Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Women-only co-working spaces are part of the new hybrid working landscape, but they divide opinion.View the full article
    • The music streaming service reports record profits of over €1bn (£860m) after laying off 1500 staff.View the full article
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Compensation


judi3
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have claimed my charges back and it paid off a loan taken out due to the

charges this happened when trying to expand a company we specifically asked for a sblgs finance but was forced into a loan and sneaky ppi ,

i have raised a complaint with the fos

The compensation disclosed on the fos site is very vague and the amounts poultry to my distress ,

but the actions of the banks compromised the future of the biz and i would like compensation

but how

Do i work out how much and has any one been successful

 

I m prepared to take it past the small claims court and would love to be a test case but i need advice on where to start.

 

 

 

PLEASE ANY ADVICE OR DEBATE ON THIS SUBJECT .

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would appear that is already much in debate read Reddeath post - its very interesting and has generated some very interesting debate a lot of it pertains to CI however some of it discuses compensation ( although not in that term ) for upset / emotional , financial etc...

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Judi,

I am looking into claiming compensation back, but it does not seem an easy task. You need to be able to quantify the damages and that can be well, quite challenging.

My idea is to compare my pattern of bank charges against my credit report to try and find some trends. At present I have been thinking too much about CI to be able to do this properly, but I have but my bank charges in a spreadsheet and looked at them on a month on month basis for the last 5 years. It does make some interesting reading. I would also like to compare the percentage of charges against what my wages were at the time.

 

Also when I was overdrawn the bank would tell me I could extend my o/d only to have that declined. Then they would offer me a loan, and have that declined as well making me to go to sub-prime lenders with higher interest rates and so on.

 

I would like to see if there are any patterns emerging. i.e. high bank charge and opening of a loan, however this may take some time and effort and I am not so convinced that I can raise a valid arguement. Well, let me re-phrase that, I can prove the financial difficulty they put me under, but quantifying it is challenging.

 

So...just a few thoughts. Don't jump into it head first. It is easy to get carried away by emotions (i know). My feelings at the moment are that this is very difficult and maybe not worth it.

 

Drop by me thread and have a read. Butterfly...stop by and say hi.

 

As for the ppi you should be able to claim this one back as it appears to have been missold, and you can claim back interest on it.

 

As for taking this further if you end up outside a fast track then you are liable for charges which can run into thousands. Think long and hard about it. I am.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice and its something to get my teeth in and explore ALL possibilities

 

 

 

 

good luck reddeath with the crappi lloyds my fingers are crossed for you .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I was having a think about this one on my way in to work today.

As the sum is quite low you would not incurr costs if you lost, so you might as well go for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the sum is quite low you would not incurr costs if you lost, so you might as well go for it.

 

 

Thank you .

 

i was except from court fees for my charges .

 

What is the max figure to be applicable for no incurr costs

and if it gets to fast track are the costs if i lost telephone numbers ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I belive the limit for fast track cases are £5000.

Not sure what you mean by "lost telephone numbers"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind the £750 limit only relates to the advocate's trial/preparation costs, there's also a possible further £250 trial costs if the winning party's legal representative is in court and the court thinks it's reasonable that that representative can attend.

 

In the fast track the other costs are assessed on a summary basis but aren't capped in the same way, so there could well be other costs to pay on top of the trial costs.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...