Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell chasing a T mobile bill - not even sure if it's mine ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6159 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

 

Title says it all really - received a letter this morning from Lowell chasing above for £152. Not alot of money compared to some of the credit card bills i've settled with them.

 

But I don't want to pay if it's not mine.

Theres nothing appearing on my experian report for this bill.

 

Whats the process here ?

Do I CCA them ?

Is there something else I should ask them ?

 

All advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes CCA request straight away send it recorded delivery.

Im dealing with them at the moment for a capital one c/card they are an absolute knightmare keep an eye on your credit report because they will probably put something on it. They have on mine ive now got a default from them and am having to argue it out with equifax to get it removed.

This DCA seem to act above the law all the time search the threads for Lowell and there are loads of posts about them.

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marson,

 

Many thanks will CCA them tomorrow.

Can they put something on my credit report ? - i'm thinkinging this is a really old debt and has dropped off cos it's over 6 years old ?.... can they put it back on ?

 

For what it's worth I arranged F&F settlements with Lowell (Before I discovered this site !) and they settled for less than 25p in the pound on £6000 worth of debt... so however bad they are, they are flexible on F&F settlements if you push them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its over 6 years old and its been 6 years since you paid anything to it or acknowledged it then its statute barred and they cant get any money anyway!

 

when was the last time you paid anything to Tmobile RE this bill?

 

or acknowledged the debt?

 

if your 100% sure its over 6 years then send them the statute barred letter if not then send them the CCA.

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I CCA'd them because I couldnt remeber if it was over 6 years old.

 

Got a letter back today saying:-

"The agreement which you seek is not regulated by a consumer credit agreement & is not governed by the above act. Our client there fore has no obligation to supply the information requested by you"

 

Whats my next step - it's not a huge amount of money, but it's becoming very personal with these DCA's :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as l recall from reading another thread that is a load of b***s but lm sure someone more knowledgeable will come along and clarify the position personally l would just let the 12 days pass and then the month let them dig their own hole!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobile contracts dont fall under the CCA, but theres got to be something you can do

 

anyone?

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd SAR them, get ALL the information they hold on you, this will give you 40 days to consider your options, they technically can't chase the debt whilst it's in dispute.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Matt

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely - Lord Acton.

 

Advice offered by MattyH is without predjudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt. Please research any information I have offered, as I will not be held liable for any incorrect advice i've given you.

 

<--------- If my advice has helped, please tip my scales. 8)

 

For Further advice come into the Chat Room: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/chat/flashchat.php

FAQ's : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

Step By Step Instructions ; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not heard anymore from them at moment - but i've got a sneaky feeling they will be in touch soon....

 

Can anyone else who's dealt with old mobile bills - shed any light on this please.

 

Surely if it's not on my credit report - it's either not mine, or over 6 years old ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just had another chaser in giving me 7 days to pay or else they will proceed with legal action (for £137 !).

 

Part of me thinks sod it just cut a deal & put it to bed - but I don't even know if it's my debt !!

 

Can anyone shed any light on what I should do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Woolny

 

I am having a similar problem with red debt collection services for a T-mobile account. I have just written another letter to them informing them that I do not acknowledge the debt and that they must provide me with proof that I owe this debt. I also stated that to my knowledge I have never entered into any sort of contract with any mobile service provider.

 

Red also sent me a postcard claiming that they had visited whilst I was out and I was to call them urgently. There was no company details just a telephone number and a reference number (which just happens to be the same reference number on their letters). So I have added in my letter that they are in breach of the OFT guidelines by failing to provide company details and trying to mislead me by suggesting that a home visit had taken place.

 

Just waiting to see what they send back. As far as I am concerned it is down to them to prove this debt is mine, not me to prove it isn't.

 

Lan

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi woolney

 

I got a reply back last week saying that they were contacting T-mobile for copies of statements and they will contact me at a later date. Just waiting to see what they can produce.

 

Lan

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may find the following letter useful as well if you decide to dispute it ie they can't produce evidence it's your debt:

 

(Your home address)

_________________

_________________

Date: ____________

To: ______________

__________________

Dear Sir/Madam

Account no:

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

I/we look forward to your reply.

Yours faithfully

(Your signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have now had a letter from HAMPTONS LEGAL dated 25th May (only received today) - giving me 7 days to pay or they "MAY" proceed with County Court action...

 

They have asked me to contact them but there phone number is not on paperwork !

 

Should I be concerned about county court if they can't even prove the debt yet ? - am I right in thinking that if it does go to County court I could always pay it to avoid a judgement ?

 

Need soem advice whether to sit tight or contact them etc,

Link to post
Share on other sites

if youve requested the CCA and they havent provided it you could petition any court to stop hamptons actions as non compliance with CCA is a full defence.

 

if you want - send them this letter.

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for your letter of xxxx the contents of which are noted.

 

To date however, you have failed to comply with my legal request for a properly executed Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act, 1974).

 

Since your failure to comply with this request represents a complete defence in any court claim that may be issued at this time, please take note that any action that you decide to take will be vigorously defended.

Please find copies of all my correspondence for ease of reference (best to include)

 

Yours sincerely,

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I had the problem of getting a letter from Lowell about a T-Mobile account from September 2002 for £485. I CCA'd lowell and got the same reply (I rang trading standards and asked if they would have to provide a credit agreement and they said not all mobile phone contracts are covered). I wasn't sure this was even my bill, I explained that to Lowell who took no notice. So I rang t-mobile customer service and explained to them. Because I was unsure if it was my bill they asked me to do a disclaimer over the phone and said they would then pass it onto the fraud department for investigtion. I was told it would take 10 days (this was mid april).

 

I was told while this happened I would get no letters from Lowell. I still got letters from Lowell and eventually Red Debt, so I emailed Lowell after getting nowhere on the phone and told them in the nicest possible way to buzz off. A few days later I got another letter from Lowell saying they were investigating my complaint. That was it...... Until yesterday. I got a letter from t-mobile, at last, explaining that they were extremely sorry about the letters I had been receiving and the account was now cancelled because they believe it was set up Fraudulantly.

 

So my advice would be not to contact Lowell, they are useless, go straight to t-mobile and sort it that way, the worst that can happen is they decide it is your account and they will provide you with proof of that, or of course, they may not be able to prove it and you can use the lowell letters as bog roll!

Link to post
Share on other sites

make sure you keep that letter from T MOBILE!

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...