Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hi everybody, info re closed accounts.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6234 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

New here, first post, hello all and all that type of stuff.

 

Anyway down to the bones of it.

 

I closed an account at the turn of the year before I was aware of the possibilities of re-claiming the extortionate ammounts of cash the bank had taken off me over the years.

 

What I would like to know is this, does the fact that the account is closed hold any bearing on my ability to claim back the unlawful charges the bank made against me whilst the account was running?

 

Cheers in advance for all and any help/information forthcoming.

 

Rutilus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rutilus,

 

The fact the account is closed will not stop you claiming any charges incurred in the last 6 years. I claimed against Abbey for an account closed 18 months ago.

 

If you have account numbers etc request your statements and start the process.

 

And welcome aboard.

 

There is a lot of information on this site so take your time and spend a couple of days reading as much as you can.

 

Here are a couple of links to get you started and i suggest you always keep them to hand.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/24031-frequently-asked-questions.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

 

When you are comfortable start a thread "XXXX v Bank Name here" in the relavent bank forum as then people with specific experience of this bank can offer support and advice.

 

There is a lot of information to take in here so if unsure it is allways best to Ask first.

 

If you need a quick answer to a question you could always try the chatroom as there are usually some very helpful people in there.

 

Very best of luck

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers BB, I appreciate the swift response.

 

If its not to cheeky could you indulge me further with one more question?

 

Many of my colleagues who are considering entering the process talk of the charges incurred for letters sent to them. The majority of my charges simply appeared on statements as 'unarranged borrowing fees.'

 

Have the bank bamboozled me here? Or am I still entitled to claim these fees back because at the end of the day they were fees incurred when my account went a few pence overdrawn, and usually ammounted to 20 pounds plus.

 

In effect they were making these charges while incurring no cost to themselves because the statements would be sent to me anyway as a matter of course. In effect they had utilised the ultimate revenue stream, extra cash in for zero outlay.

 

Sorry to be a pain but these are the burning questions.

 

Anyhoo, I'm off to peruse the site in more detail now, and thanks for the links, I'm sure they will be most helpful.

 

Cheers again.

 

Rutilus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Rutilus,

 

They sound like charges to me rather than fees, fees would imply that these are agreed by all parties which I doubt is the case.

 

This entire process is based on the fact the bank are making unlawfull profits from their charging practices so, as a rule of thumb it is best to assume that your claim will go to court and with and it will be the banks responsability to defend these charges before a judge. Include the "unauthorised Borrowig Fees" and let them defend.

 

They have not as yet stepped into the courtroom but will make you go through the process of preparing for it.

 

Very best of luck,

 

It is best to read as much as you can, ask any questions and people will point you in the right direction.

 

Cheers

 

BB

Any advise offered is my own opinion, and if in doubt, always seek clarification.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...