Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No Credit Credit Agreement supplied?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry - being dim here I think. But what happens in the period after the 12 + 2 days if they come up with the 'goods' ? :confused:

 

 

Whoops - looks like my question from the other day has sparked some 'debate'. Is there a definative answer now ?? Thanks All !!

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to NatWest 30 March 07

Statements received 2 May

SAR sent Barclays 30 March 07

SAR sent Barclaycard 30 March 2007

SAR sent RBS 5 April 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the Moderator's........Please what happens now then, if the 42 days have passed and we/I have heard absolutely nothing, what do I do. ????? thats the stage I am at now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found that quite a few of my older credit cards have no agreements available. I'm still outstanding a few replies but so far,;

- RBS confirmed they have no credit agreement and have 'discharged' the debt (written it off) without me even asking for this.

- HSBC confirmed no credit agreement but say the debt still exists (which is true but it cant be enforced)

- Citicards confirmed no credit agreement.

 

What is more worrying though is that all three of the above companies say that under the DPA they only have to provide a copy of my agreement and therefore enclose a copy of the terms and conditions from the time my account was signed up. They say that this proves I agreed to the processing of my data and accordingly they will not remove the default. I'm very concerned that all three are saying the same thing - either they have some basis in law or I suspect the banks have been speaking to each other on this specific issue.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS: See my post above - MBNA and Capital One are also in default to s78 response from me. When Cap One phoned looking for money I pointed this out and they said whilst they couldnt enforce they could send debt collectors round as the debt still exists. I DEFINITELY dont want that to happen.......

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the Moderator's........Please what happens now then, if the 42 days have passed and we/I have heard absolutely nothing, what do I do. ????? thats the stage I am at now.

 

Did a Moderator get back to you ? I'd also be interested in this advice !!

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to NatWest 30 March 07

Statements received 2 May

SAR sent Barclays 30 March 07

SAR sent Barclaycard 30 March 2007

SAR sent RBS 5 April 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did a Moderator get back to you ? I'd also be interested in this advice !!

 

Then they are in default until thy supply you with the agreement,at this point the debt cannot be enforced through the courts but still exists. You are now in a in a good position to offr a full and final settlement of a small % of th debt.

 

After the 30 days they ahve committed an offence but it doesn't really benefit you as you cannot take any action, but atthis point you should report them to hem to trading standards.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then they are in default until thy supply you with the agreement,at this point the debt cannot be enforced through the courts but still exists. You are now in a in a good position to offr a full and final settlement of a small % of th debt.

 

After the 30 days they ahve committed an offence but it doesn't really benefit you as you cannot take any action, but atthis point you should report them to hem to trading standards.

 

 

:) Useful - Thank You. Can they pass/sell the 'debt' on to as DCA or similar even if they are in breach ??

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to NatWest 30 March 07

Statements received 2 May

SAR sent Barclays 30 March 07

SAR sent Barclaycard 30 March 2007

SAR sent RBS 5 April 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep - the debt still exists

 

 

:mad: :mad: Thanks I had a feeling you might say that - Shucks !! So can this mean the DCA (or whoever 'takes over' the debt (if that's what happens?) going down the CCJ/ Balliff's road ?

 

Sorry to be a pain :confused:

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to NatWest 30 March 07

Statements received 2 May

SAR sent Barclays 30 March 07

SAR sent Barclaycard 30 March 2007

SAR sent RBS 5 April 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they sell the debt on again though, surely they will hit the same brick wall eventually, no agreement - no enforcable debt, it would go round in circles wouldn't it. ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

even though the debt still exists, any dca who did purchase it would be rather silly as it is still unenforcable by them if no credit agreement is available.as far as i am aware the original creditors or a dca are also on sticky ground in attempting to enforce the debt in the knowledge that no agreement is present, and any attempts should be reported to the fsa and the ts in the event of this happening.good luck 007

"ALWAYS QUOTE ME AS BEING MISQUOTED" :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

even though the debt still exists, any dca who did purchase it would be rather silly as it is still unenforcable by them if no credit agreement is available.as far as i am aware the original creditors or a dca are also on sticky ground in attempting to enforce the debt in the knowledge that no agreement is present, and any attempts should be reported to the fsa and the ts in the event of this happening.good luck 007

anyone know what counts as 'enforcement' - is writing to you / calling you / visiting you enforecement or is it taking you to court ?

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone know what counts as 'enforcement' - is writing to you / calling you / visiting you enforecement or is it taking you to court ?

 

AFAIK it is court proceedings - they will try their best to wear you down to agree to pay something.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

even though the debt still exists, any dca who did purchase it would be rather silly as it is still unenforcable by them if no credit agreement is available.

 

But they still do it - they just sell it for absolute peanuts and a few years down the line you get some more letters etc. from someone else

 

While it might seem bizarre that they would do this, they probably roll "your" debt into a "package" - say 10,000 "customer accounts" for a few grand - pays the electricity bill for a few months...

 

... and for the DCA taking them on, maybe, just maybe one or two of those people will pay up, even though they don't have to, which will pay for the rest...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have recently completed the cca route successfully thru brian carter/fredricksons and also scotcall/cabot...after getting the letters back stating they have no cca`s 30 days plus two are up on the 12th june.I took advice from national debt helpline who sent me a template letter stating no further contact sholud be made without the cca`s and also that I do not want them to sell the debt on.After they have recieved that letter they would be acting illegally if they sold the debt on further...It`s probably a little late now to help...but just thought I`d try and clarify for future readers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If theres no cca, how can the debt exist? It can't be enforced, they can't default you etc so how can it exist? It must hang over you forever & ever amen?

someone correct me if i'm wrong

Edited by Chickenlicken
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...