confused re AQ

[rolling stone]

I have filled in AQ for my son section G Other Information. I have several printouts 1. Special Direction for N149

2. Draft Order for Directions devised by Mercantile Courts

3. The Claimant is aware etc. re defendant req stay

4. Defendant withholding evidence re.charges plus similar case

claim numbers

Do I include all this when sending AQ to court. Is it also possible for me to ask judge to consider costs due to time spent gathering evidence 30 hours at least.

I was doing ok until the AQ arrived, dont want to ruing everything now.

[Mad Nick]

Hi, not sure what you mean by 1. & 2. Is it the same as on here : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionnaires.html

FWIW I did that plus 4 (but settling not "withholding evidence") as an attachment to my AQ. Didn't do 3. Judge ignored it and issued ordinary directions. As for costs, not in the AQ - in the phone/letter haggle with Abbey prior to Court. Regards, Mad Nick

[pmahonc]

Rolling stone

i just followed the instructions on the following link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

hope this helps

 

pmahonc

[rolling stone]

thanks mad mick I will do draft order for directions and 4, where do I put (settling not "withholding evidence"). thanks also pmahonc. have already received £400 of a original claim of £900, though this has risen with extra new charges. Abbey said they would give us £500 but only £400 went into account. Money was in account before we had a chance to say whether we wanted it or not. Sent Abbey part settlement letter. My son only had benefit money going into account, only money he had to live on. So most of money he gets back is probably owed to me his mum.

[Mad Nick]

where do I put (settling not "withholding evidence")

I just meant that you shouldn't accuse them of withholding evidence. Word it as "the Claimant is aware that the Defendant in this case has previously settled the following claims prior to Court :

[rolling stone]

Understood Mad Nick. My mistake actual printout does read "the Claimant is aware that the Defendant in this case has previously settled etc."

 

thanks. all this stuff muddles your head after a while.