Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Studio Cat Help Please Not Sure How To Go About This


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Thanks for reading, I hope I put this in the right section.

 

I am looking into claiming charges from this cat, I know I can claim for admin charges at £20 a pop but looking through my last years statements there are service charges on everyone ranging from £12 to £6 am I to include these aswell as they are down as charges ?

 

Any help will be gratefully received

Thanks

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure, I ordered items from them and since ordering the items I have had service charges so I am assuming its for statements every month, it just says service charge nothing else on the statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Admin charges for you breaching your contract are fair game, but service charges might not be.

 

I think you really need to find out what those charges were for before you make a claim.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the 'service' charges were effectively punishing you for some kind of breach then yes, you could claim, but if they were for genuinely providing a service then that's a different matter.

 

To be completely sure that you can claim you do need to know why the 'service' charges were made. Hopefully someone else with experience of that company will come along, or maybe you could call them and ask?

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the back of a statement it says as follows:

 

Service Charge

 

This is the charge we make if you decide to pay by monthly installments. It is 2.6% (or 2% if you choose to pay by direct debit) of the balance brought forward from your last statement, together with a pro-rata service charge upon purchases added to your balance on your previous statement for the period between despatch of each item and the data of the previous statemtn. There is a minimum service charge of £1. Further information regarding calculation of service charge as applied to your account is available on request

 

So basically they are punishing me for wanting to pay monthly so in a way they are wrong, its the same thing thats going on with companys like bt at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically it's a form of interest. Was information on this charge sent to you before you entered into the agreement with the catalogue company?

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically it's a form of interest. Was information on this charge sent to you before you entered into the agreement with the catalogue company?

 

The only time I have seen this is just now when I turned over the back of the statement.

 

It must have come on the back of my first ever statement but I have no knowledge of being sent an agreement or signing one with them so it would have only been on my first statement which means I would have had no prior knowledge to that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wanting to sound patronising but I think you need to make sure you've no paperwork from them, or that you didn't complete anything to set up the account. I don't know how this firm operates but how did you establish the account in the first place?

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know that they don't get agreements sign, although they should. I have sent a CCA to them. They put the £1.00 towards my account and have currently gone into default. I have not heard a word from them. I also know they add PPI without people knowing so unless you're on the ball and cancel this very quickly these amounts mount up. If I were you I would send a CCA letter enclosing a £1.00 Postal Order and send it Recorded Delivery. If you haven't got all your statements you could ask for these in your letter. I understand that people have received these without paying the £10.00 for a Subject Access Request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's difficult to be 100% sure without knowing how the credit account was opened and what information you were provided with before opening the account, but if there was no mention whatsoever of the service charges then you could bring a claim for them - claiming they're unfair as you didn't know about them when you entered into the agreement.

 

Is the catalogue for personal use or are you acting as an agent or a bit of both?

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know that they don't get agreements sign, although they should. I have sent a CCA to them. They put the £1.00 towards my account and have currently gone into default. I have not heard a word from them. I also know they add PPI without people knowing so unless you're on the ball and cancel this very quickly these amounts mount up. If I were you I would send a CCA letter enclosing a £1.00 Postal Order and send it Recorded Delivery. If you haven't got all your statements you could ask for these in your letter. I understand that people have received these without paying the £10.00 for a Subject Access Request.

 

I have just phoned them now and they are sending me out a full schedule of charges, they also added the payment protection to my account so will be taking them all the way with this aswell

 

Thanks for everybodys help, I have just found somebody that won their case against them so know I am on the right track

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's difficult to be 100% sure without knowing how the credit account was opened and what information you were provided with before opening the account, but if there was no mention whatsoever of the service charges then you could bring a claim for them - claiming they're unfair as you didn't know about them when you entered into the agreement.

 

Is the catalogue for personal use or are you acting as an agent or a bit of both?

 

Personal use

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wanting to sound patronising but I think you need to make sure you've no paperwork from them, or that you didn't complete anything to set up the account. I don't know how this firm operates but how did you establish the account in the first place?

 

 

I was a victim of ID theft, several of the debts were run up with this company. When the police contacted them the said they do not keep the credit agreements for longer than 48 hours after the credit has been approved. Also as soon as they decided the case was fraud they destroyed any records they had in my name thus eliminating any shred of evidence the police may have had. Police said they have never seen a company operate like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a victim of ID theft, several of the debts were run up with this company. When the police contacted them the said they do not keep the credit agreements for longer than 48 hours after the credit has been approved. Also as soon as they decided the case was fraud they destroyed any records they had in my name thus eliminating any shred of evidence the police may have had. Police said they have never seen a company operate like this.

 

They are disgusting, They should be banned from operating, the amounts of charges etc they put on your account are disgusting and most definately not proportionate to their costs, then to go and do something like this to a person such as yourself is damn right awful as if you wasn't going through enough without them taking away evidence that could have lead to the thiefs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they way they operate is why so many people are finding it easy to reclaim their charges. If you look at other threads on Studio no one has received an agreement and in a couple of instances they just send a blank form, which effectively is just an application form. My bill with them is quite hefty but there are also a number of charges so I must admit I do find it strange that they have not contacted me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found the girl doing it in the end, still fighting with tv licence people as they think I have a 34" flat screen TV with no licence (one of the fraud items) but hey there you go.... Thought that my little bit of knowledge of them may help you.

 

Good Luck:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they way they operate is why so many people are finding it easy to reclaim their charges. If you look at other threads on Studio no one has received an agreement and in a couple of instances they just send a blank form, which effectively is just an application form. My bill with them is quite hefty but there are also a number of charges so I must admit I do find it strange that they have not contacted me.

 

I would send them the 1st letter that you would to the banks, just delete as you would need to then add extra etc to make it your own, send that off to them and see what you get, I am doing it tomorrow morning for my charges will let you know how I get on

 

Also they are sending me out my statements for free

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point to make from the outset is that the admin charges are unfair penalty charges and that the service charges are unenforceable as you weren't aware of them when you entered into the agreement.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help is this the chat for studio the catalogue?

I have been charged so many late payment admine and service charges with these is there any way I can claim any money back?

How do I go about it what is a CCA?

 

Please help they have got me into so much debt.

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turn 82

 

You can go 2 ways about doing it. You can either ring and ask them to send you all your transactions for up to the last 6 years. If they don't agree to do this you can issue a Subject Access Request which is £10.00. Send recorded delivery. A CCA is Consumer Credit Agreement which is a £1.00. They have 12 days from receipt to send you a signed agreement. if they don't do this they are in default and a further 30 days it is a criminal offence which can be reported to OFT. I think others have just rang up for their transactions and they have obliged without charging. You will then need to add up exactly what they have charged you for.

hope this helps. If you go into search and put Studio it will bring up all those making claims or have made claims against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i am also new to the site, if you start your own thread someone will reply to you and help you at all stages of your claim, cag like to take care of us newbies!

A cca is a consumer credit agreement and if the company cant provide it the debt is unenforcable, however if you want to get your money back and dont have all your statments you need to send a sar request, They have template letters on the site if you need them

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...