Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest Charges- A guide


Guest NATTIE
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4642 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:eek: :o Hi Nattie

I have just recieved the 'Notice that Acknowledgement of Service had been Filed' from the court and NatWest are going to defend the claim. Stupid buggers! Anyway onward and upwards. getting a bit nervous now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thomass, Nattie has an n/a which means the username has been deleted. I wrote the charges guide to help people understand the charges that natwest make and to know the mechanisms of them. I felt that if you know how something works you will see when you look at the statements how the charge has been applied and by doing so be able to avoid them in the future. It would also have the effect of understanding to a point the mindset of the beast you are tackling.

I knew i would get one last chance on one of my own threads to answer a question. So thank you for posting and I am genuinely not being sarcastic.

NatWest or rather Cobbetts will defend but they will not win. Keep the chin up you will get something from customer relations unit giving you charges no interest. It is coincidence not stalling/delaying or even mindless delaying tactics. Be positive, Be prepared and follow the advice from this site and ask as many questions as you need. At the root of everthing this site is about is fighting for you rights. Good Luck and I hope someone will tell me when you win.

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just starting looking at my NatWest. ALl is normal until late 2002 where I just get "charges" with no explanation. At first I get a separate £6 (the advantage gold bit) and a £20. Later on it's combined. I cannot work out what it is for.

 

S'okay...worked out it's unarranged borrowing fee now. I was expecting it to be labelled as such like the other charges are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my last post, I am doing NatWest again (first time was for £4052, they paid 2 weeks after my first letter) for only £600+. To my amazement, I had a letter from Mr Higley stating "given the work involved in assessing my claim they should be in a position to respond within 6-7 weeks."

 

Don't make me laugh. 2 weeks to sort out £4052, 6-7 weeks to sort £600+??? Mr Higley, if you are going to lie, make it convincing huh?

 

Anyhow, I have a new account with A&L, which is now in use. I have had a letter from the NW Birmingham Collections Centre saying I got 7 days to resolve my overdraft. Funny that the amount I am claiming will wipe the overdraft out. Where do I stand with them? Do I make an agreement and pay them £50 a month until its all clear? Tell them the account is going to lit and I cant do anything until its clear? Any advise would be great here guys.

 

Obviously this case is gonna go all the way through the courts like my wifes did with BB, but am used to that now, so not too bothered.

 

Should I shut my account down now or wait till paid out?

 

Also forgot to mention that I am on long term sick due to MS and am now on half pay from work.

 

By the way, if this post is in the wrong thread, please advise where to post this. Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Well, I have a thread on Advantage Gold and Unarranged borrowing which has within in charges that can be claimed but i felt an update on what the charges were and what can be claimed. This is a definitive guide.

 

Well the basics of charges is statements and knowing what the charge is for so we have 4 basic charges all claimable.

1) Unarranged Borrowing Fee-- This is when you have an overdraft or not and you go over that. The bank charges through charging periods which last a month and the charge goes out at the end of the month.

2) Unpaid Item- this appears on the statement and is when there is not sufficient funds in the account the previous working day(mon to Friday) to cover either a cheque, a direct debit or standing order to cover the amount going out. The bank "bounces" or does not pay the item and you get charged for it.

3) Card Misuse or Guaranteed Card Payment Fee(gtee card pymt)--This is when an item is paid by switch and goes through the account when the account is over its agreed or unagreed overdraft.

4) Referral Fee-- This is when an item is, rather than bounced is paid which takes the account over an agreed or unagreed overdraft by more than £26. 3 charges maximum a month on that last one.

5) Card Recovery Fee- This is when someone comes round to your house to recover your bank card

 

 

Please do not add more to this as i am adding more to this. but need to start it with explanations first.

 

OMG, do they really come to one's home + collect their card? phew!!!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]if my response has been of help to you, please click on my scales. thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Tigerbond - Welcome on board!

 

You may find it helpful to start a new thread of your own (e.g., tigerbond vs natwest) in the forum. Just scroll down the page and click on the 'new thread' button and enter your details! :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Not sure if this is the best thread to use, as there seem to be quite a few, and it may be that this is addressed elsewhere,

 

but,

 

surely the premium interest charged on un-arranged borrowing should be considered also as a penalty, as I doubt any there are any increased costs, or at least they are theoretical, and cannot be demonstrated by the banks either.

 

PS COuldnt see where/how to start my own thread! sorry.

 

Does any one know the position on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tender, welcome on board!

 

Have a look here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html on how to start a new thread of your own in the nat west/any other forum. Once you have your own thread, you'll be able to get advice and support specific to your own situation.

 

With regards to the interest charges by nat west on unarranged borrowing, I'd recommend you having a look through the threads in the general forum as this is where the 'contractual' interest (as it is known) is discussed. There have been some really interesting discussions going on for quite some time about this now - although only a handful of claimants have successfully managed to get the contractual interest back when they re-claim their charges.

 

Best of luck - hope to see more of you on the forum(s) soon. :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the interest charges by nat west on unarranged borrowing, I'd recommend you having a look through the threads in the general forum as this is where the 'contractual' interest (as it is known) is discussed. There have been some really interesting discussions going on for quite some time about this now - although only a handful of claimants have successfully managed to get the contractual interest back when they re-claim their charges.

 

hedgey06 et al

 

It's late and I might be getting myself in a muddle here but, surely, lots of people have succeeded in reclaiming the 'premium interest charged on unarranged borrowing'?

 

Most of the spreadsheets available via this website make allowance for reclaiming interest - at whatever rate - incurred as a direct result of the bank's unlawful charges.

 

Of course, some people, myself included, are hoping to claim compound interest on top of this. It is this which is altogether more complicated - indeed the consensus is that while Sempra provides a legitimate argument for CI on the basis of unjust enrichment, you are unlikely to get it at the bank's unauthorised rate - and, thus far, relatively few claimants have realised this goal.

 

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
i too am in the process of reclaiming charges, and again NatWest are defending citing bigger charges???

 

Hi windymiller, welcome on board :)

 

The best thing for you to do at the moment is to start a new thread in this forum. Give as much detail as possible about your claim (without giving away too much personal information) and somebody should be able to advise you further.

 

Best of luck :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just taking a look at something that was written almost 2 years ago. Do you think this need to be given a shampoo and set?

This is only my second post of my reincarnation here. I will be updating the guide which is out of date and in point of fact is almost obsolete now, by the end of the week. The new guide is better and less cluttered.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all,

 

Sorry if this has been asked before - newbie here. I am claiming charges back form NatWest and I'm unsure whether to incluse the following on my list:

 

1) OVERDRAFT ARRANGEMENT FEE

 

2) DAY/MONTH A/C XXXXXX (seem to be bi-monthly)

 

I contacted the NW phone helpline but they told me to approach my manager for information on what the latter actually is. Still waiting for her call back. As most of my charges were racked up 4 or more years ago I need to get this in quickly as I understand I can only go back 6 years and each day I lose some more charges to chase!

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) overdraft arrangement fee is business charge for overdraft.(should be yearly)

2) charges for having the account. I will rephrase that, useage charges, ie paying in taking out, etc,etc

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately not, unpaid items fees, YES, Referral Fees YES and maintenance charge YES(not sure you get many of them on a business account).

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a forum for business accounts. I would start a thread there and then those who have business claims can advise as they are slightly different to personal accounts. I will edit this with a link

There you go.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/business-claims-bank-charges/

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well the basics of charges is statements and knowing what the charge is for so we have 4 basic charges all claimable. The fifth one there is on the basis that the other four have caused the problem to arise and therefore they are penalising you more.

 

1) Unarranged Borrowing Fee or Maintenance Charge-- This is when you have an overdraft or not and you go over that. The bank charges through charging periods which last a month and the charge goes out at the end of the month.

2) Unpaid Item/Return Cheque Fee- this appears on the statement and is when there is not sufficient funds in the account the previous working day(mon to Friday) to cover either a cheque, a direct debit or standing order to cover the amount going out. The bank "bounces" or does not pay the item and you get charged for it.

3) Card Misuse or Guaranteed Card Payment Fee(gtee card pymt)--This is when an item is paid by switch and goes through the account when the account is over its agreed or unagreed overdraft.

4) Referral Fee-- This is when an item is, rather than bounced is paid which takes the account over an agreed or unagreed overdraft by more than £26. 3 charges maximum a month on that last one.

5) Card Recovery Fee- This is when someone comes round to your house to recover your bank card

 

 

We have the main charges so what is the amounts i am looking for?

 

1) Unarranged Borrowing/Maintenance Charge

in 2000 it was £14 which then increased to £20 from April 2003 and then £28 from September 2004.

2) Unpaid Items/Return Cheque Fee

In 2000 it was £30 which went up to £38 from March 2005 (for businesses this is currently £35) Edit: From November 2007 max charge per day is £114 or three items.

3) Card Misuse or guaranteed Card Payment Fee-

In 2000 this was £25 and then went up in March 2005 to £35

4) Referral Fees

It was £25 per item(maximum of £75 per month). This changed in September 2004 to £30 per item(maximum of £90 per month).

5) Card Recovery Fee ---£125(not aware if any change to this charge has occurred)

 

 

This is a slightly better, presentation wise of the NatWest charges guide. When i wrote the original it was good but this post is better now ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...