Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

wobs v Yorkshire Bank ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

received leter from yorkshire bank this morning in reply to SAR

 

they say they have received my request for bank statements and can provide these

 

however the letter then goes onto say

"with regard to your request for information relating to manual intervention on your account, there is no specific mention of manual intervention within the data protection act and as such we are under no statutory obligation to record or provide this information"

 

Is this right?

sorry if this has already been asked

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

received another letter from yorkshire bank this moring asking me to ring Michelle Woodward in my local branch, after ringing the number for the local branch and being directed to the call center I went into the branch to speak to Michelle Woodward, she said they could not provide statements for my personal loan account or mortgage account, I politley reminded her that they ahev to keep my details for 6 years and i know the accounts were not closed until 2004, she made a phone call to head office, she then went on to say they would provide a list of charges as the accounts were with collections. the accounts cant be with collections because they were paid off in full in 2004. however i was convinced at the time they were paid off in full that the mortgage was overpaid by approx £1500. if I could get the statements i think the final payment would show the overpayment.

 

Can I demand the statements?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michelle has just rang me back again. she is now saying that the mortgage and personal loan were never with collections, I told her they must have been at some point because the personal loan ended up as a CCj and the mortgage I had to attend court to stop a repossession.

 

am I imagining thinks or is this just a stalling attempt.

 

she now wants me to send the paparwork for the CCJ and mortage repossession into the branch.

 

Shall I just send photo copies ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

been on the royal mail website trying to track the letter and photo copies, its telling me no information available yet.

 

Shall I ring the bank to check they have received them, still no sign of any statements and the 40 days are nearly up

9 days left and counting

Link to post
Share on other sites

recieved another letter this morning from my local branch dated 23rd feb 07 asking me to contact michelle again.

 

The 40 days for the SAR runs out tomorrow.

 

I have the letter ready to give them an extra 7 days before I issue court proceedings for the SAR.

 

Im going to ring the branch first thing monday morning and if they have not got the information ready I will hand deliver my letter to the branch straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 40 day sar request ran out yesterday for yorkshire bank they had wrote to me asking me to contact local branch letter arrivede saturday morning, I rang them this morning and the lady who I spoke to said they cant find any details from my current account and also I the SAR does not cover my old mortgage account and an old personal loan account, I poltely informed her that the SAR covered every type of account I have ever had with them, she said she would get in touch with head office and tell them.

I ahd to take prove that all acounts existed into the bank, so I popped in the letter from the templated reminding them the 40 days is up and I am giving them a further 7 days.

 

Is this just usual yorkshire bak stalling techniques?

 

Am I right in sending the letter ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this the letter before action giving warning that you will take them to court for non-compliance with the SAR. If so, I'd say you are spot on. I am very interested in this as I will be sending YB a second SAR any day now, as in my original I only asked about my current account, but I also had 2 loans and a credit card that I will be after, and I have no account numbers, so I won't be surprised if I have a problem. I'm not sure why they wanted proof that you are who you say you are. Unless you've moved or changed name I imagine they've happily been sending correspondence to you. Yes this is pretty typical. Don't let them worry you.

 

I've merged this with your main YB thread as it it is all part of your progress and makes it easier to follow

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, I think you should get a copy of your credit file from all the credit reference agencies. I imagine you were defaulted on the mortgage, and if this was made up entirely of charges you should try to get it removed. It is hard to get this done, but easier if done at the same time as charges.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance Caro.

 

Already checked cerdit reports, the strange thing is the old yorkshire bank mortgage doesnt show up at all on any credit reports the personall loan is showing up as a CCJ and the current account is showing as a CCJ both of which are satisfied.

The Yorkshire bank again yesterday tried telling me the SAR does not cover the old mortgage or old personal loan, I politely informed them yet again that the SAR coevrs all information they have about me

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops forgot to say in last post ive not moved or changed my name.

 

They were trying to say they had no records of me at all if thats the case surley they had to remove the CCJs and defaults on my credit files?

Link to post
Share on other sites

quick update still no SAR information and no further correspondance at all from yorkshire bank.

 

Should I just issue the court proceedings on tuesday morning ( original SAR sent 15th Jan) LBA for SAR handed to woman in yorkshire bank on 26th Feb so If I start court proceedings on Tuesday morning they will have had 49 days and still not complied or should i do it monday (they will have still had 48 days)

is there any templates for court proceeding for SAR anywhere ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should give them 7 full days, as you might find they will suddenly become more focussed and comply without the need to resort to this. You should find the information for the SAR compliance court claim in the Bank Templates Library if you need it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caro

 

Thanks once again for the help. will start it on tuesday then.

 

Recieved this letter today when the post man came at 2-30pm.

 

01/03/07

 

Dear Mr & Mrs Wobbles

 

RE: Data Protection Act 1998 - Data Subject Access Request

 

I refer to our previous correspondance acknowledging reciept of your request for details of charges and/or statements relating to your bank account(s)

 

Within the terms of the Data Protection Act 1998 we have 40 days in which to provide you with the information we hold. The end of this time period has been reached, however, due to the high volume of requests we have received in relation to this high profile issue, I regret that we are not yet able to provide you with the information requested.

 

Whilst you are within your rights to refer the matter to the Information Commisioner at the end of the 40 day period, I confirm that we shall provide you with the information as soon as we possibly can.

 

I thank you for your continued patience and understanding in this matter.

 

Yours sincerely

 

T.C Rayner

 

Advice Quality Unit-Charges Section

 

am I right in thinking this is just another stalling technique?

 

Should I just go ahead with the court proceedings for the SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you ring the ICO Monday and seek their view on this letter.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This really is very funny stuff when you understand the complete lack of compassion the the relentless and bullying attitude exhibited by this bank in respect of its customers and their legitimate claims.

Part of the backlog they are experiencing is due to the fact that they are investing so many of their resources on trying to frustrate their customers and clogging up the courts that they are unable to allocate any more to the proper provision of customer services.

I hope that they are reading this post. Here is my suggestion.

 

Do not phone the ICO. Make an immediate formal complaint of non-compliance. Send this off on Monday recorded delivery.

 

The bank is a little more tricky because their letter is politely worded and on the face of it reasonable enough. A court might feel that you are being a bit pushy in not helping them a little.

 

Write to the bank very politely.

 

Thanks them for their letter and tell them that you understand that they must be receiving lots of these requests at he moment. However, they have to realise that this is a situation of their own making as it is their unlawful charges and their policy of non-cooperation with claimants which is causing the problem.

 

Point out to them that the DPA has been prompted by the Human Rights Act and by the Convention on Human Rights itself. As such they have an overwhelming duty to place requests for disclosure at a very high level of priority.

You are especially concerned that their letter makes no suggestion as to when your request will be dealt with.

 

In view of their large resources as an important British financial institution, in view of their untrustworthy record both in applying unlawful charges and also in obstructing the legitimate claims of their customers, you are not prepared to accept their open-ended promise to deal with your statutory demand and if you do not receive full disclosure within 5 days you will begin a County Court claim for non-compliance and without any further notice.

 

 

Like all these things, only make this threat if you intend to proceed with it.

It will cost you £150 but you will get your money back. You have their letter of admission and it is an unlosable case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice BankFodder. I like your style.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...