Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
    • That may be your personal claimed experience I said i didn't want smart meters - you jumped in to recommend smart meters I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest paying what I owe every month I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest a variable tariff - even if its one that only varies on a daily basis rather than half/hourly - with prices higher in winter when you need it and lowest in summer when you need it least   politeness ends with: - I'm NOT interested in any smart tariff I see, You are pushing your smart meter + variable tariffs in the wrong place - try pushing them somewhere 'nearer to home'  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£800 Powergen bill....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

what i was trying to say was not that the installer had got it wrong but that powergen changed the cheap rate hours from 12 til 7am to 10.30 pm to 12.30am and then from 2.30 am to 7.30 am. without letting me know!! so all my timers clicked on at 12.15,( enough to give them their 15 min allowance,) the meter clock runs 13 mins fast so everything in the house fired up at 3 mins before i hit day rate for 2 hours.

Storage heater on full whack, 2 convectors on, washer and oven! if i'd known i'd have reset to 10.45 pm

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had similar problems with powergen a few years ago. After a letter increasing our DD to £96 per month, we question the increase and was told that it had was caused by previous estimated bills, but we had been paying the same monthly amount with them on DD for the previous seven years. we asked for the meter to be checked and they refused saying there was nothing wrong with it, we then complained to energywatch and they told them they had checked the meter (lies, because they refused to do it) and said that it was fine and we still had to pay. Energywatch said they were closing the file as they were told the problem was sorted, we complained to them and told them the truth about the matter and all they said was they would write to them again. Anyway we changed supplier and told powergen that we had cancelled the DD so now they would have to do something about it. They did - they sent it to a DCA and still didnt check meter. I told DCA that I was not paying until meter was checked and fixed, they sent debt back to powergen. Powergen then said they couldnt check meter as they were no longer our supplier. They then did something positive - they sent the debt to another DCA, same story until they gave up. Its a shame energywatch were so slow as the amount had decreased to £65 by the time I cancelled DD, cuz we still ended up paying over double the amount we normally pay for a year

 

I (mistakenly) thought that withholding payment would have got them to sort the problem, but their only interest was getting our money. Our new supplier checked the meter for us and now bills are back to normal

 

what was the amount of our unexpected bill, yes youve guessed it £802

Link to post
Share on other sites

josamolly did you check your meter to see what times it changes over from day to night and vice versa. powergen are still telling me 12-7 if i ring and ask the adviser at the other end of the phone. also check the clock on the meter and see if that is telling you the right time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok an update... Having just given Powergen another reading apparantly i am using £23.65 per week in electric.. does this sound normal? It certainly doesn't to me...

 

I haven't yet checked as to what time it is switching over, but the consimption just seems so high..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Josamolly. I've managed to get mine down to £26 a week by avoiding the 18p a unit from 12.30am- 2.30am, having the storage heaters and immersion removed, and putting timers on everything else to use the 4p units. The fridge and freezer run for 2 hours through the day to top up and i've given up using the cooker, and hairdryer!! I don't use an iron dryer or hoover (i have a pine floor), don't have a tv and I use the fluorescent in the aquarium for lighting in the front room. I live alone in a 2 bed flat. I just found on all the gumpf on my electricity two meter readings from last year. 27th june06 4956 day rate, 12th july 06 5599,

night rate 4731, 5393. What do you think of that then??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update on this... having paid £400 off, i still have a £467 bill... they have taken readings from me over the past few weeks and still insist it is correct....

 

Where do i go now.... ggrrrr

Link to post
Share on other sites

This £800 business is spooky !!

 

Okay, this isn't Powergen, it was British Gas, but here goes.

 

Late last year, I recieved a Gas bill for around £400, which I thought was a bit high so I rang them.

At first I thought it was because the lazy @@**'s had not been reading the meters for ages, and had just been sending estimated bills.

I went out to the front of the house to read the meter to give them an actual reading. Whilst reading it I noticed the metering wheel was flying around, which I thought odd, as I had no gas appliances on at the time?

Just out of interest, I then decided to open up the other two meter boxes at the front of the house (it's a house converted into 3 flats), and lo and behold, after switching appliances on and off, I realised that British Gas had got the meters the wrong way round, and I was paying someone else's Gas bill !!

After further investigation, it appears this had been the case for over 6 years !!!

I complained, and got a refund of around £800....... great !!

 

However... I was also concerned that this meant that the recently bereaved pensioner on the ground floor would be liable for the same sum.

I felt I had to argue her case also. ie; she would have been a lot more careful with her Gas consumption, had she known it's true cost, and so should not be held liable for their own error.

They were having nothing of this, and I also complained to the Ombudsman Energywatch..... who surprise surprise, although shocked have no authority to interven and force compliance.. (a bit like the OFT) !!

 

The crux of the issue is, that when the peeps come to read the meters, they are supposed to check something called the MPR (Meter point Reference), and this confirms the property the meter relates to.... instead they were just opening the boxes, and just guessing which meter related to which flat.

 

The current situation is that the poor lady on the ground floor has now been forced to use a Keycard, and every time she puts it in, practically all credit is sucked off.

 

At the same time I wrote to energywatch, I also CC'd my letters to my local MP's and Council, and the Local Press. All were horrified (I even got a phone call at home from my MP, ready to take this on..... suppose it's a vote winner the cynic in me says, but anyhow it was good to know they were on board)

 

The way the situation stands now, is that the lady in question could not handle all the stress at the time (bereavement etc) and asked me to hold back on pursuing the case.

She has now just asked me to re-start matters. And this I certainly will do (just want to get my Bank charges issues resolved first, and anyhow I believe that Statute of Limitations gives us another 5 and a half years from cause of action, ie, my discovery to instigate claim)

 

My question to you all here is this:

 

Rather than just demanding that her bill be wiped, I now think it would be worth pursuing this regards Damages. ie; From my own point, the fact that I was put under additional financial stress due to their errors for over 6 years (financial stress that did actually cause me to become ill at one point).

Plus from the pensioners point, damages for the financial hardship, and stress it has put her through in recent months, plus the strain of dealing with this all.

Any views anyone ??

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...