Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Philk23 V Co-op Bank


philk23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I'm claiming against the Co-op. Not for much at the moment, less than £200, because I only went for six years of charges, which is effectively only four because I closed the account two years ago. I'm at the letter before action stage, and although I've tried to follow all the steps set out on this site, I still seem to have messed up a bit, maybe. Let me explain.

 

Briefly, I've sent a request for payment and a letter before action and have had no reply to either, although I got a response to the SAR. I'm worried already - I sent them by normal first class post, via a postbox. I wish now that I'd sent them by registered post, but I didn't think about it at the time. I bet they claim they never got the letters, though, if I make a claim against them at court. Anyone got any ideas on this?

 

Anyway, I'd like to claim back more than six years, as the bulk of my charges were about 7-8 years ago. I closed the account eventually because of their unethical stance of ripping off their customers with charges.

 

Here's the other thing I think I messed up. When I sent my SAR, I enclosed a £10 cheque and requested details of my full banking history with them. They cashed my cheque, but only sent six years of statements, not the full history I requested. At the time, I decided that that was probably the best I was going to get, so I didn't reply to them, and the 40 day period elapsed some weeks ago. What should I do? Should I send another SAR for the other period? Send a letter requesting the missing information that I asked for and giving them another 40 days? Should I send them another tenner? Should I attempt to include the earlier period in my current claim, or start a separate claim for this period? I'm sure that they will take full advantage of any mistakes I make, and I just don't know what to do next. Gaaaa!!!

 

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi as you asked for all your banking history then they have failed, they may claim they dont have any info older than this but this would be their attempt to avoid older charges, off course you still have to get over the arguments of the limitation act if it were to go to court.

 

Send Non-Compliance template that suits.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...