Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

KM_S v Capital One ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

FANTASTIC. A WHOLE NEW STREAM OF REVENUE FOR BAILLIFS! Instead of knocking on domestic doors they can now knock on corporate ones. EXCELLENT!

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey ho

A letter from Cap One

here goes

 

24 July 2007

Account Number xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

Claim Number 7BV00708

 

Dear KM_S

 

Further to your letter of 14 July 2007, I have looked into the matter of the refunds and it does appear there has been an error and the money has not yet been placed into your account. I have today personnally arranged that, as stated in my letter of 29 June 2007, we have credited £769.53 to your account in order to bring it up to date and arranged to send you a cheque for £1962.30 which you should receive within 14 working days. I apologise for the delay in these refunds.

 

In relation to the fact that we did not receive your claim, it is accepted that you wrote to us on the 5th June 2007, however this letter was not received by our Legal department. It would appear that this letter went to our complaints department and was incorrectly worked by a menber of that team. We acknowledge every claim we receive and it would be of no benefit to us if we did not. As we receive numerous claims each day it is entirely possible that yours was not received due to a fault with the postal system.

 

I do hope that the refunds as detailed above and in my last letter are satisfactory and that you will now contact the court and inform them that the claim has been settled.

Yours sincerely

Graham daley

etc etc

 

Well what aturn up, there is only a couple of snags with this letter, first that have not mentioned about the bailiffs fees, second they are responsible for their staff, third missing papers in post hummmmm maybe its their postal system and they are responsible for credit!!!, what about the extra interest they have charged me and finally what about the extra interest I have lost out on.

I shall write to them informing them of these facts and informing them that I shall not be informing the court the claim is settled until all moneys are cleared into our account.

I have checked our account, they have paid the £769.53 to the account and so I will have to let the court know about that.

 

Any folks comments please........

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my proposed response

 

Claim number 7BV00708

Dear Mr Daley

In reply to your letter dated 24 July 2007, I am afraid I have to inform you that due to your delay in replying to my letter, a warrant of execution (V0000303) was issued on the 23/07/2007, this warrant will be executed in the Nottingham County Court.

As you were aware I wrote on the 14th July informing you what action I would take if the refunds were not immediately forthcoming. I have given you ample opportunity to settle this claim, even extending timescales, the fact you claim that you did not receive the claim from the court and to claim it is possible it was not received due to a fault with the postal system seems a lame excuse and one I am sure you would not accept from your customers.

It strikes me that some of your staff have not acted in the correct manner, I presume you have procedures laid down to deal with complaints therefore perhaps you can explain to me why the person who was working on my letter dated 5th June did not respond to me. I believe that Capital One is responsible for the actions of its employees, therefore Capital One is responsible for not responding to the court.

As I have said I have asked for a warrant of execution which has been issued, I will of course inform the court you have made a part payment of £769.53 but I cannot tell the court the claim has been settled as there is still moneys outstanding.

Furthermore there is a fee of £55 for the warrant of execution, extra interest on my account, interest due to you not paying when you said you would.

Yours sincerely

KM_S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to hear you got that letter and quite rightly you should ask for the £55 and also your interest up to the date of payment, I did with my O/H's claim and got another cheque sent out from them no problem. I would perhaps work out when you should receive their cheque and work out the daily rate they owe up up to that date to make sure you get the full amount, Cap One seem to be a bit forgetful. Well done. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks doo but as the warrent has been granted the bailiffs could call on them any time. That could mean I might get full cci which would be an extra 2k.

Is my proposed reply to them ok, I dont want to tell the court it is settled until there cheque clears.

 

KM_S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Km_s

 

The baliffs would ask for the total of your claim, that would include the CCI as well. Capital One need to know this. There is a postal strike over the next 2 weeks affecting different areas of the post. Maybe worth a quick call to them aking for your cheque to be deliverd by a courier. If this is'nt acceptable to them, explain that a local TV crew will accompany the baliffs when they visit. A call to your local station will get some interest.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooohhh well done sowerby-i might try e-mailing her too.was going to file my n1 with lloyds today but am going to wait a couple of days to see what the oft case brings!!!!!!!

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long does it generally take for victoria to reply??-oh and happy spending.xx-how much was it again??

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooohhh well done sowerby-i might try e-mailing her too.was going to file my n1 with lloyds today but am going to wait a couple of days to see what the oft case brings!!!!!!!

 

Hi jubaxt get the N1 in the least it will do is establish your case in court for 8% stat interest.

 

all the best dpick:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi KM_S - quite a while ago someone on cap one forum managed to get payment into their account by BACS - maybe you could e-mail the address that Sowerby has left above in post 134.

Link to post
Share on other sites

set aside for what to keep the bailiffs from going in? Well hopefully you will get your money soon have you got it today in the post? Can you check your account? Hold out for the cci make them pay it you have already got the bailiffs in place they must be bricking it by now hence the set aside.I would not worry think you will just get your pennies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheque arrived sat £1962.30 so as soon as it clears I will inform the court what they have paid, from what I understand I can object to the set aside and its then up to the judge. Should I advise cap one what I am doing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The total they have paid is the amount plus stat interest, my original claim was for cci. When the cheque has cleared I will inform the court what has been paid. I have had to pay another £55 for the warrent of execution due to their delay in paying so they can cough up with that as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter from court this morning, Notice of hearing of application, it is cap ones application for a set aside, the reason they give is that they feel they have a real prospect of successfully defending the claim.

They say they never received the original claim, I wrote to them on the 5th June informing them they had not responded to the court and I would give them a further 7 days to respond. They still didnt respond so I asked for judgement which was granted. They wrote on 29th June saying they would pay fees, costs plus 8% stat interest and we would receive cheque within 14 working days and they had paid some into our account. This wasnt done. Wrote again 14th July saying nothing received, and if it wasnt by 19th would ask for warrent of execution which we did. Not sure if cheque going to clear or if they will cancel it.

My question is do they have a good chance of getting a set aside?

 

KM_S

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so. . you have it in writing that they were supposed to be paying you. Also if they use the OFT test case as an excuse, Credit Card charges are not included in this action. I would inform them that if they do not settle this quickly, that you will put in a wasted costs order against them.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Uk, we banked their cheque on Monday so it should clear by tomorrow at the latest, my only concern was that IF they manage to get a set aside they are going to fight to get it thrown out , would we have to pay back money in that case.

Still it looks like its up to the judge on the 21st. it might help if I knew how many times they have paid CCI and how many cases they have said they will defend then paid out before case as I think that could sway the judge in our favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...