the 16th of april, the next one isnt due until the middle of this month, yet they have defaulted me and demanded i pay them back on the basis of them sending a dodgy application form. they are scare mongers.

 

good luck.

 

evee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...