Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Toptotty vs Lloyds TSB


toptotty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having previously sent off my DPA request for charge details, I have recently received them and sent off my preliminary letter ( 29/03/06 ).

 

HOWEVER :)

 

I had used the template from MSE and had included the 8% interest, I understand im not entitled to it but I have now decided to follow the guides on this website.

 

Do I need to do anything different?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adjust the amount that you are claiming for when you send your LBA to remove the interest until you file at court.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
LBA Sent Today, double checked all my figures again! and used the complex spreadsheet even though im not claiming interest it looked nicer :) now another 14 days :)

 

Now thats a first! The complex spreadsheet 'looks nicer'! Well done you for working it out.

 

Good luck:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi again Toptotty

 

I'd recommend using N1 hard copy to file your claim. You can download the form and see the guides on completion here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

As you enjoyed the spreadsheets so much, this will be a doddle!

 

MCOL is OK for basic straightforward claims, but you have restricted space and it can feel a bit daunting for first timers. With N1, you can perfect the form then just send it to your local court....much more 'satisfying' :)

Remember to attach the spreadsheets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Response as usual just a few questions :) i dont want to get this wrong,

 

From the top downwards let me know if i've got any section wrong please:

 

in the "My county court" : Leicester County Court?

 

in the "Claimant section" Filll in my Name and address, or just name

 

In the "Defendant Section"

Lloyds TSB Plc

25 Gresham Street

London

EC2V 7HN

 

In the "brief details of claim" box:

Money claim for return of penalty charges applied to the Claimants bank account by the Defendant.

 

In the "Value" box

 

Charges £xxxx.xx

Interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 £xxxx.xx

Court Fee £xxx.xx

 

TOTAL £ xxxx,xx

 

Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £x.xx per day OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

 

Below that to the left, "Defendant name and address" my details again :)

 

Below to the right,

 

"Amount claimed" : is that the amount includng 8% s.69 act interest?

"Court fee" : relevant fee.

Solicitors costs L: nothing put in could i put for my time or is it not worth it?

"total amount" : total amount inc court fee and solicitors.

 

Human rights act : No

 

POC : pasted from here :)

 

Full name: me :)

name of claimants solicitor's firm: n/a

 

sign :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoops looked at claimant and defendant so much i see claimant everywhere thanks for your help it is appreciated.

 

one quick query

 

 

"Amount claimed" : is that the amount includng 8% s.69 act interest?

"Court fee" : relevant fee.

Solicitors costs L: nothing put in could i put for my time or is it not worth it?

"total amount" : total amount inc court fee and solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoops looked at claimant and defendant so much i see claimant everywhere thanks for your help it is appreciated.

 

one quick query

 

 

"Amount claimed" : is that the amount includng 8% s.69 act interest?

"Court fee" : relevant fee.

Solicitors costs L: nothing put in could i put for my time or is it not worth it?

"total amount" : total amount inc court fee and solicitors.

 

Yes that is fine - don't put in any claim for your time at this stage

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/65921-application-costs.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just a quick update :)

 

Notice of claim received:

 

Issuesd 15th May

Sent by first class post on 17th May

Deemed served on 19th may

Lloyds has until 4th June to reply

 

Thats it for now, just wait for their next move

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Small question

 

In Section D of N150

 

Amount of Claim

 

What amount of the claim is in dispute?

 

From The AQ Guide completion notes: Enter the total value of your claim in the space provided - This should include all interest but not costs.

 

I have read elsewhere on this forum that the amount of claim should not include interest.

 

I am not claiming CI just SI

 

Could anyone clear this up

 

thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...