Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

evicting unwanted tenant


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Bit of an odd one this. We've just taken over a livery yard (stables and land for horses).

 

We have taken it over from a large land owner (legally) for 5 yrs. The previous 'tenants' sub let - verbally- to an 'individual' which was ok'd by the landlord. The lease for the new tenancy started on the 1st of April, for us. Prior to this the 'individual' knew the tenants were looking for a place of their own to buy and would not be around for much longer, so they served the 'individual' notice to move out. The individual ignored this. Sour grapes as they did not get offered the yard.

Here comes the problem.

The 'individual' who was sub let a couple of stables previously, took their horses off the yard and moved them to another yard some miles away due to personal problems and there they have remained now for some months. They still, however, have some tack which is still on the yard, a few rugs and feed buckets etc. They have known full well that they are not going to return to the yard as they are not welcome due to 'discrepancies' they claimed against the previous tenant. Our new landlords are also aware of these 'discrepancies' claimed and have said to us that we can choose who we have as liveries. Obviously the 'individual' concerned is one we don't want. We have served a 'notice to remove their belongings' by recorded delivery which they ignored, but they did get one we sent by hand. They do not have any contract with us and never will. They have also been given a deadline to remove their items including a horse box, which is now on our land as per the lease.

 

They are refusing to take their things and are under the false illusion they have some right to come back to the yard with thier horses.

Can we remove these items and take them to their home address?

Can we have the horse box towed off and also taken to their home?

 

What other legal rights do we have and any pitfalls we need to look out for?

 

Any advice would be grateful as we are starting a business, legal costs would be an unwanted financial extra.

 

Thanks for your time and patients reading this

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to landlords/tenants forum where you should receive more help and advice.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may come under trespass if they return - as they have vacated the premises. I would write to them and state that unless they remove all property belonging to them within 14 days you will begin charging them for storage. Make it a reasonable charge - something like £5-10 per day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blacksheep 1979.

Thanks for the quick reply. We have already sent a letter asking them to move their belongings, recorded delivery, as did the previous tenant, but because they are known for causing trouble, and have chosen to not sign for the letter. Hence one was hand delivered to the person, which supprised them to which they have now responded to.

 

No inventory of what they still have or ever had there including it's condition was ever made. They knew they were asked to leave by the previous tenant, but played ignorant and avoided going to the yard until the previous tenants had vacated. They even accused the previous tenant of theft of some items when the previous tenant handed the yard over to us, which, coincidentally, happened to be to the value of what they owed in back rent. I have no doubt we may suffer the same kind of treatment which is cause for concern. We do not want to 'inherit' this kind of individual and have since found out, quite a few other yards feel the same of this individual. Gives you a bit of an idea of what kind of person we are dealing with.

 

As far as trespass, we have changed all the locks, with permission of the Landlord and added new chains and padlocks to all the access gates. In fact we've done everything you would expect to do, with permission, just as you would if you moved into a new house.

 

Understandably the Landlord does not want to get too involved and we dont want to have to force them to if we had to.

 

Any futher advice would be most grateful

 

Thanks again

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

A letter will be deemed delivered I believe it is two days after postage so from now on just get proof of postage. I would also maybe talk to the local crime prevention officer, ask about securing the site and get them to note your concerns about the ex-tennants - its always better to be prepared and get the first opinion down which can count for alot.

 

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blacksheep1979Just a quick update. The individual plus a few family members arrived, on time at 10am as stipulated in the letter, and removed the remaining items. No fuss, no problems because they knew they did not have a leg to stand on. As a precaution, the Police were informed of what and when this was taking place, and as an added precaution, the whole 'eviction' was filmed on a camcorder, under cover of a blanket. I hate being brought down to that level, but felt it wise.I have no doubt the individual will try and accuse us of some valuable item that is missing but as the whole yard entrance was clearly recorded, with audio, from start to finish, there is no mention of them querying any missing items, which of course, there would'nt be.Its just a great pitty there are individuals out there that will try and 'screw' you over just because they dont get their own way and stamp their feet in defiance, just like a little kid. Some people are really twisted like that.If you know you are right and on the right side of the law and have checked your rights, which we have done 4 times with different organisations including this one, then stand your ground. It will come right in the end.Thank you and all that have given advise.Kind regardsAndy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...