Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

voyager9 vs yorkshire ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone first can i say what a brilliant site!!!!! i have been reading threads for a while and finally decided to take the plunge

 

i sent prelim letter to branch on 23/03/2007 and have had the usual fob off letter today 30/03/2007

 

just a quick question should i now go ahead with lba letter straight away or wait for 14 days to lapse

 

this is the first in a line of banks who i am going to get my charges back and i suppose it will be less worry after the first lol

 

thanks

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:oops: hi again just read guide again it advise to wait the 14 days will do that

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

should i add overdraft interest to the total , it only amounts to £10.88 but when i add s.69 interest there will be interest on that interest wont there and does it matter that i didnt include it on the prilim letter?

 

should i amend LBA letter in any way ?

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replying zoot

 

do i need to change wording to reflect why the amount has gon up

thanks

 

could you also look at my other thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/78487-voyager-9-bank-scotland.html#post689474

 

thanks again

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks bigmac

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok just had this letter another fob off

 

i note this was sent to arrive today giving them another 4 days stalling however didnt work because i anticipated this and sent lba early so they still have to comply within my termsof 14 days lol :grin:

 

heres the letter see what you all think

 

Dear voyager9

 

Re: Charges Complaint not a complaint a request

 

I refer to your recent letter. I note from your letter that you feel excessive charges were applied to your bank account during recent years.

During this time, the relationship between you and the Bank was governed by the Bank's standard terms and conditions. Those terms and conditions provided that:

 

 

(1) Free banking is available while your account remains in credit or within an agreed overdraft limit.

(whats that got to do with it)

  1. You must obtain the Bank's agreement before overdrawing on your account. (not disputing that)
  2. If the Bank made payments from the Account or paid cheques which were guaranteed by the associated cheque guarantee card when there were insufficient funds available, any overdraft created or any overdraft which exceeded an agreed overdraft limit would be unauthorised. (didnt have a cheque card so doesnt apply)
  3. If you drew cheques or authorised or made payments without sufficient money available in your account, taking account of any overdraft limit and allowing for uncleared cheques, the Bank might return the payments and make a charge for doing so. (might and at least there admitting there charges)
  4. Charges and interest applicable to the Account were published in the form of tariffs and up-to-date tariffs were available in branches and from time to time enclosed with bank statements. (didnt say you would [edit] blind though did they)

  1. Where appropriate, written details of overdraft charges and debit interest incurred on the account during the previous charging period (i.e., the previous month) would be sent to you at least 14 days before the charges and interest were deducted from your account. (how kind give us 14 days notice to be [edit] how nice)
  2. If the account had an unauthorised overdraft, additional charges might be levied which would be debited to the account on the day on which the unauthorised overdraft was created. (? give us notice then [edit] us anyway)
  3. If the Bank increased a charge for a basic account service, the Bank would give you at least 30 days' notice. (what that got to do with it)

I would note that the Terms and Conditions complied with all relevant requirements of the Banking Code. You are responsible for the running of your account, and for ensuring that sufficient funds are in your account to meet the standing orders, direct debits and cheques which you have created or drawn on the account. As stated in the Terms and Conditions governing your account with the Bank, you are aware that charges will be incurred if insufficient funds are in your account on the dates the payments you have instructed are debited. The charges applied to your account were applied in accordance with the Terms and Conditions, as a result of your operation of the account.

Further, the terms and conditions were fair having regard to the following matters:

  1. The cost to the Bank of maintaining administrative systems relating to unauthorised overdrafts, unpaid cheques and direct debits and abuse of cheque and debit cards for the purpose of keeping the level of overdrawing under review and controlled as far as possible.
  2. The increased risk of loss to the Bank arising from such unauthorised transactions and the associated cost of enforcement and recovery systems.
  3. The need to operate standard procedures and to set standard charges in order to avoid the substantial costs of individual assessment in relation to each particular case.

( they are admitting its all done on a system surely this can be used in the AQ for them to disclose how much it actually costs)

 

Taking all of the above into account and having regard to the information that you have given, I am not prepared to refund the charges on your account. (suprise suprise in other words we dont know whether you will give up becuase of the fob offs yet so please bare with us untill we know you wont back down lol)

 

If we do not receive a response from you within eight weeks of the date of this letter, your complaint will be considered closed. (bet your bottom dollar you`ll have a response matey!!)

 

If you have any additional information that you wish to provide please do not hesitate to write to us at the Advice Quality Unit — Charges Section,

Yours sincerely

 

Advice Quality Unit — Charges Section

 

 

at least they cant deny there charges lol:grin:

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

right am filing n1 tommorrow

i question if anyone can answer i have put "yorkshire bank" as the defendant will this be ok or not

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

there isnt much i can tell you have a look in the following thread you should find what you need there

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

i havent had problems like you yet! but no doubt will

 

also have you started your own thread you may get more help

 

also make sure you read faq`s

 

hope this helps voyager

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

well everyone i have filed papers at court today so here we go :D

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i have now had to do the same with my bank of scotland sar request lba went out yesterday so will wait on that one to see if it produces results.

 

with this claim i am still waiting to be told by court papers have been served.

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received notice of issue from court today

deemed served 25th april and they have untill 11th may to acknowledge.

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck voyager!! :) still waiting for my charges to come through!! thats 48 days since my DPA Letter!! and im told now that im going to have to wait another 3 weeks!!! then i will be demanding my money in court!! xx hope it all goes well x

Thanx for your help again,

 

Caroline x:p x

Link to post
Share on other sites

still not acknowledged hope they forget lol but then again i wouldnt be that lucky lol only 3 days left tic toc tic toc then again i might get our friendly judge from newark/lincoln lol naw now that would be too lucky for me lol:D

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they have acknowledged they now have untill 25th may to file defence! i can stll hope for our friendly judge lol

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey guys!!! EVENTUALLY!!! i have recieved my statements/charges!!! whoopie!!! it totaled up to £1642.54, whats my nest step now?? send them another prelum letter x im in scotland!! help me!! xx he he he xx

 

Caroline xx x

Thanx for your help again,

 

Caroline x:p x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone, (first post ever) I've finally got my statements from yorkshire bank after starting on 7th dec 06. I've read alot of the site and posts which has thrown up a couple of points I'm not sure about.

Some say claim for the three monthly overdraft fee (charges)where you stay within a certain overdraft limit and others say not to.

The other is debit interest,am I right in thinking this is interest paid on the overdraft and should not be claimed for. thxs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi mooch and welcome i am afraid i am not too well up on that because i am not going after that my best advice would be to start a thread you will probably get more help that way and read faq`s again and again

sorry i cant be more help on this one

 

hi pitman well done your nearly there i am not versed up on scottish procedure as i am in england sorry mate

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey guys!!! EVENTUALLY!!! i have recieved my statements/charges!!! whoopie!!! it totaled up to £1642.54, whats my nest step now?? send them another prelum letter x im in scotland!! help me!! xx he he he xx

 

Caroline xx x

Good to hear you eventually got them Caroline. Best thing to do now is start a thread for your claim and folk can advise you about each step on that. That way it gives you an easy reference point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

still no defense received, tommorow is last day so keep your fingers and toes crossed for me:D

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

in fact had no contact or offers from them whatsoever think they`ve forgotten about me lol

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...