Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
    • FTMDave - your cold light of day suspicions are correct, alas. Just had this back... Thank you for your email. I was very sorry to learn that you recently received a parking charge notice after shopping at our Kearsley Manchester Rd Express store. I appreciate this is always frustrating, especially as you'd just nipped in for the one item. I've had a look, and I can confirm that in this case the car park at this store is entirely owned by a third party - it is not owned or operated by Tesco in any way. The parking charge issued is on behalf of that third party, although I appreciate it does state Tesco on the letter. Regrettably as the car park is owned and operated by a separate company we don't have any form of influence or control over the parking charges issued. In this case, I can only recommend that you follow the appeals process outlined on the letter directly to take the matter up with UKPPO directly. I'm sorry that I cannot offer further help in this case.  Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you require anything further.  Kind regards Ewan Kelly Customer Service Specialist On behalf of the Chief Executive’s Office
    • The IMF estimates Russia's economy will grow faster than the likes of the US, UK and Germany this year.View the full article
    • Ye thats fine. They should come back before the date of your defence BUT   IN ANY CASE YOU MUST FILE YOUR DEFENCE. DO NOT AWAIT THE PAPERWORK PAST YOUR FILING DATE.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Badgerman V Lloyds


Badgerman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Just starting my journey to reclaim my money from Lloyds TSB on 2 closed accounts.

 

I have statements for both accounts going back 6 years & have calculated charges totaling £1300 :shock:. I've downloaded the preliminary letter & the excel spreadsheet outling each charge but I want to make sure I get this absolutely correct. There are 2 columns within the summary of charges spreadsheet. The first is "date incurred" the second is "days since offence".

 

Now the date the charge was actually incurred I.E taken from my account is obviously different to the date when the actual offence was commited. E.G direct debit returned 12th Aug 2002 with the £30 charge for this offence not taken until 1st Oct 2002. When filling in the spreadsheet do I put the date incurred as 12th Aug or 1st Oct? Similarly in the column for days since offence do I put the 12th Aug or 1st Oct?

 

Hope you can help......I hate Lloyds with a passion for all the worry & concern they caused me in the past (1 charge is for £210 for returned DD's totaling £22:evil: ) & I finally feel that I am able to do something about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & Welcome!:)

If the charge came out of your bank on the 1st October, I would put that date.

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html I WON!!!!:D :D

If I have helped, please click my scales:)

  • Haha 1

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

So I've sent my preliminary along with my charges spreadsheet & received back the following:

 

thankyou for getting in touch with us. iam sorry your unhappy about your account charges

 

like any business, we do make a charge for some of our extraservices. when customers dont have enough in their accounts to cover a payement, this always means extra work-and it has to happen very wuickly. we have to agree to make payement by setting up or increasing an overdraft,or rell cuctomers we cant agree it. we feel it's fair to charge for this service.

 

of course it's only fair to that we are completely open about any charged for services before you might need them. thats we take care to give every new customer the latest guide yo our charges.you can also get up-to-date detailsabout fees and borrowing rates at all our branches, through our helpine and on our website.

 

just as importantly, we do everthing we can to help our customers avoid these charges.you can gat an up-to-date ballance at any of our cash machines, over the phone on line and by weekly text to your mobile.

 

if you know a payementis going to take you over your agreed limit you're welcome to see if there is anything we can do

 

the office of fair trading has published new guide lines on credit card default charges. we're still talking it through with them, but the important point is that the guildlines are about 'default' charges that people pay when they break an agreement with us. this doesn't apply to your charges as these were for dealing with your request to go over your agreed overdraft limit. they are not default charges because you have not briken your agreement. they are our prices for the service we provide in these situations.

 

i understand that you may also have concerns about us sharing infomation about your relationship with us with the credit reference agencies bla bla bla bla

 

i do hope you can see that we make our charging system as fair as possible- and why i cant agree to cancel your charges

 

i hope this fully answers the points you raised with us. please let me know if there is anything else i can do to help. if we cannot some to an agreement. i will provide you with details of the financial ombundsman service so they can consider your complaint independently.

 

if you are happy with the way i have dealy with your complaint there is no need for you to reply to my letter. if i have not heard from you by 26 june 2007 i will close my file, though of course i will re-open it should you came back at any point afterwards

 

yours ****** ********

 

From reading through others people threads this seems to be a standard response. My question is should I just proceed with the standard LBA or should I be looking at something else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

Something interesting has happened but before I explain let me re-cap for you.

 

Between my wife & I we held 3 accounts with Lloyds, 1 joint account & each of us had seperate sole accounts. I've started action to claim back £1055 on just one of these accounts namely our joint account with a view to going down the same route with our sole accounts depending on the outcome of this first claim.

 

Yesterday my wife & I received 3 letters from Lloyds. One addressed to me, one to my wife & the other to us both. Each letter was offering us different sums as full & final settlement totalling £1282.50 - £227.50 more than the £1055 that I'm claiming. On the face of it this seems very generous of Lloyds offering us £227.50 extra presumably as compensation for the worry they caused us:rolleyes:

 

If we accept these offers in relation to our claim against our joint account will this mean that we cannot then start seperate claims for our sole accounts:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As long as you don't sign anything saying that you can't claim again. How come they sent 3 separate letters? You were just claiming on your joint account not the sole accounts??:confused:

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why they've sent 3 letters....strange isn't it:confused:

 

I've not mentioned either of our sole accounts in our correspondence with Lloyds & neither have they in their letters back. I think I'll just accept what they've offered in relation to the joint account & start proceedings on our sole accounts once the freeze is over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi, it's been some time since I was last here but the advice given enabled me to get over £1200 back from Lloyds & thanks to all for your assistance & advise.

 

What is the situation regarding the outcome of the OFT case? As suggested by Barty I got my next claim in on my sole account PDQ & received Lloyds response back to my preliminary stating along the lines that they'd received my complaint but were waiting for an outcome to this test case.....what's the advise? Should I simply be waiting for a further response from Lloyds or firing in an LBA? Or, as it's been nearly 10 months, should I be re-sending a preliminary to re-start my claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without going into any detail regarding the OFT v Banks test case, it is business as usual, providing you have issued a Prelim and LBA then issue you claim form.

 

There are new templates in the library now adapted following the test case:

templates library

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...