Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

taking on mbna


camuser
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Sir or Madame

Re. Account number: ****

I am writing to request a fully comprehensive list of all the default charges for late payments and over limit charges I have paid over the last six years.

Please find enclosed a cheque for the maximum statutory charge of £10. If you are unable to provide this data, I will accept a copy of my card statements going back six years. I understand that statements on their own are not covered by the DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998, yet I’m not requesting the statements per se, but the charges, which I’m entitled to by law.

I look forward to your response within 40 working days, as MBNA is obliged to reply under the data protection Act. If not I shall seek remedy from the Information Commissioner.

 

this is the letter I sent to MBNA it worked with the bank charges I got a full list of statements. Will this be enough for MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got this template letter for moneysaving expert before I seen this site. Is the list of charges enough information needed to tackle credit card companys or would i need full statements :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that a full set of statements would be better and the aboce letter should be good enough for them to send you a set.

 

It may be good to read some of the other MBNA posts just to get a feel as to how MBNA act on this type of request.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been reading alot of the threads the last two days, I'm ready for them. First letter posted 27/03 recieved by recorded delivery 28/03 not sit back and wait I suppose

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still response from mbna from SAR. I take it that it is normal to wait full 40 days until a response from them and even then it is a delay tactic, should I phone to remind them that SAR is requested to get Bll rolling a bit faster.:confused: :confused: :confused:

 

if so what is best number to ring all I have 0800 062 062 given this by girl from customer support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if the act says that any requests for information should be responded to within the 40 days or whether banks etc have 40 days to reply and can then argue that if they send a reply on day 40 then they have complied with the terms of the act.

 

Maybe a mod can shed some light on this

  • Haha 1

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still response from mbna from SAR. I take it that it is normal to wait full 40 days until a response from them and even then it is a delay tactic, should I phone to remind them that SAR is requested to get Bll rolling a bit faster.:confused: :confused: :confused:

 

if so what is best number to ring all I have 0800 062 062 given this by girl from customer support.

 

Hi, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but unless you included ID, they will wait the full 40 days then send you a load of useless printouts, a form to fill in and ask you to pay £10. I know, I know.........:rolleyes:

 

They will then expect you to wait a further 40 days. It is shocking but usual practice for MBNA.

 

Don't bother ringing the 0800 call centre idiots. Go straight to the CEO office (number in the stickies). You MUST stick to your timetable. If they haven't complied within 40 days then you need to file an N1 for non-compliance. This will cost you £30.00. They have also started defending for non-compliance, which is absolutely ridiculous.

 

Lets face it, this ID thing is a farce. They don't need your ID to harass you, ask for money you can't afford, send you statements or sell your alleged debt, so why the hell should they need it for SAR? Idiots.

 

Also, send them a CCA for good measure. They are very lax with their paperwork and you might just have an ace in there!

 

Hope this helps!

 

Regards,

 

Corn x:)

  • Haha 1

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if the act says that any requests for information should be responded to within the 40 days or whether banks etc have 40 days to reply and can then argue that if they send a reply on day 40 then they have complied with the terms of the act.

 

Maybe a mod can shed some light on this

 

Hi PP, the act is quite clear. MBNA just use the most astonishing delaying tactics. It is pathetic really. They have 40 days from receipt of your SAR. They just reply within 40 days and try and twist the law by saying that you have to provide ID (see my post above) and then try and tell you they have another 40 days. They DON'T!!!!! It is absolute poppycock!!!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cornucopia

 

I have no intention of sending ID to them, if 40 days is up then striaght in with non compliance not to sure about this CCA. What is it. I have been with CCCS for about 2 years all creditors stop interest as I was making regular payments most of debt gone. MBNA waied until I got below my credit limit then started charging interest again at 29.9% thus making my regular payment through CCCS their minumum payment which is their interest charges now debt with them at stand still going nowhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA is a Consumer Credit Agreement. Under S78 of the Consumer Credit Act, you can request a copy of your originally executed agreement for £1. MBNA are notoriously lax with this, and if they either cannot supply agreement (they may send you a copy of your application form) or the agreement is not properly executed (i.e., does not contain terms prescribed within the Act) then the debt may not be enforceable.

They have 12 working days to supply this and if after a further calendar month, they still have not complied, then they have committed an offence.

I would certainly recommend sending off a CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA is a Consumer Credit Agreement. Under S78 of the Consumer Credit Act, you can request a copy of your originally executed agreement for £1. MBNA are notoriously lax with this, and if they either cannot supply agreement (they may send you a copy of your application form) or the agreement is not properly executed (i.e., does not contain terms prescribed within the Act) then the debt may not be enforceable.

They have 12 working days to supply this and if after a further calendar month, they still have not complied, then they have committed an offence.

I would certainly recommend sending off a CCA request.

 

So would I! If only to keep the manufacturers of pritt stick, play scissors and sticky back plastic in business!!!:grin::grin::grin:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read about various delaying tactics used by the major banks but what MBNA do seems to be the worst.

 

I assume the answer to this is yes but have they been reported to the authorities?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah well, if you've got about a year to spare, and like the feeling of hitting your head against a brick wall then do, by all means, complain.

 

On a slightly more serious note, a mass complaint to the FSA(or was it FOS - one of them anyway) regarding MBNA was submitted recently via this site.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody in similar position, advice needed,

 

Thanks CAM

 

Hi Cam, as the account is in dispute, they are not allowed to carry out any sort of enforcement action until they comply with your CCA. This doesn't, however, mean that they won't as many of us have discovered. You need to hang on tight until your 12+30 days are up. You could, in the meantime, continue to quote the parts of the acts they are not complying with if they continue to harass you.

 

Regards,

 

Corn x:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry been away for a bit.

Just to keep you's updated, sent CCA on 13 April.

 

emailed gareth.tunnicliffe to remind him of 40 day limit soon aproaching for SAR. no response

Phoned COE got a nice lady :confused: :confused: :confused: who confired SAR request was recieved and would soon be processed. Did not mention CCA to her as I did not want to remind them.

 

Keep the struggle going.8-)

 

Cam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading some more threads and it appears that this ID request from MBNA for SAR is a bid issue. I have not sent ID nor did I intead to. Has anyone recieved SAR without ID? It's not rquired by law is it? My intention was to ignore ID request and issue N1 is this correct or is it giving them more stalling time?

 

 

Cam

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 days up tomorrow for CCA request still no response and no response for SAR. What is next step in CCA request write and inform them of their default on not sending CCA or wait 30 days.

 

After 30 days then what? do you contact police for criminal offence has anyone got to this stage.:? :? :?

 

CAm

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 days up tomorrow for CCA request still no response and no response for S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). What is next step in CCA request write and inform them of their default on not sending CCA or wait 30 days.

 

After 30 days then what? do you contact police for criminal offense has anyone got to this stage.:? :? :?

 

CAm

 

Hi I have been advised that after the 12+30 days they cannot enforce the debt. I am checking what they would have to do to allow them to start enforcement again, IE take you to court or just find agreement etc.

 

good luck dpick:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...