Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Big Man V Big Bank - Lloyds TSB


Big Man
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

At last found out how to get into Lloyds forum !:smile:

I am arf way through claim with these morons, done all the necessary letters etc, done the MCO bit, Lloyds solictor posted acknowledgement right at last minute on 15 day, dunno how MCO gave em 15 days but thats what it worked out to,

they then sent a defence few days later, now awaiting assigment to a court from MCO.

Read a lot about SCM on here, they seem a right cart load of monkeys, does anybody know why they delay the process so much ? It must cost the bank more in solicitors fees than they save by not paying out earlier! :confused:

Well folks hello to you lovely people in Lloyds forum, lets hope we can kick sum butt, and drag them into a court some where soon. 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

does anybody know why they delay the process so much ?

To frustrate you. The longer it drags on, the more chance there is that people will drop out. Also, they would'nt want it to get out that claiming from them was easy, now would they?;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Big Man I'm at the same stage as u sent off my doc's and was also thinking of adding the increased intrest but apparently can't do that. I'm waiing for court date.

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Big man how far wiv your claim now? I've got a an order from Judge as set out in my thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/19964-foaf26907-llyods.html

 

sending off schedule of charges & interest

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sat patiently waiting for N149/150 from MCOL, but got 2 letters from Poole County Court, giving a court date of 29th June 2007, missed out the

AQ stage and extra allocation fee completley, well chuffed cant wait now.

 

Just one nagging doubt, I do not personnely hold an account wif LTSB, I have raised a claim in my name for my sons account wif them, he is away from home most of the time serving in the Royal Navy and would not be able to dedicate the time to this project, so I agreed to do it for him !

 

I do have access to his account though, as a signatory and for admin purposes in his abscence, also all his bank statements come addressed to me at our home address, he has also filed a letter of full authority to his bank manager, giving me full authority on his account for all matters, financial, legal, and representation in court if necessary.

 

Just hope this is enough and doesnt give LTSB & [problem] a 'get out of jail card'

 

I am well on the way with the court bundle, due in by 4:00pm on 15th June 2007, does anybody know if it is worth sending it in earlier than above date, or should I just wait till nearer the time ?

 

Also is there anything else I should be doing between now and court date ? i.e badgering [problem] or someone ?

 

Thanks everyone for massive help on this site . X :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have that sort of authority of his account i can't see it being a problem at all.

 

Unfortunately badgering SC&M has very little effect and just ends up getting you more and more annoyed. Just stick to the timelines taht you nedd for everything and you will be fine. CAn't see it doing any harm to get the bundle in early - may make them realise that you mean bussiness.

 

Good luck - keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nearly finished my Court Bundle now, got to be in by 15th June 2007, does anybody know the preferred method of presentation to the Court, ie, ring binder, Acco fastener, document folder etc ?

 

My bundle is looking quite good with stacks of relevant info and lots of pages, just want to ensure presentation is right. Fanx in advance. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nearly finished my Court Bundle now, got to be in by 15th June 2007, does anybody know the preferred method of presentation to the Court, ie, ring binder, Acco fastener, document folder etc ?

 

My bundle is looking quite good with stacks of relevant info and lots of pages, just want to ensure presentation is right. Fanx in advance. :)

 

 

Any body got any comments on this please ! would just like a reply from anyone ! Is anybody out there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as its neat, ordered and indexed it really doesn't matter. I always tie two pieces of string around mine.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

Just thought would share this with you, recieved a letter today 4th May, from Customer Service Recovery Centre - Andover as follows:-

 

Dear Big Man

 

Thank you for your letter dated 4th March 2007. I am sorry that you've not been happy with our response so far.

 

I am unable to add to our letter dated 15th February 2007. This is because we have already outlined our position on the points you have raised.

 

We see from our our records that you have already issued a court claim for repayment of these fees and that our solicitors are dealing with this. Apart from explaining our position, there's nothing more I can do to help you at this stage.

 

Thank you once again for taking the time to raise your concerns with us.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Stuart Edwards

 

:p :p :p :-oOh! I just bust a gut laughing

 

 

This is my reply from the LBA letter, lot happened since then, even got my court date, 29th June, and court bundle will go in next week. If this is the best they can do, they dont deserve to be in business.

 

On another tack, I was browsing on the HSBC forum yesterday and found some info on nudging letters, pre court hearing, so I fired one off to SC&M today, a little sarcastic but I think it might hit the spot.

I included a paragraph about abusing the process, re Vivien LLoyd v Lloyds TSB, Bristol Crown Court, and indicating that if they settle at last moment then to expect an application to court for Wasted Costs ! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...